psood0nym
Bluelighter
Who am I to say? I guess I'm somebody who understands that textures moving across skin create sensations that feel good? That's presumably why the quote the post I just posted stated "the plastic ring inside rubs against the tip of the penis during intercourse, intensifying the man's orgasm. Subsequently, the prostitutes started charging more for sex with a female condom." That plastic ring increased the man's sexual sensations and orgasm by providing a source of friction for the man to feel. That's why the slogan of ribbed male condoms is "for her pleasure" instead of "for his pleasure." You ask me how I can make that claim? Sorry, but I can make that claim because it's entirely obvious that it's true. It doesn't matter if you're a woman or a man, it's something that can be verified by anything that has nerve endings. I don't know how else to respond.Totally agree.
Ok shit like this is why I stopped posting. Who are you to say "but the reduction is greater for the one wearing it", you're not a woman and I'm not a man, neither of us can make that claim because neither of us really know for sure. Look, you don't have to believe all the female posters, or anyone else, but unless you want to run with the manipulative asshole boyfriend personality, you will simply have to accept it. And maybe have the humility to accept you may not have to truly appreciate someone else's perspective to respect it.
I also don't understand why you're telling me I don't have to "believe" all the female posters' claims, since I've already addressed these claims with logical counter responses. You've just ignored them. I'm not refusing to believe anything. If you take issue with those counter responses the way to advance discussion is to refute them logically point by point as I've asked in this thread before. But you haven't done that, instead you're telling me I "simply have to accept" claims I've already dealt with in detail above without offering any new arguments of your own and claimed that because I'm abiding by the rules of productive debate it makes me a "manipulative asshole." I'm sorry if you don't like the conclusions this thread is leaning towards, but if they're not true and that's so obvious it shouldn't be taking this long to show that's so rationally, should it?