• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion

    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Shambles

Legless Man Kills Girlfriend.

I had to laugh when some one reported this thread for being distasteful. Thankfully the senior staff thought it was just some armless fun.
 
You think?

Anyone see that BBC thingy couple weeks back where they examined the case based on all that's known about the events of that night? Quite alot of the facts are already public because the Pigs in SA mouthed off alot, because of the media frenzy & because alot of information about the events came out during the bail hearing!

Anyway, the guys story has got more holes in it than his girlfriend. First he claims he was too frightened of an intruder to turn the light on! If I was afraid of an intruder the first thing I'd do is turn the light on. He also claims that he fired into the loo door without his legs on, then returned to bed, put his legs on & that's when he noticed Reeva wasn't in bed & he realised it mght have been her in the loo! Then there's talk of lots of rowing going on at the property & Pretoriuses widely known foul temper & impetuousness.

Personally I think he lost his rag during a row in which she locked herself in the lav & he fired rounds through the door in anger. This might explain why the loo door was locked when I wouldnt have thought she'd lock the door in the middle of the night in a familiar place. She locked herself in coz she was afraid of the guy!

That loo door was removed by the pigs as evidence but the defense team hadn't at the time of the TV programme I refer to had a chance to examine the door. The angle that the rounds went through is fundamental to the case for or against Pretorious coz if he can lie about having/not having his legs on that makes his entire story smelly. The pigs have bungled the case in various ways but if there was some kinda actual conspiracy to bury evidence to help him get off then that door will be the hinge if you'll excuse the pun! Simply fire some rounds through some other door, from the height of your average double amputee & offer THAT door up as evidence!
 
Firing a gun through a closed door is attempted murder, or at least reckless endangerment, whichever way you look at it. You don't know, by definition, who is behind there or where they are / which part you are aiming at (so you haven't got the defence that you were specifically intending not to kill).

And who the hell locks the bathroom door in a house they share with only their partner?
 
Ben So Furry said:
He hasn't got a leg to stand on.
Click to expand...
he has a whole collection of legs though. some to stand on, some to walk in and some to run in. perhaps more.

^ but that's all good si. like the fact that the case hinges on a door too. It's brilliant. Law is such a tricky thing. Was it invented by jesuits, I'd say not, it was much sooner than that.

they did give out rather a lot of information, the sort of thing that you would only get to see and hear during the proper trial here. interesting indeed.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top