• S E X
    L O V E +
    R E L A T I O N S H I P S


    ❤️ Welcome Guest! ❤️


    Posting Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • SLR Moderators: Senior Staff

Pansexual, bi, gay or just full of shit

jose ribas da silva said:
So did you see that I have addressed this point in other reply? In addition, I have edited my comment to avoid ambiguities, so why are you returning to this point?

So which are your sources to define sexuality, i am still waiting, since you have spoken so eloquently about the subject that it seemed that you have a lot to add to the discussion and now I am curious to hear from you
Click to expand...

Why would I need sources? I'm 90% sure you're trolling now. There is no way you don't know the definition of "sexuality". Fucking google it, man.
 
spare ribs said:
Im long time married goes without saying.
Click to expand...
IdealConsciousGavial-small.gif
 
jose ribas da silva said:
if you speak with a transgender you will see opinions that go against your previous definition
Click to expand...

No, I won't. I know and have spoken with many trans people. Also "a transgender" is a no-no phrase. It's condescending.
I have never defined sexuality on here. What I said to you was an *extremely* basic rudimentary explanation since your lack of knowledge made it pointless to actually explain things properly.
 
jose ribas da silva said:
I am not naive to think that sexuality has a definition, written with words

Sexuality is a particular feature expressed, felt, and manifested differently depending on the person in question
Click to expand...


Sexuality and sexual choice/orientation to me, should not have labels that one has to choose from.
At first we had being hetero/cisexual and there was no other options, then homosexuality came to be acknowledged and accepted, and then now we have several labels and people also create new words to define behaviours that already are defined by an existing word and this is really silly.
I think we should just stop using labels to define this and everyone can find out if a person would have sex with them when they are talking about having sex.
Labels tend to create separate groups and separation leads to hostility.
I see most people are used to use a label to make sure we feel all warm and fuzzy because we are not alone, and people assign themselves many labels to be sure they are conforming to something that will be accepted at least by our fellow label bearers.
I refuse to look at a label list made by someone and pic one out., the concept is alien to my brain and has always been.
I will define myself by my own actions.
 
Phobos said:
Sexuality and sexual choice/orientation to me, should not have labels that one has to choose from.
At first we had being hetero/cisexual and there was no other options, then homosexuality came to be acknowledged and accepted, and then now we have several labels and people also create new words to define behaviours that already are defined by an existing word and this is really silly.
I think we should just stop using labels to define this and everyone can find out if a person would have sex with them when they are talking about having sex.
Labels tend to create separate groups and separation leads to hostility.
I see most people are used to use a label to make sure we feel all warm and fuzzy because we are not alone, and people assign themselves many labels to be sure they are conforming to something that will be accepted at least by our fellow label bearers.
I refuse to look at a label list made by someone and pic one out., the concept is alien to my brain and has always been.
I will define myself by my own actions.
Click to expand...

We NEVER "only had" heterosexuality (cisexual is neither a word nor a thing). Bisexual and homosexual people have existed as long as life has existed. And I intentionally do not say "human life" because it existed in other animal species LONG before homo sapiens ever existed. Homosexuality exists in over 1500 species. Homophobia exists in 1.

Sexuality also never involves "choice". Even if you are bisexual and "choose" to be "straight" or "gay" by being with just one sex, you're still bisexual and didn't choose your sexuality, just who you sleep with. No there is never ever any choice in it.
 
ChemicallyEnhanced said:
We NEVER "only had" heterosexuality (cisexual is neither a word nor a thing). Bisexual and homosexual people have existed as long as life has existed. And I intentionally do not say "human life" because it existed in other animal species LONG before homo sapiens ever existed. Homosexuality exists in over 1500 species. Homophobia exists in 1.

Sexuality also never involves "choice". Even if you are bisexual and "choose" to be "straight" or "gay" by being with just one sex, you're still bisexual and didn't choose your sexuality, just who you sleep with. No there is never ever any choice in it.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry, my mind has trouble speaking about labels as I do not understand them enough as a concept.
I meant we did not accept the concept, and for some labels that are relatively new in everyday use maybe not even the word.
I did not mean that homosexuality was invented at some point.
I studied Latin and Greek literature in high school, so I know very well many types of sexuality always existed and have been considered ok in different times
In Rome at some point it was considered ok for adults to have teenagers as casual partners, in instance.

Regarding the word "choice" I was not clear as I ONLY choose what I like, forgetting that not everyone is like that.
I do not think I have the ability to process the thought of choosing partners through something that's not my attraction towards them.
I would have no partner rather than choosing one of convenience.
Thanks for bringing it up so I could clarify what I meant.
 
Phobos said:
I'm sorry, my mind has trouble speaking about labels as I do not understand them enough as a concept.
I meant we did not accept the concept, and for some labels that are relatively new in everyday use maybe not even the word.
I did not mean that homosexuality was invented at some point.
I studied Latin and Greek literature in high school, so I know very well many types of sexuality always existed and have been considered ok in different times
In Rome at some point it was considered ok for adults to have teenagers as casual partners, in instance.

Regarding the word "choice" I was not clear as I ONLY choose what I like, forgetting that not everyone is like that.
I do not think I have the ability to process the thought of choosing partners through something that's not my attraction towards them.
I would have no partner rather than choosing one of convenience.
Thanks for bringing it up so I could clarify what I meant.
Click to expand...

Ahh, that makes so much more sense! I'm totally with you on that.
Similar to what you said, in Ancient Rome men had sex with men for pleasure and only with women for children. Also, even pedophilia was legal back in medieval times. (NOT trying to link the two in ANY WAY, obviously. One if totally normal and natural and the other is horrible abuse)
I think the only paraphilia that is still legal today is ephebophilia.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top