I'm saying it's not an addiction if you don't crave the drug, use it recreationally, or seek out more to get high from it. People will usually become addicted to a drug before becoming dependent on it, and then there are people that take a drug as prescribed and become dependent on it but without being addicted to it.Definition of addiction
noun
[mass noun]
the fact or condition of being addicted to a particular substance or activity
thats the oxford definition, I can see what you are getting at because taking a pill everyday which is prescribed is not necessarily a compulsive behaviour
are you trying to say that its not an addiction because you don't experience withdrawals unless something unforeseen occurs? At the end of the day, if someone separates someone who is dependent on benzo's from their medication for 3 days shit is still going to hit the fan, thats all I see as addiction really.
I don't follow you here.
How do you differentiate addiction and dependency?
There are many people that take benzos as prescribed, don't get high off of them, and wouldn't be taking them if they didn't need it to treat their symptoms. However, even just taking them as prescribed often results in physical dependence on the drug.
Some people are both addicted and dependent on a drug, meaning they get high off of it, use it recreationally, crave it, think about using it a lot, and on top of that they will experience withdrawal symptoms if they don't take it, thus making them dependent on top of addicted.
So for some people taking benzos is no different than a person taking insulin or blood pressure medication. Their bodies need it to function and will experience negative effects if they stop taking it, but it's not something that they want to take or feel good from taking.
That's what I meant by people being dependent on a drug without being addicted to it.