It's that PC tone that moderators are forced in to...
pc? what does this have to do with political correctness. the thread - indeed the site - is focused on harm-reduction. what do your petty insults and ridiculous assumptions and quite erroneous guesses at who i am, what i do and what i know have to do with harm-reduction? you'd do well to ask yourself the same questions you're asking me...
![:\](https://bluelight.org/xf/BL_Images/Orig_Emoji/wrygrin.gif "wry grin :\")
that boring watered down tone devoid of personality that you could write a computer program to do for you. How hard would it be? It could just read the lines of every thread in the forum several times a day, pick up keywords, and spit out stuff like "You have no idea what is in your pill. It is a guessing game. You must test your pills." In fact I think you already have a program like this... It is called "MazDan".
nice attitude. mazdan has put a hell of a lot of hard work and effort into this site over a long time and to write-off his contribution like that with a childish insult devalues your post considerably.
...you would know that purple G's are fake right now, just like everyone knows the fluer-de-lis is fake...
i've made the point and i'll make it again. given the nature of this market, there's simply no way you can make that claim with authority. what you're saying is that you
know for a
fact the contents of every single pill in every region of the world. you know what's in pills in atlanta, ga and juneau, ak and milan and london and adelaide and cape town? of course you don't and to claim you do is absurd.
i'm sorry but, to any reasonable observer, that claim fails the idiot test at the first hurdle.
If you want to tell this guy that rather than avoiding the purple G because everyone knows its fake he should buy it anyway and test it then fine, but that is careless and defeats the purpose of pillreports.com.
perhaps you need to go back and reread what i posted?
Answer me this (hypothetical of course, because I can tell you don't actually buy MDMA. Let's assume that you check ecstasydata and pillreports on a regular basis and have a good idea of whats been going around) - if you were looking for ecstasy and someone offered to sell you a "saint" or "fleur-de-lis" of any color, would you buy it?
i would not buy it because i don't buy my mdma (that you know for sure i don't buy
) from just "someone". also, as i stated elsewhere, i don't base buying decisions
in any way whatsoever on the appearance of a pill.
these hypothetical scenarios are pointless because for every one you create to support your position, it's simple to make up another which supports the contrary position. where does that get us?
i understand you're new to bluelight and you're trying to make a point and, further, you can ridicule me all you want because i learned early on to not take any nonsense like this personally but all you are doing here - yet again - is demonstrating, both with regard to pill contents and now my personal life, that you place faith in speculation and fabrication and that's not how i prefer to roll (pun intended
). i also think it runs counter to bluelight's stated mission.
i asked you in the other thread - (the outpress thread) - to substantiate some of your claims with proof. if there was anything to your claims, the substantiating them should be very easy. some more time has passed and still you either can't or won't. the conclusions start to look obvious...
i'm happy to discuss this with you civilly, but when you choose, instead, to stoop to (incorrect) assumptions about my personal life and personal insults, that speaks volumes about your argument.
if you wish to continue with the same tone, rather than drag this subject off-topic, you can always send me a pm.
alasdair
