Would You Do RCs?

[Kurrupt]

No I would not, for two reasons.

Firstly, speedy and hallucinogenic drugs are not up my alley, I'm more of a downer (weed/opiates/benzos) type guy.

Secondly, RCs haven't been used by the general public for long enough to know the long term effects of these drugs on people and their health. Who knows, maybe 2C-i for example causes brain cancer and the guy who's been snorting and eating it every weekend for the last 3 years won't know until he gets it in 20 years. There is no quality control when it comes to RCs either. They are just too mysterious and we are generally too uneducated about them.

That's my take anyways...

 

[DynoSpec]

i would argue that RC's have the same amount of quality control as "street drugs" not made by pharm companies

 

[Bob Loblaw]

2Cs in particular because I consider them "future drugs" of sorts - psychedelics aren't limited to /just/ LSD, mushrooms, DMT, mescaline, etc
Also the amount of research done is encouraging from a safety standpoint so I feel safe

What research? Like the kind found on Erowid saying, "3 Confirmed Deaths From 2C-*"

These are very new compounds, and some are so unresearched, people are forced to make theories based on SAR(?) and whatnot.

 

[Bill Lee]

I've done numerous RCs, and some (like, say 4-ho-met) I am pretty sure are rather harmless while others (like mephedrone) I am quite positive are rather damaging.
But I like to experience new highs.

 

[lightitup]

Hm, I would have to say yes, even though I haven't tried many.

I have smoked DMT, which I guess is classified as an RC some places, as well as JWH-018. I feel like there is so little known about some of these drugs that it is a little intimidating, but it isn't any different than buying "molly" or a pill of X, or a tab of acid. You never know what you are getting, and you could be getting a research chemical a lot without even knowing it. I just think that there are some I wouldn't try, but there are some I feel pretty safe using.

 

[CFC]

save