Decent duration (legs-> duration).decent legs means?
U-47700 is pretty much all gone these days and there aren't any other decent analogues from the U-series available, at least currently. If someone tries to sell you U-47700, it's a big sign of a scamI'll probably check some of these out.
How is the U-47700 market nowdays? I remember U-48800 too, but that was years ago.
Thanks for that. Been wondering for ages. Received a small sample of this when I ordered from a DNM alongside my benzos. Iv asked this guy for a free sample of this for a LONG time and he has never added, however, he has now added NDD guaranteed and signed for UK to UK postage so obviously as I was buying two items I told him to put it in 1 postal bag and use the extra £13 to add some metonitazine. Havnt weighed it but I will (with gloves and a mask)Decent duration (legs-> duration).
Subutex is Buprenorphine HCl. I don't believe there's a lighter salt than that, COO- is heavier than Cl- and acetate is the lightest you can go for an organic conjugate base (I'm fairly certain). If the compound was an acid Na+ could be used which is 23 g/mol while Cl- is 35.5 g/mol. But buprenorphine is more basic than acidic so it'd go for an acid to salt up with.Thanks for that. Been wondering for ages. Received a small sample of this when I ordered from a DNM alongside my benzos. Iv asked this guy for a free sample of this for a LONG time and he has never added, however, he has now added NDD guaranteed and signed for UK to UK postage so obviously as I was buying two items I told him to put it in 1 postal bag and use the extra £13 to add some metonitazine. Havnt weighed it but I will (with gloves and a mask)
Two questions I have....
1. What is this chess relationship with buprenorphine? - not that iv taken any for a few days - Thursday morning I think...obviously iv been using another opiate since - H. Also I would say I have a mid to high tolerance, I need 8mg of 'Espranor' brand bup, which I understand has a more pure salt of buprenorphine in than subutex or generic bup, therefore, it means u need less. They don't tend to go above 8mg on espanol and for the first week of switch over you will feel a bit ill and extra doses of espanol makes NO difference so I do believe that. Does metonitazene have a high enough binding affinity to the opiate receptors to overthrow the bup blocking them?
2. Does this show up on a typical drug screen? Does it show up as coming under morphine, heroin, methadone , buprenorphine or the best for me really none of these lol - from what I understand ifts a bit like the synthetic RC cannabiboids in terms of not showing up on drug screens for cannabis....
If I think of any more questions I'll ask.
Oh! I remember now!!
3. Does this chemical dissolve in water if I wanted to use volumetric dosing for snorting?
Also does it dissolve in PG or VG so I can make a vape juice out of it and use it as an e-liquid. I would imagine that is FAR safer than the first option as if you make it weak and it blacks you out you can't take more into your lungs so you just pass out before being able to take waaay too much.
I'd love to make a vape juice from this stuff tbh
there but for the grace of god go i. Your poor opioid receptors.... what's your plan for ya know, walking your way back OUT of addiction to compounds 180x more potent than existing etazene compounds? you know the guy who synthesized himself carfentanyl in utah smashed his own head in awaiting trial because of the WD right? just wondering what your end game could possibly beJust received a sample of It , this compound Is Fire! 180x , next time want to try protonitazene and metonitazene. Im a lucky guy
EXTREME caution. like probably just don't effing do it. who would want something 180x deadlier than already deadly compounds? with no way to know the actual chemical agent/dosage etc. that is just obviously a bad idea.Moved to OD and pasted some random data I found on the web about these compounds into the OP.
Anyone considering messing with anything like this needs to proceed with extreme caution.
Agreed, these compounds are likely super deadly.EXTREME caution. like probably just don't effing do it. who would want something 180x deadlier than already deadly compounds? with no way to know the actual chemical agent/dosage etc. that is just obviously a bad idea.
even from a vendor perspective this is kinda scuffed. Sure you might get some real died in the wool addicts but you're going to murder so many of your users it just seems like there's a point where the race to potency is extremely counter-productive.Agreed, these compounds are likely super deadly.
There is no reason to even play with such things when there are far safer grey area alternatives like ODSMT or kratom.
But alas, this is what heavily prohibiting powerful, but safer opioids like oxycodone and morphine gets us. People can't get their rush so they go to fentanyl, and then way further downstream you get shit like this.