• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion

    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Pissed_and_messed | Shinji Ikari

Official Paedo Discussion Megathread v2

The court was told earlier that Watkins has been convicted for a total of 90 images of children - two at the highest Level 5, 45 at Level 4, 18 at Level Three, one at Level 2 and 24 at Level 1. He also had 22 graphic images of bestiality.
Click to expand...

But he ain't a paedo. Right?
 
He plead guilty without realising it'd make him look guilty? How the hell can someone be that stupid? Maybe it's possible he genuinely doesn't realise the stuff he's been charged with is fucked up as all get out
 
snolly said:
He plead guilty without realising it'd make him look guilty? How the hell can someone be that stupid? Maybe it's possible he genuinely doesn't realise the stuff he's been charged with is fucked up as all get out
Click to expand...

Maybe he's been advised to emphasise the "I was off my head on drugs, drugs did this to me, it's all down to the drugs, I'm a victim of drugs and teenage adulation" angle for all it's worth? ;)
 
Sammy G said:
Any truly concerned parent would want to know the actual extent of the problem though, wouldn't they?

And seeing as it's far less prevalent than most people seem to believe (and let's restate this - the overwhelming majority of child sex abuse is committed by the victim's family) then surely there's something more than 'trendiness' influencing those who would speak of 'hysteria'?

That's just a database of sex offenders, presented pretty sensationally. It proves nothing other than the fact that there are sex offenders.
Click to expand...

You questioned my statement that offenders get stupid sentences and offend again, the database is evidence of that.

Marmalade said:
How about 5 concenting adults who get off on nailing their scrotums to the table? I'm fine with that too, but appparently the law no longer is.
Click to expand...

Really ?
Im guess on health and safety grounds ? Seems no more risky than a piercing if done with clean nails...
 
soaring peace2 said:
You questioned my statement that offenders get stupid sentences and offend again, the database is evidence of that.
Click to expand...

Does it give any statistics about actual reoffending rates?

I couldn't find any. Certainly nothing to really support your assertion that:

soaring peace2 said:
The 'mass hysteria' as you put it is not an over reaction. There is an awful lot of it about, they get light sentences or suspended sentences and just go on to do it again.
Click to expand...
 
mydrugbuddy said:
Im sorry but i find that very hard to believe. Was it printed by the Daily Fail when Labour were in charge ? :p;)
Click to expand...

my guess wasnt far off, what a complete waste of space that article was, a heating engineer had loads of obscene drawings and a diplomat kept obscene diaries 45 years ago. Fuckin wow. Im so shocked and appalled. :|I dont know why we need such a prominent article with so many words about such relatively trivial things that happened all those years ago. Who the fuck cares about this. This is what i mean by mass hysteria a whole big deal is made of out of anything that can be connected to peadophilia, it is the tabloids that are being hysterical and trivial. This is not a news story, its a desperate attempt to fill a page. They should have rang the fire brigade and asked them if theyd had any cats stuck up trees lately, that would have been more interesting and newsworthy that this load of fucking bilge. :\
 
soaring peace2 said:
They usually mention if they have previous.

Are you actually suggesting that these people don't re-offend ?
Click to expand...

No, and there's nothing whatsoever in my posts to indicate such.

I'm just questioning your own assertion in your earlier post, which I've quoted above for reference purposes.

soaring peace2 said:
Thats 1000 offenders.
Thats not a lot of offenders, but its an awful lot of ruined childhoods.
Click to expand...

Quite. Though I'm not sure how that supports your argument?

mydrugbuddy said:
This is what i mean by mass hysteria a whole big deal is made of out of anything that can be connected to peadophilia, it is the tabloids that are being hysterical and trivial. This is not a news story, its a desperate attempt to fill a page. They should have rang the fire brigade and asked them if theyd had any cats stuck up trees lately, that would have been more interesting and newsworthy that this load of fucking bilge. :\
Click to expand...

Sickening, isn't it?

How about thinking about first world child fucking poverty for a second? Surely that's damaging more kids than any paedophile could ever dream of?

Wait; most of 'em deserve it anyway because they're the offspring of 'chav scum'. They'll probably grow up to rob you anyway.

Back to looking for the paedo under the bed then, eh? :\
 
Last edited:
StoneHappyMonday said:
J
And there was a transcript of a phone call read out in court. The phone call was between Watkins and a woman and made the day AFTER he pleaded guilty. He's joking all the way through, saying stuff like it wasn't rape and it was a load of MEGA LULZ (his word).
Click to expand...

Oh dear. Anyone see them at Reading in 2010?

The phrase "mega lolz" was used by the Lostprophets on some of their T-shirts. The group also performed in front of a backdrop saying MEGA LOLZ! on the main stage of the Reading Festival in 2010.
Click to expand...
 
^ ive no idea what article youve read.

The PIE handbook was printed using govt money and it states that there is nothing wrong with raping children.
One of the prominent members of PIE then went on to advise judges on how sex offenders should be sentenced.
These are facts

If you think people, be they family members or not, raping children is a trivial thing then I pity you.
 
soaring peace2 said:
The PIE handbook was printed using govt money and it states that there is nothing wrong with raping children.
One of the prominent members of PIE then went on to advise judges on how sex offenders should be sentenced.
These are facts
Click to expand...

At the moment they are your words. Please provide exact links that prove your words are facts because it just does look a tad unbelievable until you do. But hey, maybe you are right. I just want to see it in other peoples words from actual proper links. And forgive me for not wanting to stick PIE into a search engine on my PC. I'm not Pete Townshend.
 
soaring peace2 said:
p.i.e link....

http://ukpaedos-exposed.com/p-i-e/
Click to expand...

all i noticed was a heating engineer had loads of obscene drawings and a diplomat kept obscene diaries 45 years ago. It was so full of waffle and irrelevancies i must have missed the actual point of the article. If they had made it clear and concise instead of padded out with paragraphs of completely irrelevant boring shit i might have actually noticed a point to the article.

There very rarely is any point in the daily fail, the main point seems to be that some ugly old jealous shrivelled up prune keeps on slagging off kate middletons dress sense, because she, the writer of the articles thinks she looks so much better and knows so much more about taste and style than kate middleton. I really cannot overstate how much i despise that "news" "paper".
 
That's without taking any extra offences he may have committed into account, too.

PA-18507093JPG-6422617.jpg


The women got 14 and 17 years, respectively.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top