• S E X
    L O V E +
    R E L A T I O N S H I P S


    ❤️ Welcome Guest! ❤️


    Posting Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • SLR Moderators: Senior Staff

National love service? (Cure for incels)

PriestTheyCalledHim said:
I know women who married men like this. The one is naive or stupid enough to actually believe that a guy who psychologically and emotionally abused her, and who she is with for his money and kept by will make a very good husband and father to any children they have. 8) A leopard cannot change its spots.

I read about incels here the internet slang terms were funny to me.

Incel - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org en.m.wikipedia.org
Click to expand...

"Becky, he just gave you an uppercut to the cunt! Look at the bruises!"

"BUT! BUT! HE LOVES ME!! It's MY fault! I didn't clean out all the jizz in his underwear last Sunday like I should have."

You can't reason with dummies like that.
 
CoastTwoCoast said:
"Becky, he just gave you an uppercut to the cunt! Look at the bruises!"

"BUT! BUT! HE LOVES ME!! It's MY fault! I didn't clean out all the jizz in his underwear last Sunday like I should have."

You can't reason with dummies like that.
Click to expand...
it's really sad how easy it is to get trapped in an abusive relationship, and incredibly painful for those that care for them. the harder you try to get them to admit the obvious, the harder they push their denial of reality

I found this to be a really well written piece on the subject

psychopathsandlove.com

Intermittent Reinforcement | Psychopaths and Love

Creating fear of losing the relationship — and then relieving that fear periodically — is a diabolical manipulation known as Intermittent Reinforcement.
psychopathsandlove.com psychopathsandlove.com

and somewhat back on topic, a link relevant to helping everyone that's unable to find a partner to hang in there and find someone that's good for them and to them:

psychopathsandlove.com

Live each day accepting these truths | Psychopaths and Love

You were born with normal human emotional needs, and you have the right to be in mutually fulfilling relationships that meet these needs.
psychopathsandlove.com psychopathsandlove.com
 
SKL said:
Talking about Chad and Stacey in a police interrogation...

The autism is so real
Click to expand...

I meant how they have sub groups of incels like currycel for South Asian/Desi people. Most South Asians I know are either married or they are enjoying being single.

There are also Femcels or women who are incels.
 
It’s mad world ain’t it, I could write a book on all these subjects, should I do that instead of posting in forums about my ideas. I do have a lot of imagination and have lots of ideas running in my head to fix these issues in the world. Some of my ideas I won’t put online as they would be too controversial or would I be seen as fifty shades of stupid? Maybe I’m too idealistic in my thinking and my ideas will never work in future. Who knows.
 
morpher001 said:
calling masculinity toxic just because you dont have much, or any, well thats just sour grapes isnt it?
Click to expand...

well there is a difference between masculinity and toxic masculinity hence the additional word toxic

so i beg to differ as a masculine man who mostly avoids being toxic

you can be toxic anything
 
CoastTwoCoast said:
"Soulmates" is rubbish. There are many people who can possess the qualities you are looking for, not just one person. I don't believe in a soulmate anymore, but someone highly compatible. One person won't have every single thing you're looking for.

The sex has to be great. Sex isn't everything, but it's a huge part. One of my ex's would always cum too fast and I was left feeling unsatisfied. I'd always rationalize like "but he's so nice..." blah blah (and really he wasn't the nicest person in the end anyway). If the sex isn't fulfilling, you gotta move on. Learned that lesson.
Click to expand...


if he dont sort u out hes a bastard

sorry but if someone loves you after they cum they make u cum

period

lol
 
nuttynutskin said:
What in the wild world of sports? My balls just fell off reading some of this drivel.
Click to expand...
SKL said:
He means 'nu-male,' I think, and for the record, I hate almost everything about the post in question and find the alternative routes to intimacy he mentioned to be creepy (although I suppose that's down to this girl as to whether or not she's down for it, so too the nu-male stuff, he's evidently having more success with women than you probably are morpher) but have to hand it to tathra that he is only totally right about "men becom[ing] convinced that sex is the only source of intimacy." Although, this is hardly a male-only problem. There are plenty of women who see sex as the only source of intimacy. The only thing is that they can be derided as sluts whereas it's considered normative for men. This is a dichotomy that's often complained about by feminists, but they miss a larger context: more precisely than being a problem of toxic masculinity, it is a problem of a post-sexual revolution society. In the more traditional view of sex and marriage, sex is definitely not the only source of intimacy. This is only a problem when, again, sex is decoupled from it's natural and societal contexts.
Click to expand...
Agreed nutty. WTF is a 'nu-male'? A man that is castrated or neutered?

If there's actually toxic masculinity, then there's also toxic femininity, toxic trans-identity, toxic intersexuality, and people who claim to be neither male or female who use 'they', or made up words like 'zee', 'latinx', etc. who are toxic.

edit: I Google searched 'nu-male' and this image came up. I met many men like this when I was in academia. They claimed to be 'male feminists', 'queer' or 'male lesbians' despite being heterosexual, not transsexual/TG, and pretended to be for women's rights even though they were into paying to fuck women who were forced via hard drug addictions, or forced and trafficked into being prostitutes-legalising and decriminalised prostitution is legal sexual slavery and sex trafficking of women, men, and people who are not adults. Or they would just pretend to be 'male feminists' in the hope that any woman would actually sleep with them.



I don't think that someone wearing spectacles or having facial hair makes them a 'nu-male' as the image described but we cannot change genetics.
420xWTL
 
Last edited:
theres a food writer in the guardian who identifies as whatever but took katie hopkins to court - funny and satisfying to watch

but now all the articles written by said charcter are about the alcoholism endured yet this problem is shoved on everyone else (telling the shopkeeper to never serve them alcohol- its not the shopkeepers responsibility...) and its their only topic of conversation.

yet

another

label

how about just stop drinking and making it into a drama - lots of people do it and dont blame the world
 
PriestTheyCalledHim said:
Agreed nutty. WTF is a 'nu-male'? A man that is castrated or neutered?

If there's actually toxic masculinity, then there's also toxic femininity, toxic trans-identity, toxic intersexuality, and people who claim to be neither male or female who use 'they', or made up words like 'zee', 'latinx', etc. who are toxic.

edit: I Google searched 'nu-male' and this image came up. I met many men like this when I was in academia. They claimed to be 'male feminists', 'queer' or 'male lesbians' despite being heterosexual, and pretended to be for women's rights even though they were into paying to fuck women who were forced via hard drug addictions, or forced and trafficked into being prostitutes-legalising and decriminalised prostitution is legal sexual slavery and sex trafficking of women, men, and people who are not adults. Or they would just pretend to be 'male feminists' in the hope that any woman would actually sleep with them.



I don't think that someone wearing spectacles or having facial hair makes them a 'nu-male' as the image described but we cannot change genetics.
420xWTL
Click to expand...

The “White Knight” academic SJW situation is real. And yes...more labels...pretty wild how the more we are labeling linguistically the less we are feeling emotionally. Context and intent have all but been lost in lieu of semantics and vapid PC BS.

On a much more important and relevant note:
My dog is an incel, and he’s totes triggered about it on the regular.
 
pofacedhoe said:
well there is a difference between masculinity and toxic masculinity hence the additional word toxic

so i beg to differ as a masculine man who mostly avoids being toxic

you can be toxic anything
Click to expand...
just a heads up that his post is very well known and famous bait. there's no need to respond to it seriously because anyone saying that is acting in bad faith and they know it
 
Twilight222 said:
The “White Knight” academic SJW situation is real. And yes...more labels...pretty wild how the more we are labeling linguistically the less we are feeling emotionally. Context and intent have all but been lost in lieu of semantics and vapid PC BS.

On a much more important and relevant note:
My dog is an incel, and he’s totes triggered about it on the regular.
Click to expand...
That is very true about academia.
 
PriestTheyCalledHim said:
If there's actually toxic masculinity, then there's also toxic femininity, toxic trans-identity, toxic intersexuality, and people who claim to be neither male or female who use 'they', or made up words like 'zee', 'latinx', etc. who are toxic.
Click to expand...

Exactly... PEOPLE are fuckin toxic. :ROFLMAO:
 
morpher001 said:
Do you even realize how contradictory that is to your attitude when it was a frigid woman?
Click to expand...

how is it the same?

if a man has sex with a woman he is in a relationship with then cums and doesn't help her to get hers he is selfish

if some incel calls some woman frigid because she wont have sex with him fullstop those two things are not analogous because these was not consent from one partner in the second example whereas in the first both parties consented

you can cherry pick and twist if you wish
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top