• REAGENT TESTING & DRUG CHECKING Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Featured Link 1 Featured Link 2
  • RT&DC Moderators: Senior Staff

Which pill would you recomend?

Wolfy90

Bluelighter
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Messages
546
Its been about 5 months and this coming thursday I will be going to an event so I will deffintely want to roll while there my question is what should I do to prepare myself for the safest roll while still having fun?

My two choices are either blue stars, or purple g ladies but only one or the other not both which one?

I had stars before and they were clean but short lasting while I have yet to try the g ladies but freinds tell me there wild.

has anyone expirmented with either or and would tell me which would be more of the better choice.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Check PR as a lot of the G ladies are reported as fake!

Test you gear before you drop and remember to stay hydrated
 
thanks for the heads up, I know how to roll but your right about them too many damn copy cats.
 
nobody can answer this question in any meaningful way as there's no guarantee that the 'blue stars' you are talking about are the same as the 'blue stars' they're talking about.

pill brands are, for the most part, meaningless.

alasdair
 
The purple G ladies are most definitely pipes. The stars can go either way, but there are too many copies out there. Personally, if you can't test them, I wouldn't eat either.
 
The purple G ladies are most definitely pipes. The stars can go either way, but there are too many copies out there. Personally, if you can't test them, I wouldn't eat either.

not true... i've had the purple G ladies from the first batch... tested MDxx. no watery reaction either...

the truth is they could both be either... so many copy cats. pressed pills are gonna be a thing of the past soon... too many fakes.
 
not true... i've had the purple G ladies from the first batch... tested MDxx. no watery reaction either...

the truth is they could both be either... so many copy cats. pressed pills are gonna be a thing of the past soon... too many fakes.

Yeah, there were some magenta ones that came out that were clean, but those were months ago. It's a safe bet that any purple g's being sold right now are those nasty pipes going around, and those seem to be abundant.

Like I said, I wouldn't take anything without testing, especially in the northeast. And those presses have proven to be very unreliable. You'd have to be crazy not to own a test kit if you eat ecstasy these days. If you can afford a pill, you can afford the kit.
 
foxyloxy55 said:
It's a safe bet that any purple g's being sold right now are those nasty pipes going around, and those seem to be abundant.
you have no idea where this guys lives! even if you did, it's not 'a safe bet' - it's a complete guess...

:\

if people err on the side of caution, then avoiding any pill marked as a purple g has some hr value but, if that's your assumption, then you should just avoid any pill at all and test your pills. which means we're back at square one. pill brands are meaningless...

alasdair
 
you have no idea where this guys lives! even if you did, it's not 'a safe bet' - it's a complete guess...

:\

if people err on the side of caution, then avoiding any pill marked as a purple g has some hr value but, if that's your assumption, then you should just avoid any pill at all and test your pills. which means we're back at square one. pill brands are meaningless...

alasdair

That's exactly what I'm doing... suggesting if he isn't going to test them, he doesn't waste his money, because there is a good chance they are fake. I am huge advocate of testing your pills, I preach it and I practice it. Some people don't have the kits though, and if they don't, I don't see any thing wrong with making a suggestion based on trends on Pill Reports. That's what it's there for, isn't it? It doesn't provide any guarantee, but it can help aid you in buying decisions so you don't waste your money in the first place. The G Lady press is pretty regional, so it's not that hard to guess where he lives. He didn't sound like he was going to be testing them... so my advice is to avoid the purple g ladies if he's not going to be testing them. I don't see the harm in that... It's pretty likely it'll save him money and a bad night...
 
you have no idea where this guys lives! even if you did, it's not 'a safe bet' - it's a complete guess...

:\

if people err on the side of caution, then avoiding any pill marked as a purple g has some hr value but, if that's your assumption, then you should just avoid any pill at all and test your pills. which means we're back at square one. pill brands are meaningless...

alasdair

It's not a complete guess. It couldn't be any more obvious you have no idea what you're talking about every time you make a comment in a discussion about ecstasy.

Purple G's are only going around one region right now, and they are a well known fake with virtually no positive test or user reports. I get that for someone like you who doesn't follow the trends or personally purchase and consume ecstasy that it seems like some big guessing game no matter what, but the fact is there are simply no real purple G's going around, period. If you followed this stuff at all you would know that. Pill brands are not meaningless, and the fact that you come to Pillreports discussion to say that pill brands are meaningless is laughable. It's that PC tone that moderators are forced in to expressing their opinions with so they can adhere to the moderator code - that boring watered down tone devoid of personality that you could write a computer program to do for you. How hard would it be? It could just read the lines of every thread in the forum several times a day, pick up keywords, and spit out stuff like "You have no idea what is in your pill. It is a guessing game. You must test your pills." In fact I think you already have a program like this... It is called "MazDan".

Obviously testing is important, but if you followed pill trends at all (which you don't, and it couldn't be more obvious, and I don't know why you waste your time coming in Pillreports Discussion when you don't follow Pillreports.com) you would know that purple G's are fake right now, just like everyone knows the fluer-de-lis is fake, you don't even need to test it. If you want to tell this guy that rather than avoiding the purple G because everyone knows its fake he should buy it anyway and test it then fine, but that is careless and defeats the purpose of pillreports.com.

Answer me this (hypothetical of course, because I can tell you don't actually buy MDMA. Let's assume that you check ecstasydata and pillreports on a regular basis and have a good idea of whats been going around) - if you were looking for ecstasy and someone offered to sell you a "saint" or "fleur-de-lis" of any color, would you buy it?
 
Last edited:
It's that PC tone that moderators are forced in to...
pc? what does this have to do with political correctness. the thread - indeed the site - is focused on harm-reduction. what do your petty insults and ridiculous assumptions and quite erroneous guesses at who i am, what i do and what i know have to do with harm-reduction? you'd do well to ask yourself the same questions you're asking me... :\
that boring watered down tone devoid of personality that you could write a computer program to do for you. How hard would it be? It could just read the lines of every thread in the forum several times a day, pick up keywords, and spit out stuff like "You have no idea what is in your pill. It is a guessing game. You must test your pills." In fact I think you already have a program like this... It is called "MazDan".
nice attitude. mazdan has put a hell of a lot of hard work and effort into this site over a long time and to write-off his contribution like that with a childish insult devalues your post considerably.
...you would know that purple G's are fake right now, just like everyone knows the fluer-de-lis is fake...
i've made the point and i'll make it again. given the nature of this market, there's simply no way you can make that claim with authority. what you're saying is that you know for a fact the contents of every single pill in every region of the world. you know what's in pills in atlanta, ga and juneau, ak and milan and london and adelaide and cape town? of course you don't and to claim you do is absurd.

i'm sorry but, to any reasonable observer, that claim fails the idiot test at the first hurdle.
If you want to tell this guy that rather than avoiding the purple G because everyone knows its fake he should buy it anyway and test it then fine, but that is careless and defeats the purpose of pillreports.com.
perhaps you need to go back and reread what i posted?
Answer me this (hypothetical of course, because I can tell you don't actually buy MDMA. Let's assume that you check ecstasydata and pillreports on a regular basis and have a good idea of whats been going around) - if you were looking for ecstasy and someone offered to sell you a "saint" or "fleur-de-lis" of any color, would you buy it?
i would not buy it because i don't buy my mdma (that you know for sure i don't buy :\) from just "someone". also, as i stated elsewhere, i don't base buying decisions in any way whatsoever on the appearance of a pill.

these hypothetical scenarios are pointless because for every one you create to support your position, it's simple to make up another which supports the contrary position. where does that get us?

i understand you're new to bluelight and you're trying to make a point and, further, you can ridicule me all you want because i learned early on to not take any nonsense like this personally but all you are doing here - yet again - is demonstrating, both with regard to pill contents and now my personal life, that you place faith in speculation and fabrication and that's not how i prefer to roll (pun intended :) ). i also think it runs counter to bluelight's stated mission.

i asked you in the other thread - (the outpress thread) - to substantiate some of your claims with proof. if there was anything to your claims, the substantiating them should be very easy. some more time has passed and still you either can't or won't. the conclusions start to look obvious...

i'm happy to discuss this with you civilly, but when you choose, instead, to stoop to (incorrect) assumptions about my personal life and personal insults, that speaks volumes about your argument.

if you wish to continue with the same tone, rather than drag this subject off-topic, you can always send me a pm.

alasdair
 
...you would know that purple G's are fake right now, just like everyone knows the fluer-de-lis is fake, you don't even need to test it...
on rereading the thread, you may be surprised to learn that i actually agree, to some extent with this.

but not because you can know 100% that a certain pill is fake based on the imprint but because, if you are going to guess, then it's better to err on the side of caution. not taking a pill because it might be bad is definitely better that taking a pill because it might be good.

but, if you are going to practice this, then we're back to my original point - you should just assume any pill because it might be bad and test your pills. which means we're back at square one. pill brands are meaningless...

my point is quite simple so let me distill it: knowing 100% for sure is better than guessing.

that's it!

i am quite comfortable that my position is consistent with bl's harm-reduction mission. i'm not sure that your position is. if the cost of discussing my position on bluelight is that you feel better about yourself by attempting to belittle me, i can live with that :)

alasdair
 
Top