And how is it prooven? You need a court order for urine and blood samples.
the fact is: IT'S STILL AGAINST THE LAW!
case closed. I refuse to argue with a n00b.
This is a little off topic, but I fucking hate coppers in general and I think with good reason. In my opinion they are fair scumbags, mainly because they would rather bust a bunch of people for minor offences than a few people for serious ones.
While it is definately true that the coppers don't make the laws they are just expected to enforce them, it is my belief they generally choose to enforce minor laws over major ones because basically it is easier for them to look better this way. It is a pretty selfish mentality IMO when someone knows that the guy 3Km's over the speed limit, who blows .06, who gets caught with a gram of weed or a few pills, etc. really isn't doing much harm to the community but are easier to catch and look better on paper than catching one or two rapists, murderers or kiddie touchers. You know booking someone is 5 minutes in the life of a pig, but it changes the person they are bookings life from then on out. They can be left with fines they struggle to pay, not be allowed to travel to places they always wanted to go, get turned down for their dream job, etc. A pig doesn't give the slightest shit about this person, of who they victimise many daily, what they give a fuck about is another notch in their belt. It is easier for a piggy to move up the ranks with 1000 minor offences on his belt than 5 meaningful ones, so that is how they operate.
It is not because I assume they support the laws the enforce, but because they do so mindlessly and focus on whats easier for them as opposed to what they percieve makes the biggest improvement on society. Obviously not all cops are like this, but it is my sincere belief that most are. Also, something about the job seems to attract adrenaline junkie fuckheads that are on a power trip and their attitude just plain sucks.
the fact is: IT'S STILL AGAINST THE LAW!
case closed. I refuse to argue with a n00b.
John Brumby's budget in 08, 09, shows $397 million in speeding fines, then they predict in 09, 010, for it to jump to $437 million," he said.
"Some parts of the state, Mornington Peninsula, Frankston, have jumped up by over 80 per cent."
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/03/25/2855467.htm
Thats 397million for victoria alone
Wow, I am 100% wrong it would seem.
This makes me sad... and very very confused.
NOW AERO LISTEN UP!
The Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act (DPCSA) includes these major drug offences: use, possession, cultivation, and trafficking.
Use includes smoking, inhaling of fumes, or otherwise introducing a drug of dependence, into a person's body (including another person's body). A drug is defined as a "drug of dependence" if listed as illegal except under prescribed conditions. Generally there is a lesser penalty for the use of cannabis compared to other drugs.
http://www.druginfo.adf.org.au/druginfo/drugs/drug_laws
http://www.druginfo.adf.org.au/druginfo/drugs/drug_laws
http://www.druginfo.adf.org.au/druginfo/drugs/drug_laws
Same reference three times CASE CLOSED
Now please, when MrIbis says HE was charged with drug USE he probably knows his life better then you do.
Also as far as the one gram that matthew stokes was charged with trafficking because he was going to share it with a mate. They couldn't charge him with use, because he wasn't intoxicated with said substance.
Now that all this bullshit is out of the way, lets please get back on topic or close the thread. =)
Party safe![]()
I understand what you're saying, but it is flawed.
I can't think of a media case off the top of my head, but more importantly the point still stands that it is Illegal.
Also if you took a pill in frongt of a policeman they will charge you with both drug possesession and drug use. If you tried to fight it saying it wasn't an illicit drug, and was a legal high you might pass. But it ultimately becomes your word against theirs.
As MrIbis has stated in the past and you have just reitterated, you're right to remain silent is your best friend, it makes it a hell of alot harder for for a policeman to prove use if you have used this right.
But it is still very much against the law, and they can and will prosecute you for it.
You're making it sound like we should just wave at cops as we digest illicit drugs, this is NOT HR and can easily cause harm to the lovely people here at bluelight.
+1 mr mentorThis is a little off topic, but I fucking hate coppers
Aero though man, the traffic tests are pretty much just an extention of the drug war. The law states they can't be in your system while you drive, not that you can't drive while intoxicated. I mean technically you have to be driving to be tested but you are definately being done for using drugs. They can hide behind the fact you are driving but tell me this, if you are not intoxicated then what is the relevance? It is just harder to pass random drug testing for everyone, atleast they can hide behind safety bullshit with drug testing drivers, don't be fooled it is just another way to fuck us drug users over.
I believe drug use is a crime, its just not one you are likely to be charged with because it is a lot of hassle to book someone when you have to give them drug tests and all sorts just to find out if they really are on drugs. Usually if you are on drugs they can get you for possession or something and if not it probably isn't worth the hassle the majority of the time, that is just common sense really.
This leads me to ponder if you ever attended school.