its not triggering to me either. I guess its due to my recovery program and just where I'm at. I second CH on his opinion.
It's not TDS that is hard to digest, I just vented in here because this is my BL homeThe rough spots are in ADD, OD, CD, PD, TR, and most profoundly the druggy bunch thread.

c.h. I hope your friend is feeling better soon![]()
It's a pretty triggering place if your mind is not stable enough to take the information that gets processed through here.
You should all know what to expect when lurking around TDS...
You have been warned![]()
Yes I'm venturing into dangerous places, not for consumption. I would benefit from a break ! ! Actually this is in process as today is my last day as a moderator, at least for this chapter in time.
I was reading today about social prosthetic systems (SPS), coined by Stephen Kosslyn. Bluelight is my primary, current SPS:
"...SPSs... in which we rely on others to extend our reasoning abilities and to help us regulate and constructively employ our emotions. A good marriage may arise in part because two people can serve as effective SPSs for each other. ... A key element of serving as an SPS is learning how best to help someone. Others who function as your SPSs adapt to your particular needs, desires, and predilections. In short, parts of other people's brains come to serve as extensions of your own brain".
Social Prosthetics!
This person knows they are suffering from it too and it distresses them when they get to the point of experiencing mental clarity and know that they will soon be experiencing the symptoms again.

I can't really begin to imagine just how distressing that is but yes, must be absolutely soul destroying for them. And so hard to watch someone you care about go through that too. Tough.![]()
Fuck me, I know your healthcare system's fucked up but I would have thought there'd be more of a safety net for severe cases like this at least? Never mind the individual if we're being completely mercenary, it would serve a socially useful function for wider society to have such safety nets in place for those who are at the extremes of ( and I hesitate to use the words, not wanting them to be perjorative ) social dysfunction, in a none-contributory sense at least surely? It's a no-brainer. I've not kept up with the Obamacare thing. Is that not improving things or has it yet to go forward properly?
Nail on head, exactly what i was driving at. I don't think you could call a nation truly civilised that did not provide that kind of help as a right to those most in need but ignoring the moral case altogether it makes sound civil and economic sense for a nation to invest in its citizens in a way that promotes a healthy and productive return on that investment to the nation itself as a whole, not to rapacious fucking corporations and big pharma who make a mockery of the word 'care' in health care.

I could talk about this for a long time. Point in case, nationalized health care should exist in the United States. It doesn't particularly because there is a huge racket of people making obscene profits off of the lack of a nationalized health care system.
Barring nationalized health care, people with mental health problems should be able to get help for free, and receive medications for free. Putting a price on mental health burdens people with mental health problems, and it often leaves them in a position to be unable to receive help. Then they are unable to contribute to society in a meaningful way. If they were able to contribute to society in a meaningful way, they would pay taxes, which would cover the cost of giving them medications and help for free. The only difference is that you would have a better society when people get the help they need; the cost wouldn't be any different.