SangerRainsford
Bluelighter
I read an article (I'll dig it out later if I get the chance as it's in a pretty obscure spot with other school stuff 8)) that stated there may be no benefits to fish oils. No harmful effects, but no benefits. The article mainly stated that most of the fish oil on the market is ... inactive? I don't know the right wording for it at the moment, but basically most of the stuff has lost its potency through all the processing it has to go through. It suggested one type of processing over another if you had to get fish oils. I'd go with flax if I were you though--Get the whole seed and grind them fresh to use each day.
as someone who's based a TON on fish oils actually containing roughly the o3's they say, i'd reeaallllyy like to see that article if you can find it
(it'd have to be less than 10% of what the label says to make substituting flax viable, the o3's in flax<ala is most concentrated> are terribly inefficient)
fyasko- phytoestrogens in flax? for real? ugghhh, i abandoned soy products over that mess (can't say i can source the 'concern' for soy, i've never gotten to the bottom of it myself - i just avoid outta caution!)