• ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️



    Film & Television

    Welcome Guest


    ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️
  • ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️
    Forum Rules Film Chit-Chat
    Recently Watched Best Documentaries
    ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️
  • Film & TV Moderators: ghostfreak

Film What's the Last Film You Saw? v. Tell Us What You Thought!

Status
Not open for further replies.
I refused to watch Star Wars for the past 3 years I've been with my boyfriend who's recommended it countless times. I'd always put it on and the sand scene with R2-D2 and C-3PO walking aimlessly through the desert was so beat I just couldn't handle it.

I made it past the desert scene and through all 3 of the originals and I'm moving onto the prequels now. I don't even know what to do with my new found love for Star Wars.
 
you're both wrong.

the movies only work when you watch the OT before the PT. the big reveal in empire, the pinnacle moment in all six movies ONLY works as a surprise, when the PT is all about explaining it, so it should come AFTER.
 
I wonder how many people have PTSD, as a result of being exposed to the horror that is the prequels... If you're going to watch them, watch them first. That way, rather than setting yourself up to be disappointed, you'll be pleasantly surprised. Nobody's going to not watch the prequels. So, it makes sense to approach the series chronologically.

L2R: Everybody already knows that Darth Vader is Luke's father. So your "pinnacle" moment doesn't mean squat... Suck my balls.
 
fair enough.

on second thought, fuck all six movies. yeah, all of them. ditch them and just check out the superb microseries by genndy tartakovski.
 
The only reason I watched it this time was because of the new Planet of the Apes... and then I liked the prequel so much that I decided to watch the originals. The old non computerized graphics just put me off of watching Star Wars but after Planet of the Apes, I was convinced I might actually like it.

I haven't finished the last 2 yet. I was worried that I'd be spoiled by my preferred (newer graphics) and be completely turned off by the old original graphics on Star Wars so I decided to do the originals first. That's how they came out anyway so that's gotta be the appropriate way to watch it? It's how George Lucas meant it to be, and that is how it must be!

But srsly... Jar Jar Binks.. Why? It actually made me want to kill myself. If it wasn't for adorable baby Anakin, I might have.

L2R: Everybody already knows that Darth Vader is Luke's father. So your "pinnacle" moment doesn't mean squat... Suck my balls.

I don't think the Pinnacle moment is Luke finding out who his father is...
 
Last edited:
Pinnacle moment for sure is when Leia makes out with her brother in Empire Strikes Back.


I don't even know what to do with my new found love for Star Wars.

Getting this costume would be a good start ;)
leia1.jpg
 
Sometimes I dress up like Batman.

Miller's Crossing

Tried watching it when I was younger a couple of times. Never got more than halfway through.

I enjoyed it, today.

It's up there with the better gangster movies. Probably in my top 20. Definitely top 50. But I don't like gangster films.

I'd say it's my favorite Coen Brother's non-comedy. But I don't like their non-comedies. So, yeah.

It's okay. There are some really gripping cinematic moments. Albert Finney is fantastic. John Torturro, too. Marcia Gay Harden looks like a monkey, for some reason, in this film. Her nostrils are inflated to twice their normal size. It's weird. Maybe she's had plastic surgery, since. Jon Polito, as always in Coen Brother's films, is fucking fantastic. He's the only comical character. He always plays such a freak in their films. And he does it so well. Gabriel Byrne is shit, as always.

The film is over-directed, like No Country. Joel Coen's directorial style isn't suited to "Academy Award films", in my opinion. Lebowski is perfect. Hudsucker is perfect. Barton Fink is beyond perfect. When he directs drama, it comes across as a little pretentious, at best. Serious Man is the only film I've seen directed by the Coen Brothers that is perfect while not being a comedy, exactly. Serious Man is dramedy. Joel can do that. Straight drama, though.

I don't know. Their dialogue is so inherently absurd, it seems weird hearing it in a serious context. Their characterizations, like Polito's "Casper" character, are often insane and cartoonish. Their not realistic writers of dialogue. They write highly satirical fast-talking scripts, crammed full of wit. And, I'm not sure if they're capable of letting go of that signature style. It's always there. And, in certain contexts it shouldn't be.

Blood Simple, No Country for Old Men, True Grit: Don't like any of them. They all get 2 or less, out of 5. Fargo's good, come to think of it. But still slightly annoying. Like Burton, Joel casts his wife in too many films. She was out of place in Miller's. And she's fucking annoying in Fargo, in that love-hate kind of way. Fargo would get a 3, mainly for Buscemi, that Russian guy, and the wood-chipper.

Meh.

Miller's Crossing: 3.5 stars.

I'm glad I finally sat through it, but I had to take quite a few breaks. Didn't engage with it on an emotional or intellectual level. It's Academy Awards fluff. Very well produced, but - at the same time - very much aware of how well produced it is.

Like No Country, Miller's tries too hard.
 
Safety Not Guaranteed

I never liked Andy Kaufman in Taxi. The cute foreign character is offensive. Reminds me of the manipulation of the African American image. All these one-dimensional Indian characters and Arab characters. Socially inept. Sexually dysfunctional. In desperate need of Western intervention.

Safety Not Guaranteed has it's moments, but I can't get past the characterization of the Indian kid. The actor, whoever he is, shamelessly selling out his ancestry for a role. Nothing positive can be derived, culturally, from his depiction of an Indian youth.

Abed in Community, on the other hand, is a wonderfully conceived character. He uses Western media to bridging the cultural gap, between his father's ethnicity and the United States. He is a product of television. Raised by film. Socially inept, yes. Sexually dysfunctional, sure. But there's a commentary underlying it all. Abed is a character, and an important one at that. He is not merely a clown.

Kenneth, too, is a clown. The primary narrative arc is predictable and patronizing. We are forced to laugh at Kenneth. He is socially inept. Sexually dysfunctional. He has a bad haircut. He is a hardcore Star Wars fan. He wears denim. All these cheap shots. Until, predictably, the tables turn. Suddenly, inexplicable in the context of the narrative, yet utterly predictable, Kenneth transforms. He becomes a musician. Sensitive. Brilliant. Misunderstood. The characters in the film, after mocking him and making a series of justified assumptions based on the available evidence, realize the error of their ways.

That is the moral of the story: don't judge a book by it's cover. Oh, how we disregard the weirdos!

Aubrey Plaza is adorable enough to get me through the movie. Past cringe-worthy montages and cheap jokes made at the expense of it's one-dimensional characters. Safety is a demonstration of how not to be a judgmental asshole. Don't be a judgmental asshole, it says. Take it from me.

Indie bullshit. A film for idiots who think they're smart, and smart people who are really idiots. Like a lot of indie flicks, Safety disguises it's simplicity as complex. Here, Indie means low budget. And nothing more.

2 stars.

Grizzly Man

Werner Herzog's narration is about as pretentious as it gets. Jurgen Haabermaaster, from the Mighty Boosh, comes to mind. The footage of bears is poorly shot. But it's not a documentary about bears. It's a documentary about a repressed homosexual who, in an attempt to run away from himself, re-associates himself with another species. Timothy Treadwell has serious psychological problems. The film exposes him, selectively editing together out-takes from his archives of unpublished footage. Watching it is like reading a dead mental patient's diary. Herzog deserves no credit for producing the film. He is simply exploiting the dead. Taking credit for someone else's story. Taking advantage of an opportunity to advance himself at the expense of his subject. Treadwell deserves no credit, either. He is not a good documentary maker, nor is he a good host. He's unlikable, idiotic, and deranged.

It's an incredible documentary.

3.5 stars.
 
Re-watched What's Eating Gilbert Grape? last night and thought it was as amazing as ever.

Watched The Lazarus Project this morning and thought it was rather odd--At one point I was going to turn it off due to the crappy script, but I gave it a few more minutes and boy was I pleasantly surprised! Basic premise is that a man is given a lethal injection after a crime... And "awakens to a whole new world". Has some religious undertones, but doesn't beat you over the head with it. Well worth the watch.
 
Taken 2

Wasn't expecting much since it was a sequel, but I thought it was as entertaining as the first. If you want a fast-paced, action packed, thriller that doesn't require much thinking then this is just the movie for you. It was about 90 minutes long with 75 minutes of ass-kicking fun.

All the characters reprise their same roles. Kim [Maggie Grace], the daughter in the films, got A LOT hotter since the first movie. She was cute in the first one, but she is HOT in the second one. I was glad I went to see it.
 
Snow White and the Huntsman

thought this was my first time seeing kristen stewart in a movie. but it wasn't.
 
due date with robert downey jr. and zack galifinakisialaodjsjsfsg

it was worth watching for a dumb comedy. these guys are both great actors i loved, so that helped.

i'd say it's up there in terms of dumb comedies.

my friend compared me to zach and he to my lover, RDJ.

basically RDJ befriends a dysfunctional loon because of unlikely circumstances. it's a road film, and the comedy comes with the situations they get into along their road travel.
 
sinister-header-poster-horror-movie.jpg


Pretty good build up but terrible ending, unfortunately. It's like they ran out of ideas half way through the film.:|
 
Just finished watching North by Nortwest for the first time. WTF was up with that ending? I thought that was pretty lame
 
Last edited:
'Cockneys vs Zombies', I must admit that with a title like that I wasn't expecting much from the film and I wasn't disappointed.
What a load of rubbish, avoid at all costs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top