• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Shambles

Yes! Gay marriage finally legal!

Are you on drugs?

I just don't give a shit about what a Lounge mod says, unless he's posting in this thread.

If he posted in this thread, fine. He's part of the discussion then. You copying his posts to this forum and inviting people to air their discontent here is pointless and childish, and contributes nothing to the existing discussion.

So one Lounge mod is a homophobe? Okay.

And youre contibuting exactly what to this discussion by complaining about me? hrmn?

We do it regularly with the XTC forum. Havent seen you complain once when peeps have quoted from over there, I've seen you go along with it and laugh tho

Anyway, you've aired your opinion, which isn't one that's relevant to me. I'll look forward to listening to some that are if they choose to post.
 
Okay. Good.

Can we quit stirring shit about Lounge staff and maybe get back to the discussion that was already in place, instead of slagging off somebody who isn't even participating in the thread?
 
Genuinely really embarrassed. I think maybe its turning to pity now.

[edit]

youre welcome to get on with discussing whatever it is you feel is more relevant ... go for it, no one is stopping you
 
And you do seem to have the record of child-like posting 'ooh ooh I'm going to inject some heroin me, I'm so cool' in just about every thread in EADD in recent times.

Don't recall ever saying that shooting up was cool. 8)

Are you on drugs? Probably not. Poor little lamb.

No, I'm not on drugs. It's mid-morning on a Friday.

How about you delete your off topic rubbish?

Done. If you and Dozzer delete yours. :)
 
Come on guys, have you forgot this threads meant to be about attacking Raas and his beliefs...... ermm, gay marriage I mean :)

@raas - a pleasure to be around :)
 
Done. If you and Dozzer delete yours. :)

I can still see yours, I've deleted mine. And when are you going to stop your ridiculous name calling of Marmalade? It only makes you look like a dick.

So are you going to delete your shit or not? Once you do, this post goes too.

Deal?
 
I'll do mine after sam's done his. tbh, everything he wrote here stands out and makes him look like the douche that he is, but I'll delete all mine after post 94

Forgive the lack of trust but i know him to be a shameless lying arsehole.


You go 1st then I'll follow
 
tbh, everything he wrote here stands out and makes him look like the douche that he is

Keep repeating that, and maybe after a while it'll be true. ;)

Forgive the lack of trust but i know him to be a shameless lying arsehole.

What are you on about? Lying? Grow up.

You could've created a thread for the purpose of discussing a Lounge mod (behind his back). Or you could've addressed it in the Lounge. Which is where people give a shit about what's said in the Lounge. I would've had no problem with that.

Are you beginning to comprehend this yet?
 
What are you on about? Lying? Grow up.
Fuck off. Youre a shameless lying arsehole. And I have every txt from then to prove it. Which I chose not to use to prove your bullshit cos I do have some standards, unlike you, you spineless cunt. (I wasnt talking about the lounge then you muppet)

Are you deleting or not?

Youve got 5 mins. Because then I'm off. Make up your mind up
 
Oh you absolute pathetic piece of shit. How old are you?

Why not ask your buddy Doris the same question? She's the one who did her nut just because I suggested her little campaign against papasomni should be taken to its own thread. Which is all I did.

Anyway, boring...

And I have every txt from then to prove it.

Awww, how sweet! I'm touched. :)

I don't have any of yours. :(
 
Raas, you're a proven idiot and everyone knows your bible shit is for the weak minded. I suggest you toot more smack.

Let me get this straight, I put in a thought out answer based on years of bible reading and research, quoting scripture from both testaments to elucidate a common misconception for the benefit of those who do not understand .... and I'm a "proven idiot."

You give no actual contribution or any kind of structured rebuttle to my answer... ... and you're a genious, right?

Forgive me, for not being particularly offended at your childish responses.


What the fuck are you talking about? You're the one who's completely avoided the questions I put to you about the Christian teachings regarding 'sexual immorality', and particularly the explicit condemnation of the 'effeminate' and 'men who lust after men'.

NO, I specifically said

Raas said:
Now, once you've digested this, I'll move on to sexual deviance and the perversity of homosexuality.

What's the point in a TL: DR post, when you don't even understand the basics?

My post is relevant because I'm directly addressing your response to my NT quotes

Raas said:
**Multiple NT verses addressing OLD Testament vulgarity**
Sammy_G said:
As usual, Christian scripture wriggles out of this through its very ambiguity,

Clearly you don't understand how the bible works, and don't understand the relevance of my NT quotes above. So I have given you a detailed answer in response and trying to progress your limited understanding. Not what you describe a "irrelevant, tangential waffle?".
 
Last edited:
K

You could've created a thread for the purpose of discussing a Lounge mod (behind his back). Or you could've addressed it in the Lounge. Which is where people give a shit about what's said in the Lounge. I would've had no problem with that.

Are you beginning to comprehend this yet?

I did address it in the lounge aswell you blind idiot

4 minutes to delete, then I'll delete mine
 
Last edited:
Raas, you still haven't addressed my post.

I understand 'the basics' quite well as it happens. Probably better than you. I know all about the historical context of the Bible and the customs of the people of the Levant around the time of the OT. It has very little bearing on the scriptures I have quoted.

Please answer my posts instead of being evasive, yeah? And I don't mean 'address the same thing as you did last time and avoid the crux of my argument'. :)

And thanks for getting us back on topic. ;)
 
Top