• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion

    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Shambles

Is the Royal Family going to 'throw Andrew Mountbatten Windsor under the bus' ?

@Jnowhere They're no more likely to harm children than parents. Less, even.

When you've had hot coffee thrown in your face, been knocked to the ground by your head and slammed against a tiled floor, and threatened with a razor, had your belongings smashed to pieces, had your head slammed on a door jamb and suffered so many head strikes that you get a migraine problem, then you start to to think these things.

Hello mother.

Never had any harm from the people you're trying to vilify. Just the person who should have been my primary carer.
 
Jnowhere said:
I agree, but he is not charged with that is he?
Click to expand...

He's just been arrested [today], but as far as I'm aware he's so far only being charged with "misconduct in office" [in relation to his emails with Epstein]...but arrested/charged or not, he is ALL 0VER those files.
He's also been accused by women in the past [and did a RIDICUL0US interview that only served to convince the majority of the British public that he definitely WAS guilty. Like, he claimed he had never met the woman, and then photographs of them together at a part came out. She had called him "sweaty" in her accusations and he claimed he had a medical condition where he was unable to sweat...again, this is untrue [obviously].

Just my opinion, but I think he's guilty as fuck.
 
ChemicallyEnhanced said:
He's just been arrested [today], but as far as I'm aware he's so far only being charged with "misconduct in office" [in relation to his emails with Epstein]...but arrested/charged or not, he is ALL 0VER those files.
He's also been accused by women in the past [and did a RIDICUL0US interview that only served to convince the majority of the British public that he definitely WAS guilty. Like, he claimed he had never met the woman, and then photographs of them together at a part came out. She had called him "sweaty" in her accusations and he claimed he had a medical condition where he was unable to sweat...again, this is untrue [obviously].

Just my opinion, but I think he's guilty as fuck.
Click to expand...
I agree. I just thought this was about financial criminal activity or corruption type stuff. I know and everyone seeing some of this knows he is a pervert. I thought all the title stripping and public humiliation was all he was going to get for his epstein pervert shit.

I am not rich or poor, but even I know that blackmail and secret cameras are common in rich and especially royal circles.

I guess the royals are just stupid. This one is also a pervert.

Sweaty, you would think a useless royal, would at least have the decency to be showered and not "sweaty", lol.

I cannot fathom the way the rich and useless live their private lives.

You would think they would be smarter or have people around him to tell him not to be a scumbag, people and cameras are watching.

The British press is merciless in their pursuit of dirt on the royals. That is the impression that I get. Am I wrong?

I guess when you give a perverted moron money and a title; anything resembling common sense goes out the window.

Instead you find out what they are really like.

I have no desire to do such things. Even if I was rich and famous, I still would be the same. Except I would have destroyed myself with better alcohol.

Then also had access to benzos, and opiods to take care of hangovers or eventually wd's.

Andy is pervert, king chuckie is married to a Rottweiler, harry is useless and dumb.
prince willie is a cheater. What about the sister and eddie?
 
Oh, I guess it was mainly the paparazzi who use to chase/stalk Princess Di.

I believe she was murdered by the royals.

Ok, let me guess is one of them The Guardian?( who hate the royals)

Do people still read newspapers in England even half as much as before the internet became huge?

Also is there any centrist( non conservative or non leftist) newspapers in England.

You know, just factual reporting. Non-biased, one way or the other?
 
Jnowhere said:
I agree, but he is not charged with that is he?
Click to expand...

Quite true, he's not been charged with anything. Yet that doesn't stop a lot people from gloating over this situation.

He might be a pompous and insufferable little shit, but what's happening to him is fucking unfair. Period.
 
Illyria99 said:
Quite true, he's not been charged with anything. Yet that doesn't stop a lot people from gloating over this situation.

He might be a pompous and insufferable little shit, but what's happening to him is fucking unfair. Period.
Click to expand...
I actually agree about not gloating over others self brought on problems, but in this case I have to say, there is probably so much more about him( all bad) that is not known.

He is someone who had privilege without being in line for ribbon cutting ceremonies.lol

I look at my own life, and I am grateful for just being born in the West. There is no way that he just made a bad decision or two. He is probably not going to get any real punishment for what seems like a pattern of awful and criminal behavior.

I will save my pity for those who were born into truley bad circumstances. People who have no chance at ever being even working class by Western standards.

His family has abandoned him. Which considering the shit that some of his relatives have done is saying a lot more than those " allegations".

I somehow can't feel sorry for someone like him though. If he were a semi-decent human being there might be some sympathy, but that is not the case.

I have not had it easy. Why? My own damn fault. I was not born into privilege and wealth. I can at least recognize that life usually isn't easy. I know that a person should at least have common courtesy IRL and be grateful for what they have.

In his case he should have had a great life. However, his decisions and behavior, have caused this. However what about all those who struggle from birth just trying to survive.

Him and all the other Royals seem like they are miserable. Why? They didn't work for what they have. The UK tax payers have.

I never read( there was something once a long time ago, about prince eddie, but he seems to have stayed out of trouble since). princess Anne. She is only famous for being a royal who was the victim of a half assed kidnapping attempt. She has led a fairly quiet life.

However, his personality and his behavior is reprehensible. It is nice to see that at least there is some accountability for his actions. I am not really gloating but I have no sympathy.

I doubt he will end up in prison or on the street. But there is no pity for those who don't deserve any.
 
Jnowhere said:
I agree. I just thought this was about financial criminal activity or corruption type stuff. I know and everyone seeing some of this knows he is a pervert. I thought all the title stripping and public humiliation was all he was going to get for his epstein pervert shit.

I am not rich or poor, but even I know that blackmail and secret cameras are common in rich and especially royal circles.

I guess the royals are just stupid. This one is also a pervert.

Sweaty, you would think a useless royal, would at least have the decency to be showered and not "sweaty", lol.

I cannot fathom the way the rich and useless live their private lives.

You would think they would be smarter or have people around him to tell him not to be a scumbag, people and cameras are watching.

The British press is merciless in their pursuit of dirt on the royals. That is the impression that I get. Am I wrong?

I guess when you give a perverted moron money and a title; anything resembling common sense goes out the window.

Instead you find out what they are really like.

I have no desire to do such things. Even if I was rich and famous, I still would be the same. Except I would have destroyed myself with better alcohol.

Then also had access to benzos, and opiods to take care of hangovers or eventually wd's.

Andy is pervert, king chuckie is married to a Rottweiler, harry is useless and dumb.
prince willie is a cheater. What about the sister and eddie?
Click to expand...

The British press is pretty much merciless, period, lol, but especially in cases where such ire is deserved

I definitely get you mean...suddenly became a billionaire isn't gonna give you perversions you don't already have...I think ALL sexuality is never a choice. 0Bviously ACTING upon whatever you are into a choice, but, like, normal sexual attraction [gay, straight, etc] isn't a choice, and neither are harmless kinks or fetishes [feet, domination, spanking, whatever]...so I assume the fucked up stuff isn't either...but you gotta be a monster to ACT on them. I don't understand how people who are attracted to kids or animals etc can ACT on it. Like, surely any normal person capable of any understanding of human decency, or with a shred of empathy who DID realize they had such desires, would just NEVER EVER EVER even C0NSIDER acting on it?

^Even given seemingly unlimited wealth and power AND having those proclivities, why TF would you WANT to act on it? I think my first plan would be to see a private doctor for "chemical castration" drugs to make it physically impossible to do anything.
Same, were I rich, I'd still be exactly the same, just with enough money to afford as many high-quality drugs as I want and be able to afford for myself and family/friends to live the rest of our lives in comfort.
 
Jnowhere said:
I agree. I just thought this was about financial criminal activity or corruption type stuff. I know and everyone seeing some of this knows he is a pervert. I thought all the title stripping and public humiliation was all he was going to get for his epstein pervert shit.

I am not rich or poor, but even I know that blackmail and secret cameras are common in rich and especially royal circles.

I guess the royals are just stupid. This one is also a pervert.

Sweaty, you would think a useless royal, would at least have the decency to be showered and not "sweaty", lol.

I cannot fathom the way the rich and useless live their private lives.

You would think they would be smarter or have people around him to tell him not to be a scumbag, people and cameras are watching.

The British press is merciless in their pursuit of dirt on the royals. That is the impression that I get. Am I wrong?

I guess when you give a perverted moron money and a title; anything resembling common sense goes out the window.

Instead you find out what they are really like.

I have no desire to do such things. Even if I was rich and famous, I still would be the same. Except I would have destroyed myself with better alcohol.

Then also had access to benzos, and opiods to take care of hangovers or eventually wd's.

Andy is pervert, king chuckie is married to a Rottweiler, harry is useless and dumb.
prince willie is a cheater. What about the sister and eddie?
Click to expand...

IDK how most Brits feel about the Royals, or which specific Papers like or dislike them as I don't read any [I prefer to try and find more unbiased/honest sources].
I think - as an entity - that they're pretty redundant.
Based on what I know of Princess Diana, I really like her, but she was killed by Prince Charles and the Queen died in an accident when I was a baby
 
Illyria99 said:
Quite true, he's not been charged with anything. Yet that doesn't stop a lot people from gloating over this situation.

He might be a pompous and insufferable little shit, but what's happening to him is fucking unfair. Period.
Click to expand...
I looked into this more by watching a number of British news discussions on the topic.

They say he may have been giving sensitive info to epstein.

Espionage? He was also caught on camera walking through a park with epstein after his first conviction.( Epstein)

He may be guilty of using his position to give foreign countries, such as china and russia sensitive state info.

Espionage and Treason. That is legally much more serious than the potential sex trafficking allegations.

Blackmail or trading sensitive info for access to underage prostitutes?

That is treason. Life imprisonment, which really isn't but considering he is 66 years old, even 15 to 20 years might mean he dies in prison.

I think andy's days are numbered.( I don't mean legal consequences).

Also, his older brother may have helped payoff some of the victims. His brother is above the law but andy ain't.

Technically, according to British journalists, king chuckie is the head of the courts. charles or as I call him king chuckie, knew about this and andy will probably do anything to avoid prison.

I just wonder when and how they are going to make andy a " suicide" victim or maybe some very suspicious accident, might happen.

Are the book makers taking bets on how long he live?

They are probably thinking of killing him.
Oh no, they wouldn't do that, LMAO.

This could have such severe consequences too so many who knew and were complicit in this.

I think his days are numbered, unless they are too afraid of an even bigger scandal.

But, bumping him off would definitely be one way to save themselves( many probably knew).

He is infinitely more dangerous to the crown, than Princess Di.

Look what happened to her. I have seen and heard the evidence. That was a hit.( yes I know that is a bad pun).

Bump him off and then king chuckie could just abdicate the thrown to willie.
Citing health problems.

willie and Kate are not at all involved in this. But it is alleged that chuckie used "his money" to help settle and shut up the accuser in at leasst one case, for his brother.

They mentioned that his guns were taken.
I bet the royal family is pissed about that.
It would have been much easier for MI 6 to make it look like a suicide.

This about more than him being a "dirty old man".
 
Why the fuck would the Royal Family care about a few guns when, according to your previous logic, with their resources they could stage it all?

Tidily done, no suspicions, all tied up.

Or is omnipotence very selective?

You sound like you've lost it.
 
I get a strong feeling that he's gonna be charged with something

There's no way an English police force are even contemplating arresting him without him being bang to rights. Imo.

That's arresting him remember. Not asking him to attend for questioning, or asking him to come in at a later date with his Brief. Arresting him. The king's brother. At home. At 8am. On his fucking birthday :ROFLMAO:

What a day for the copper who got to arrest him too :cool:
 
ageingpartyfiend said:
I get a strong feeling that he's gonna be charged with something

There's no way an English police force are even contemplating arresting him without him being bang to rights. Imo.

That's arresting him remember. Not asking him to attend for questioning, or asking him to come in at a later date with his Brief. Arresting him. The king's brother. At home. At 8am. On his fucking birthday :ROFLMAO:

What a day for the copper who got to arrest him too :cool:
Click to expand...
Coppers, there was several of them, and several vehicles. According to a report I read somewhere.

They always seem to send way more people and vehicles than is necessary. (Once on my street, there was about 4 cars, and a van, and 8 coppers. I thought it was an armed siege or something. But no it was just an underage girl kicking off for them wanting to take a can of lager off her. :ROFLMAO: )

But in this case for 'security' etc, yeah the extra police and vehicles probably were necessary for security reasons.
 
Last edited:
Bleaney said:
Coppers, there was several of them, and several vehicles. According to a report I read somewhere.

They always seem to send way more people and vehicles than is necessary. (Once on my street, there was about 4 cars, and a van, and 8 coppers. I thought it was an armed siege or something. But no it was underage girl kicking off for them wanting to take a can of lager off her. :ROFLMAO: )

But in this case for 'security' etc, yeah the extra police and vehicles probably were necessary for security reasons.
Click to expand...
Yeah but one will have got to make the actual arrest, read him his rights etc. One to tell the grandkids

Hopefully some bodycam footage will emerge as will definitely have been used

Would be good to see the look on his face. See if there's any hint of a telltale bead of sweat on him
 
Didn't Andrew say that he had a medical condition that made it impossible for him to sweat? And that was pretty much his entire defense against the girls allegations, as she had said that he was sweaty when they had met :roll eyes: .

I'm sure she couldn't afford the same level of legal assistance as Andrew could, and he was possibly advised that even such a weak statement as that would probably be enough to see her off for a while just due to that.

As completely implausible as it sounds. But who's got the money to take on a royal? Even when their defense is as weak and incredible as that?

All so very very fishy, that frankly it stinks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top