• Welcome Guest

    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
    Fun 💃 Threads Overdosed? Click
    D R U G   C U L T U R E

Would You Do RCs?

Bob Loblaw said:
carl: Just curious, why wouldn't you dose Phen at all? It's been approved in a few countries.
Click to expand...
I've read quite a few stories about it's duration, and how finicky it's dosing can be. With this substance, I'm not worried about unknown or adverse effects, but rather the duration of the effects.
I prefer shorter acting drugs in most of my other areas of use, so I just don't see myself enjoying this.
 
I'd be interested to hear how it goes.

I pretty much stopped doing anything that lingered longer than 10hr when I finished my AMT years ago. Acid is the rare exception.
Granted, it shouldn't really matter to me, I've managed to remain in opiate dream land for months at a time without complaint.
 
Long acting opiates are different IMO ;). I'll post a TR if it's worthwhile, but that could be hard to do since it is a benzo heh. Long-acting psychs can be a bit unpleasant.
 
I have, and will continue to use certain RC's. I consider some to be much safer than others, without a truly understood basis. I feel if many people have consumed certain chemicals, that my ingestion of the same chemicals a limited amount of times (1-5) most likely wont lead to any harm. I always use a accurate scale, and start low with doses to maximize safety. I usually dont feel like a guinea pig because I choose the more common RC's, and dont ever try a heroic dose. I also examine the molecule of the RC in question next to a comparable drug which has become very common, and check for many similarities before my own experiment takes place.
 
Yes I would try them...after reading as much as I could on it first.

I've done a bit of 4MMC, havent tried any of the others listed as of yet.
 
hell yeah do RCs errday
I have some 2C-I incoming, thankfully. It'll be my first foray into the world of RCs and I'm excited. Got my process down and critiqued so I'll be ready when it arrives.
I choose to do RCs, 2Cs in particular because I consider them "future drugs" of sorts - psychedelics aren't limited to /just/ LSD, mushrooms, DMT, mescaline, etc
Also the amount of research done is encouraging from a safety standpoint so I feel safe
 
well, most 2c's arent very new, and imo wont become nearly as popular as lsd and mushrooms; or else they already would have. When you say the amount of research done is encouraging, are you referring to anything in particular? I dont mean to be a dick or anything just curious.
 
Theres just no way. Even if you have a well-researched RC, theres too much of a risk of getting a contaminated/impure product for my tastes. Incidents like "the frozen addicts" have permanently scared me away from RCs.
 
I once snorted 2C-b after mistaking it for a bit of meth. WOW was that a shock. The first indication that it wasn't what i thought it was is when it hit the back of my sinus and was cold instead of burning. Almost immediately sounds changed and became deeper and started flanging around my head. I don't know if the experience was more intense because i sniffed it or not, I can say that it was a very intense watercolor imitating trip. Like everything was shifting and warping around but i never once felt scared. I far preferred the feeling it gave me over lsd which i have done 100's of times. It only lasted about 4 hours and was visually beautiful in every possible way. I dunno if i would do it again, but i loved it.
 
Feste said:
If it's well researched it would be an RC! & contamination can happen with any drug.
Click to expand...

I don't really understand what you're trying to say with your first comment.

For all intents and purposes, contamination cannot happen with pharmaceuticals. There are always exceptions, but the quality control is as high as possible.
 
Yeah, I have tried mephedrone and would try other RC's given the oppurtunity. I probably wouldn't use them too often but then again I have said that in the past about other things and not stuck to it.
 
Sweet P said:
No. I'm kinda past experimenting with new drugs...

I already have a poly-substance addiction, and frankly, the novelty has gone.
Click to expand...
I know this shouldn't be funny but it is.. great answer! (at least you have a grip on it)

I'd be down to try RCs, never have.. a lot of my friends have done some of the various 2Cs but I've never been right place/time and I don't really wanna go to the sheisty Dallas clubs to get drugs of any kind.. esp. not RCs.
 
The only one that really scares me is mephedrone. The reason why is because it feels amazing to me....like an exact cross between coke and mdma. Methylone is a really nice MDMA substitute, not anywhere near as "magical" but still nice. But meph calls to you in a way that only someone who has been addicted to coke and/or opiates could understand. The heart valves thickening, cardio-toxic issues, and its addictiveness are why it is scary. People who say Meph is a shitty high have not had good meph.
 
2c-i

DynoSpec said:
well, most 2c's arent very new, and imo wont become nearly as popular as lsd and mushrooms; or else they already would have. When you say the amount of research done is encouraging, are you referring to anything in particular? I dont mean to be a dick or anything just curious.
Click to expand...

Oh, I only meant to intimate that /to meeee it seems/ RCs are getting mad popular (again)? and while it's certainly not new, it's very much still novel, to me anyway. I can recall years ago looking for information about drugs and only finding data covering "traditional" drugs. No RCs
As for research, I meant bioassays. For all I've read on the subject, with the exception of long-term, unknown future illness caused by use, trip reports indicate a relatively benign drug
 
dokomo said:
I don't really understand what you're trying to say with your first comment.

For all intents and purposes, contamination cannot happen with pharmaceuticals. There are always exceptions, but the quality control is as high as possible.
Click to expand...

because RCs are not pharmaceuticals. They aren't produced by quality controlled pharmaceutical companies. They are "not for human consumption" which means they are not held to the same quality as medicine or anything that is regulated to quality standards for safe human consumption. They are produced by sometimes careless chemical supply companies concerned only with their bottom dollar. At best these RCs are meant for animal testing, and at worst intended to be used as ingredients in the manufacture of something else. If you think china gives a fuck that some American or Brit may be eating these chemicals and that they should be pure you are not only foolish but incredibly naive.

edit>> don't mean YOU as in dokomo, but as in the subjective reader
 
Last edited:
For all intents and purposes, contamination cannot happen with pharmaceuticals. There are always exceptions, but the quality control is as high as possible.
Click to expand...

But fake pharms containing who-knows-what do exist.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top