LSD wishes it could compare to mushrooms,
Let's not personify LSD, please. LSD is an inanimate object not capable of desire. This doesn't need to devolve into a polarity, stereotyping, and broadly sweeping assumptions. Both drugs are capable of being anything from underwhelming to life-changing, from profound to barely noticeable, depending on so many factors. Nothing's guaranteed. I've done a lot of both drugs for decades now, which brings me to my next refutation.
you can trip on large doses of mushrooms weekly for years if you wanted (I went overboard and did just that for around 2 years) and come out the other end without any negative side effects, try that with acid and you'll end up a half wit that people don't enjoy being around. Plus the chance of HPPD which never happens with mushrooms.
I'm either living proof that this isn't true or I'm just woefully unaware of my half-wit status and
that explains why I have no friends… lol. Uh-oh, flashback coming on!
Also "you can trip on large doses of mushrooms weekly for years" ☜ no thanks, Champ. I'll leave that to you. I find shrooms too couch-locking. They make it hard to dance for me, and they're too emotional, occasionally even hostile-feeling. Furthermore, they're certainly not gonna win any culinary awards any time soon, let's just say, and they're not too friendly to the gut.
Most people arent even taking acid anyway probably some garbage RC but they'll sure tell you its pure and of course only they get the best hits ever bro so I don't even argue anymore I just nod along and pretend I believe them and stick to shrooms.
"Most people"? Is that right? You've got the stats for that? Because I think you're confusing now with a period about 10 years ago when there was an actual LSD shortage and there was a sudden proliferation of 25x-NBOMe drugs on blotter going around being sold as "acid", but this was some time ago. Currently there is high quality LSD all over the place, Aztec Acid, Gamma Goblin acid, Dr. Seuss 3, gel tabs, liquid, etc. And it's affordable, potent, and cleaner than it was in the past. Test kits are more popular than ever now, too, thanks in part to fentanyl.
As far as most lysergamides in the market go, 1. they're being honestly represented, the drug name written on each tab sometimes, 2. they're largely 1-substituted analogues that are simply prodrugs for LSD, and 3. as such, considering they're sourced from professionally run laboratories, the quality is very high. Some might even argue we're in a bit of an LSD golden age right now. Time will tell. In the interim I suggest get a new LSD source. I suspect you're missing out on the good stuff and might only be aware of shitty "L" from unscrupulous dealers.
Bottom line is: everyone is different. Some of us gravitate to shrooms, some to LSD, and some to neither. All of these things are fine, and if someone is in a different group from yours, it's for personal reasons that make sense to them, and if it doesn't make sense to you, that's fine, no need to criticize others as being "half-wit that people don't enjoy being around" who are dumb enough to not be aware they're not even taking LSD but rather a "garbage RC", which is interesting because now we're not even discussing someone on LSD but another drug altogether. Sounds like you have some bad personal experience you've projected on to everyone else. Whoever this person is in your life? That person doesn't represent the rest of the LSD-imbibing world, you know…