• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Shambles

Is the Royal Family going to 'throw Andrew Mountbatten Windsor under the bus' ?

Not a royalist by any means, but even if the entire royal family was killed tomorrow, Camilla's son could never be in line as he isn't a direct and legitimate son of a monarch.
Thank you. I don't know how the succession works past the first few. I Know that if Kate had a daughter first, she would be the successor. ( provided William doesn't divorce her for some hideous monster. Like father like son, maybe? No, William would want a hot but almost classy slag.lol( Hot, upper middle class and less wrinkly than Kate).
My perdiction. Next time.

Why did they name their kid George? King George III, lost two wars to America alone? He also lost his mind.

The Queen Mum, I liked her. She was happy not to be senile and over 100. She wanted to and kept her marbles.( old timey slang),

Opps. Thank you for clearing that up. Ok, I will be 😐 neutral in this.

What do you think( yes, I know your not a royalist. But if you are stuck with a royal family; how as a British citizen and as a person view future King William?

I am not saying you want or don't want a royal family. Just, do you think he will be like his grandmother; or do you see him as something else. Will it be the same?

William, if you are stuck with a " royalty". Do you think he will do a good job or do you think he might be an issue?
 
I don't get why Liz had to hold on for so long.

Did she / they really distrust Charles that much?

(As 'loose cannons' go in this day and age, he doesn't even make it onto the bottom of any such list imo.)

I wonder what the real reasons were.

Not just her 'sense of duty' surely?
Haha, loose canon, he ain't even a musket. Is William potentially. I ask because I would loose my mind( what's left of it) no, I like quiet or controlled noise. I might hang myself( I am not suicidal), but being an impotent King ? ( metaphorically). Your tabloids have made that clear.lol

That would have been as painful as being as being a handsome Eunuch who works for a senile but kind, king with the hottest harem and says help yourself to them. I got 100 too many wives let alone what do with them. What can I do with hundreds of extra concubines? Like most guys, I have only one dick.lol

That would be exhausting having more than one.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
 
It's abit suspect that Vrgina giuffre just happened to kill herself as well. Also didnt another girl kill herself to? Smells like a cover up to me
Yeah as conspiracy theories go, that one would not seem to be beyond the realms of possibility by any means. Why would she do that all those years later, just as her book came out?

Same as Epstein's supposed suicide in prison. Wasn't he supposed to be on constant watch for suicide risk?

Just to add to it, there is possibly some kind of 'black ops' wing of the Royal Family's security team, due to the immense wealth, power, and influence they possess, and the royal family themselves may or may not know about the existence of such an entity.

Tbh I would imagine that if it does exist the Royals probably don't know about it. Gives them plausible deniability of any nasty events.
 
Last edited:
OK, Bleaney, oh shit they might send The special gun cops after you. OK, how about it; is it Mi-5 or Mi-6 or both that does the royals wet, I mean dirty work.

Do you think they might need..... an outsider, just curious.lol

I used wet as a secret code that every assassin is familiar with. Gee, how cleaver. huh huh, that wuz kool. Being a dumbass is bliss. I need more..... sleep.
 
I forgot to add; yes they probably will, but after The Murder of Princess Di, The future king of England( Billy 'the bald') might be more hesitant than Prince Philip was.

If they do, they better, back it up and run him over a few more times to make sure.
Use a double decker bus.lol Full of Fat American tourists.lol
 
I dont think they can charge him at all can they still? Im pretty sure he still has immunity from prosecution

It's to bad the PIRA arent around to blow him up like they blew up his pedo uncle lord Mountbatten
 
I dont think they can charge him at all can they still? Im pretty sure he still has immunity from prosecution

It's to bad the PIRA arent around to blow him up like they blew up his pedo uncle lord Mountbatten
They can certainly charge him on dodgy trade deals he's done and some other dodgy stuff.

And apparently that is going to happen according to the biographer, Lownie. Andrew no longer has royal status as any form of protection.

Even if he cant be charged or prosecuted for sex with an underage girl who had been trafficked, due to lack of evidence, at this stage.
 
Last edited:
Andrew Mounbatten-Windor. What an insufferable, odious cunt!
It seems even his entire family despises him, (apart from Fergie, apparently, they remain on friendly terms, and I don't know how his children feel about him) and want to wash their hands of him, so yeah totally agreed.
 
Last edited:
They're an ugly family, aren't they?

They married into Diana Spencer and Kate Middleton, but had they been binmen they would never have gone near them.

Ugly family.
Would you please stop being so kind to them. Also, when the old ones were alive; seeing them mad we me sick. They look like vampires( yes, I am aware of the family relation to Vlad Tepes; Vlad The Impaler. The real life Wallachian Prince, who was Count Dracula. The real man.
He is considered the most brutal ruler of all time.( yes his area was small, but in terms of absolute cruelty, brutality and depraved; he is in a league of his own).
Romania area now. He is a hero there.
 
They're an ugly family, aren't they?

They married into Diana Spencer and Kate Middleton, but had they been binmen they would never have gone near them.

Ugly family.
I dunno, I guess Prince Phillip was quite handsome as a young man, and I wouldn't say that Elizabeth was ugly in her prime either. I think she was quite good looking, in a sort of slightly dorky and shy, but elegantly aristocratic kind of way.

But I agree that their children all seemed to miss out in the looks department. Poor Charles with his huge ears as a young man, and the others weren't much better. Kate Middleton has been by far the best looking Royal match of late, excluding Meghan Markle, since her and Harry have chosen to exclude themselves, although apparently she still wants to hold on to her Duchess of Sussex title or w/e it is. Kate and William's children could grow up to be good looking, providing they inherit their mothers looks, maybe combined with their paternal Grandmothers?

Funnily enough I never found Princess Diana attractive. Although she was definitely glamorous and fashionable etc, which was totally revolutionary for the otherwise staid royals at the time.
 
Zara whatevershe'scalled is (or was anyway, haven't chanced upon her image lately) quite fit

Agreed re Diana - could never understand all the shouts of stunning at all

The dead Queen's equally dead sister Margaret was a bit of a goer though in her time apparently
 
I don't get why Liz had to hold on for so long.

Did she / they really distrust Charles that much?

(As 'loose cannons' go in this day and age, he doesn't even make it onto the bottom of any such list imo.)

I wonder what the real reasons were.

Not just her 'sense of duty' surely?

Sorry to go back a few posts but I thought this might make you laugh.

Tatler reported that almost the last official royal duty Queen Elizibeth II undertook was to accept the resignation of Boris Johnson. Apparently after the audience, she remarked to palace staff 'At least that idiot won't be in charge of organizing my funeral'.

But who can possibly guage the veracity of that story.

I suspect duty came into it. Being from a family of journalists, unpublished stories would do the rounds and unexpectedly, Princess Anne is widely regarded as the one royal who retained that sense of duty. Anne is the only one to observe that 'retirement isn't really an option'.
 
Sorry to go back a few posts but I thought this might make you laugh.

Tatler reported that almost the last official royal duty Queen Elizibeth II undertook was to accept the resignation of Boris Johnson. Apparently after the audience, she remarked to palace staff 'At least that idiot won't be in charge of organizing my funeral'.

But who can possibly guage the veracity of that story.

I suspect duty came into it. Being from a family of journalists, unpublished stories would do the rounds and unexpectedly, Princess Anne is widely regarded as the one royal who retained that sense of duty. Anne is the only one to observe that 'retirement isn't really an option'.
Could well be true.

As Paul Merton said on Have I Got News For You, directly to BJ, something very much like: "Behind the exterior of a bumbling buffoon..................there lies a bumbling buffoon." :ROFLMAO:

BJ probably was one of the most entertaining politicians to appear on that show, he is a bumbling buffoon, but he can also be funny and charismatic. Whatever you may think of his politics or competence at performing it.

Most people refer to BJ as a buffoon though :LOL: so they may have got the exact insult Queen Liz used slightly wrong.

Elizabeth never really retired though either AFAIR, although I'm sure her diary of public engagements got less and less demanding as the clock ticked down, and Charles was starting to step in a lot more in the final stages.

I think Prince Philip also only stopped when he was to ill to carry on.
 
Last edited:
Yeah - I'm monarchy neutral since it's hard to know how much tourism 'the firm' brings in.

For all his faults, It seems that at least that Prince Philip and The Princess of York (as was) actually married out of love. When he died during lockdown, she essentially sat through the funeral service by herself while Boris somehow confused getting pissed and playing bingo with work and only 'accidentaly' gathered in a room with fifty other inebriated idiots sans PPE.

To be clear, she wasn't the only person in St. Georges chapel but it seats 800 and there were 30 people present.

I guess the only person who really knew him can no longer tell us. But 83 year relationship, married for what, 75 years or so?
 
It's worth noting that Andy is only accused of shagging a 17 year old, which is perhaps distasteful for a man of his age, but perfectly legal under British law

Re bringing charges, there's the problem that Giuffre and Epstein are no longer with us and cannot give evidence
 
Most people refer to BJ as a buffoon though :LOL: so they may have got the exact insult Queen Liz used slightly wrong.

The "Le Bumbling Gentleman" persona is a total act, apparently he's very cold and calculated when he's not on camera. And he messes his hair up on purpose, performatively.
 
It's worth noting that Andy is only accused of shagging a 17 year old, which is perhaps distasteful for a man of his age, but perfectly legal under British law
Oh yeah, I'd forgotten that.

It's kind of bizarre that you can legally shag a 17 (or even 16?) year old girl, but you can't look at any 'sexualized images' of them as that's illegal.

But in the Andrew/Epstein case there was also the factor that the girl had been traficked into prostitution. Pretty sure that's a crime to knowingly use such 'services' as well as being totally morally reprehensible.

If she'd have been some kind of high class escort, earning a fortune for herself, and acting of her own free will, and at least one year older, then he'd have just been "Randy Andy" imho. Nothing worse than that. But it's all the circumstances put together that make it so bad.

That's just my opinion though.

Also, AFAIK although of course prostitution is not legal, I think it becomes more of a serious criminal issue if the girl is not even 18.
 
Last edited:
Top