indigoaura
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2009
- Messages
- 1,707
@Glubrahnum, we need your expertise!
It's not that simple re: saffrole vs pmk based product. Both can be good, and both can be good - at least, that's what it seems like from our research here.
Be very wary of product from the darknet, most of it is shit.
The only thing that's wrong is that it's NOT ACTUALLY MDMA. Fucking bath salt bullshit.
a revision of some of my thoughts on this, way to think about it rather than the precursor or method chosen being the culprit, maybe one synthesis route/precursor over another is easier to fuck up and create the Meh stuff (what I think is probably structural isomers). As in, (I'm making this up) the OG ways you could bend the rules/fuck up a reasonable amount and the product would still come out good, whereas other routes/precursors a slight misstep in the process results in a product that is unknowingly no good. Both ways, or any way, can produce the real McCoy in theory and in that sense MDMA = MDMA still holds true (and regardless of what lies at the bottom of all this, I think that 'll technically still be true), but one route might have a higher propensity to create structural isomers as byproducts by fudging a particularly touchy step.
I don't know shit about chemistry unfortunately, but I can tell real MDMA from bath salt bullshit 10/10. It's real sad to hear they can beat the marquis test.....
I don't know shit about chemistry unfortunately, but I can tell real MDMA from bath salt bullshit 10/10. It's real sad to hear they can beat the marquis test.....
I can,
It looks to me that you, like others are cluelessly overcomplicating things for whatever reason. There is an old saying, All the gear no idea.
first get a 1H spectrum then 2 get a 13C spectrum THEN do 2d hetcor of some flavor.
do it all in D6 DMSO so you see the amine protons.
Post the spectrum, or the FID file or better post the capture folder then anyone with Mestrelab can process it.
otherwise you are wasting everyones time.
quick glance suggests that proton is _H_C(O)-N in N-formyl, showing strong broadening hinting it is near a nitrogen.4NMR .
He said he says he sees a broad peaks at 9 which can only be the amide which means the C=O wasnt touched
quick glance suggests that proton is _H_C(O)-N in N-formyl, showing strong broadening hinting it is near a nitrogen.
is this a definitive Meh sample?
What precousers were used in the sample. If its coming from the BMK route alot of dutch labs have been using this route in recent years with major 500 tons of it seized last year in the netherlands. If it is then im pretty sure all the BMK routes are making MEH mdma cause i know forsure my mdma is made from pmk glycidate and its always magic loving and healing.
this "MDMA" being hard to discern even using GC/MSwoweeee checking out the thread here and reading what is going on after years out of the drug scene,
and I dont know even half as much chemistry, as most of the people on the last page (proper boffins!)
BUT I could decipher and innerstand if I read it, SURE,
And what I can glean from it - this "MDMA" being hard to discern even using GC/MS? :O oh shittt! no wonder people are raving about it trying to fix it, a chemist nerd's wet dream.
THis just goes to show, fuck synthetic drugs. lol seriously, they're more trouble than they're worth. sex and dmt and mushrooms will suffice. heehee
So, @vash445, at this point, your friend can see an obvious difference between a standard MDMA result and this product, but there are no known matches in the database to identify what this product is?
He said he says he sees a broad peaks at 9 which can only be the amide which means the C=O wasnt touched which matches up to what Vecktor said, "_H_C(O)-N"