• MDMA &
    Empathogenic
    Drugs

    Welcome Guest!

What is wrong with the MDMA available today? - v2

drugs tend to be made by people with a passion for profits.
hey listen, as long as we're gonna play the crapitalism game, there's nothing wrong with having a passion for profits. If nothing else this is proof positive that one adds value to others in meaningful ways.
drugs need to be made by people with a passion for drugs.
If history is any indication, I think this is almost always the case, regardless of what Breaking Bad might make it seem like. Or let's just say there are far more “Jesse Pinkman”’s in this world than there are “Walter White”’s by my estimation.

I mean, it's kind of like saying: “food needs to be prepared by chefs with a passion for food.”
then the profits are endless.
Right, what does this even mean?

Passion for profits and passion for drugs are not mutually exclusive.
 
hey listen, as long as we're gonna play the crapitalism game, there's nothing wrong with having a passion for profits. If nothing else this is proof positive that one adds value to others in meaningful ways.

If history is any indication, I think this is almost always the case, regardless of what Breaking Bad might make it seem like. Or let's just say there are far more “Jesse Pinkman”’s in this world than there are “Walter White”’s by my estimation.

I mean, it's kind of like saying: “food needs to be prepared by chefs with a passion for food.”

Right, what does this even mean?

Passion for profits and passion for drugs are not mutually exclusive.
if you want to bring up history, at least go back to the brotherhood of eternal love

what does that mean, if you chase profit you can make some money, but if you chase passion, you will make WAY MORE MONEY. greedy cocksucker shortcuts don't maximize longterm profits
 
I got 1.5g mdma in the form of large chunks of tan crystal. I tested it with one of glass liquid kits and it signalled it was strong MDMA.

It looks like MDMA. It smells/tastes like MDMA. It crushes like MDMA.

But the high is not what I remember. I used to do a lot of 'ecstacy' through 2007-2012. Sometimes it wasn't MDMA, sometimes it was. Usually it was mephodrone(?) when it wasn't MDMA.

BUT I'll tell you what, no pressed pill, nor mdma gel cap ever had such a.. Mild experience to this stuff I've had.

I don't even know if I have 'energy'. It feels like.. Like a half arsed MDMA? It kinda feels like those times years ago but its so mild. My pupils are big but not full on crazy shark eyes like i used to get but my eyes weren't always huge back then too so that's hard to judge.

I dosed myself 120mg + 100mg 2hrs later.

I never dosed caps or anything back in the day or even opened them to visually get an idea of crystal volume, and didn't ever ask what mg of MDMA was in them. Reading online it seemed 100-150mg was an 'average' doss?

I wanted to err on the side of caution but felt I should feel more from this from this dose?

Interestingly too my girl, a very sober person, having smoked weed 3 times in her life and only rarely would have even just one glass of wine, did some of this MDMA too. Im 75kg she's 55kg. I gave her 60mg.

We both enjoyed touching each other and sex was really good, definitely 'enhanced', but it wasn't that insanely magical sex I remember, not even close. Tactile/touching felt good but only maybe 25-50% better, nothing crazy.


So i guess the question is, am I just not going high enough on the dose?

Is this some fake mdma that can pass those liquid test kits(is that a thing?)

Is my mental state just so different from when I was 18-22yo, that I'm not getting the same 'buzz'. For example I had an insatiable sex drive at that age and could already go hard until the sun comes up, having came dozens of times, without any drugs in my system. Im far from that level now, where one or two bouts of sex a day is enough for me.

Is it a deficiency me and my girl both share as we eat almost all the same food? Is there a mineral or vitamin you can be low in that might dull the effects of genuine MDMA?

Also hello again blue light! I joined this forum in 2007 which feels like a long time ago now. I have had so much life experience between now and then it's entertaining reading my own posts to myself from a decade ago.
OP, I went ahead and merged your thread with the existing megathread on this topic.
This is what happens when stupid people come together and form something called the DEA! Fuck laws! God created 10 fucking commandments where as American law and other laws for every other country in the world is in the thousands maybe even millions and it’s stacks and stacks of fucking paper. I get we need rules but Jesus fucking Christ we must love killing trees and creating more clutter with all the fucking paper.

Anyways I could be talking out of my ass but there’s a lot of truth to what i mentioned even if you guys are afraid to agree with me cuz I know how people get and fear isn’t gonna get us anywhere I’m just gonna leave it at that.

I’m gonna get some sleep but I’ll come back more level headed my main point was really to blame the DEA for restricting the ingredients to some of these drugs and thus why the MDMA sucks and the Meth sucks and pretty much they are gonna laugh when they take all our fuckjng freedoms and we can’t do drugs, can’t smoke, alcohol will probably still be available but fuck alcohol i outdrink everyone on any given day and even if I used to enjoy doing it back in the day because it “wowed” everyone.. that shit sucked the next day cuz I was always the one to recover the slowest and I’m sorry but puking sucks ass! Id rather not go through that!

Oh but I’m just gonna rant and rant some more so let me get my sleep and if I have anything useful to add that fucking simplifies my answer ill do that.. till then I’m gonna fall into a coma for I don’t know how long. Let’s find out..
If you could leave the antisemitism at the door, that'd probably make us all feel a little bit better about reading what you have to say.

As well, the political propaganda and rhetoric is better suited for CEPS.
 
Some years ago their was a sudden avalanche of XTC tablets with 250-300mg of material in them. Now, NO producer is going to put in more than they need to and people are not about to pay double... so I had a GOOD look at the current precursors, syntheses and dose-forms. Piperonal, PMK, MDNPe & MDNPa are now almost extinct as precursors; law enforcement has stopped them & it's the people selling high-price but pure powder who snag all that which is still around. Now PMK glycidate is the de facto precursor.

Someone has found what I consider to be a slice of genius - a 1-step route from PMK glycidate to MDMA. Before then, PMK glycidate had to be converted to PMK & reacted with methylamine BUT methylamine has also been clamped down on. Now, PMK is achiral BUT PMK glycidate is chiral so if your 'magic' 1-step synthesis begins with (S) PMK glycidate, your product is (S) MDMA and likewise (R) PMK glycidate yields (R) MDMA. If you take a quick read of the 'MDMA' section of Pihkal, you will discover that (R) MDMA is active, (S) MDMA almost inactive.

The Chinese convert PMK into PMK glycidate via the Darzen's Reaction by reacting it with methyl 2-chloropropanoate. Now, the cheapest way to make methyl 2-chloropropanoate is from methyl 2-hydroxypropanoate which in turn is made from lactic acid.

OK - 2-chloropropanoate, methyl 2-hydroxypropanoate & the starting point, lactic acid, are ALL chiral. If the synthesis is from (S) PMK-glycidate, the product will be (S) MDMA (the less active isomer). Oh, and the natural isomer of lactic acid is natural and so MUCH cheaper..... care to guess WHICH isomer the Chinese use?

I honestly think that the skillset of MDMA chemists has been eroded sufficiently for them not even to know HOW to convert PMK glycidate to PMK. I mean, it's 2 steps BUT you only need to put ⅓ as much material into each pill!

I'm sorry if this has been covered before but it seems that most people still do not understand what is going on. So, as a gift to MDMA lovers everywhere, I offer you 'Empathy', an MDMA mimic that is more euphoric.


We carried out trials right up to stage 2 so hundreds of people tried & loved it. Most were recruited via www.eunoiapharmacopia.com BUT 5APB & 6APB were cheaper to make. Not simpler - in fact it's easier to get pure Empathy than pure APBs because the latter always had some positional isomers mixed in. Now, I know someone sold p,4-dimethylaminorex as 'Serotonia' and we tried it... and it sucked. You see, the p-Me is a potent SERT inhibitor but it has almost no DAT or NET activity. I'm sure people who tried Serotonia noted how mild it was. So the m-Me is a potent DAT/NET inhibitor. The ratios are designed to match up to the ratio of (R) MDMA. The m-Me alone is just a euphoric stimulant. The p-Me alone is like the crappy MDMA we see today.

I guess you only have my word for it but I am quite confident that Chinese RC manufacturers browse these sites and so they will know if this is true or just me lying. I cannot detail the synthesis but benzaldehyde + nitroalkane ---> nitroalcohol+ NaBH4 ---> aminoalcohol + BrCN ----> product. KOCN doesn't work, you end up with substituted urea.

IF Chinese manufacturers want to provide a good precursor, MD-phenyl-2-nitropropane is legal & can be converted to MDA in 1 step, MDMA in 2 steps. What is cool is that their are DOZENS of reactions that will yield MDA (CTH, complex borohydrides, dissolving metal reductions etc....) and MDA ---> MDMA also has DOZENS of options, all simple.

Oh, and 4MAR is an MAOI, AR is not. I asked David Nichols about that detail and I tend to trust his word.

I will conclude by noting that Empathy was legal when we designed & produced it - no laws were broken... we even paid our taxes.
 
Last edited:
Some years ago their was a sudden avalanche of XTC tablets with 250-300mg of material in them. Now, NO producer is going to put in more than they need to and people are not about to pay double... so I had a GOOD look at the current precursors, syntheses and dose-forms. Piperonal, PMK, MDNPe & MDNPa are now almost extinct as precursors; law enforcement has stopped them & it's the people selling high-price but pure powder who snag all that which is still around. Now PMK glycidate is the de facto precursor.

Someone has found what I consider to be a slice of genius - a 1-step route from PMK glycidate to MDMA. Before then, PMK glycidate had to be converted to PMK & reacted with methylamine BUT methylamine has also been clamped down on. Now, PMK is achiral BUT PMK glycidate is chiral so if your 'magic' 1-step synthesis begins with (S) PMK glycidate, your product is (S) MDMA and likewise (R) PMK glycidate yields (R) MDMA. If you take a quick read of the 'MDMA' section of Pihkal, you will discover that (R) MDMA is active, (S) MDMA almost inactive.

The Chinese convert PMK into PMK glycidate via the Darzen's Reaction by reacting it with methyl 2-chloropropanoate. Now, the cheapest way to make methyl 2-chloropropanoate is from methyl 2-hydroxypropanoate which in turn is made from lactic acid.

OK - 2-chloropropanoate, methyl 2-hydroxypropanoate & the starting point, lactic acid, are ALL chiral. If the synthesis is from (S) PMK-glycidate, the product will be (S) MDMA (the less active isomer). Oh, and the natural isomer of lactic acid is natural and so MUCH cheaper..... care to guess WHICH isomer the Chinese use?

I honestly think that the skillset of MDMA chemists has been eroded sufficiently for them not even to know HOW to convert PMK glycidate to PMK. I mean, it's 2 steps BUT you only need to put ⅓ as much material into each pill!

I'm sorry if this has been covered before but it seems that most people still do not understand what is going on. So, as a gift to MDMA lovers everywhere, I offer you 'Empathy', an MDMA mimic that is more euphoric.


We carried out trials right up to stage 2 so hundreds of people tried & loved it. Most were recruited via www.eunoiapharmacopia.com BUT 5APB & 6APB were cheaper to make. Not simpler - in fact it's easier to get pure Empathy than pure APBs because the latter always had some positional isomers mixed in. Now, I know someone sold p,4-dimethylaminorex as 'Serotonia' and we tried it... and it sucked. You see, the p-Me is a potent SERT inhibitor but it has almost no DAT or NET activity. I'm sure people who tried Serotonia noted how mild it was. So the m-Me is a potent DAT/NET inhibitor. The ratios are designed to match up to the ratio of (R) MDMA. The m-Me alone is just a euphoric stimulant. The p-Me alone is like the crappy MDMA we see today.

I guess you only have my word for it but I am quite confident that Chinese RC manufacturers browse these sites and so they will know if this is true or just me lying. I cannot detail the synthesis but benzaldehyde + nitroalkane ---> nitroalcohol+ NaBH4 ---> aminoalcohol + BrCN ----> product. KOCN doesn't work, you end up with substituted urea.

IF Chinese manufacturers want to provide a good precursor, MD-phenyl-2-nitropropane is legal & can be converted to MDA in 1 step, MDMA in 2 steps. What is cool is that their are DOZENS of reactions that will yield MDA (CTH, complex borohydrides, dissolving metal reductions etc....) and MDA ---> MDMA also has DOZENS of options, all simple.

Oh, and 4MAR is an MAOI, AR is not. I asked David Nichols about that detail and I tend to trust his word.

I will conclude by noting that Empathy was legal when we designed & produced it - no laws were broken... we even paid our taxes.

If you take a quick look at PIHKAL, you’ll see S-MDMA is the more active of the two..

Also many others have stated the conversion to PMK would negate any chirality of the starting glycidate. This shouldn’t change whether done one pot/step or not.

-GC
 
Just read this gem on the International Energy Control website, followed by a list of the known chemicals they can quantify.

We cannot quantify substances sent in as unknown. Please do not purchase a quantification before knowing the composition of the sample.

Wait, what?

How are you supposed to know the composition of a sample you are sending in to identify? Isn't that the point of the lab testing?
 
Someone has found what I consider to be a slice of genius - a 1-step route from PMK glycidate to MDMA. Before then, PMK glycidate had to be converted to PMK & reacted with methylamine BUT methylamine has also been clamped down on. Now, PMK is achiral BUT PMK glycidate is chiral so if your 'magic' 1-step synthesis begins with (S) PMK glycidate, your product is (S) MDMA and likewise (R) PMK glycidate yields (R) MDMA. If you take a quick read of the 'MDMA' section of Pihkal, you will discover that (R) MDMA is active, (S) MDMA almost inactive.

The Chinese convert PMK into PMK glycidate via the Darzen's Reaction by reacting it with methyl 2-chloropropanoate. Now, the cheapest way to make methyl 2-chloropropanoate is from methyl 2-hydroxypropanoate which in turn is made from lactic acid.

OK - 2-chloropropanoate, methyl 2-hydroxypropanoate & the starting point, lactic acid, are ALL chiral. If the synthesis is from (S) PMK-glycidate, the product will be (S) MDMA (the less active isomer). Oh, and the natural isomer of lactic acid is natural and so MUCH cheaper..... care to guess WHICH isomer the Chinese use?

The isomer ratio theory is actually the only one that seems to have been definitively disproved. To quote myself from a few pages ago:

We actually did get the the answer to this happily enough:
New science just dropped: https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/dta.3118

I know the thread has moved onto other theories since, but it's nice to be able to close off some old ones. Checking 97 samples seized in Germany from 2019-2020, MDMA was found to be extremely racemic.
dta3118-fig-0003-m.jpg


From the old thread, we can also see that this was true in the past as well.
kmNlP3v.png

Batch five was seized in 2006, batch 45 in 2011.
To preempt some counterpoints I'll quote a response I made when I originally posted this.
97 samples across two years. Different form factors and batches.
MDMA specimens were seized either as tablets of various colors (n = 63), in crystalline form (n = 30), or as powder (n = 1). Some seizures contained both tablets and crystalline samples.
You might be aware of this, but the majority of the worlds MDMA is produced in Europe. I doubt every sample in the study was produced locally in Germany (or even the majority of them), the largest labs are in Belgium and NL. You can certainly find arrests where people are moving large quantities of MDMA across the border into Germany. Even the paper acknowledges this:
Amphetamine and MDMA on the German market originate mainly from the Netherlands, where it is synthesized from various non-pharmaceutical precursors
If you know how to read a box and whiskers plot, you can see how racemic all of the samples were. There aren't the outliers that would indicate the presence of even a single mildly enantiomeric sample. So yes, I think we can infer a few things about the racemic status of the mass market MDMA produced in Europe, especially the stuff produced in the labs located close to Germany that supply most of the world.
 
Just read this gem on the International Energy Control website, followed by a list of the known chemicals they can quantify.



Wait, what?

How are you supposed to know the composition of a sample you are sending in to identify? Isn't that the point of the lab testing?

Sorry to quote myself, but this is continuing to blow my mind.

What if you have a white powder and you think it is MDA, but it is actually 5-APB. If you send it to their lab for quantification and tell them it is MDA, what happens? Are they that dependent on what you tell them the sample is?
 
If you take a quick look at PIHKAL, you’ll see S-MDMA is the more active of the two..

Also many others have stated the conversion to PMK would negate any chirality of the starting glycidate. This shouldn’t change whether done one pot/step or not.

-GC

The point I made was that the new synthesis does not proceed via PMK. You are quite right though, it is the (S) that is the active - but for all the others it's (R), my mistake.

Hydrolysis yields a diol which quickly rearranges to the ketone which is how PMK is regenerated BUT the epoxide ring can be converted to an N-methyl aziridine which can be opened to an imine which is reduced with a complex borohydride. It's not a reaction I paid much attention to but their has to be a proton shift so I suspect it was first predicted and then someone finally found the conditions.

But I guess the simplest way is to simply get a sample of PMK glycidate and measure it's optical rotation. If it's non-zero, the material isn't raecemic. Simple.
 
The point I made was that the new synthesis does not proceed via PMK. You are quite right though, it is the (S) that is the active - but for all the others it's (R), my mistake.

Hydrolysis yields a diol which quickly rearranges to the ketone which is how PMK is regenerated BUT the epoxide ring can be converted to an N-methyl aziridine which can be opened to an imine which is reduced with a complex borohydride. It's not a reaction I paid much attention to but their has to be a proton shift so I suspect it was first predicted and then someone finally found the conditions.

But I guess the simplest way is to simply get a sample of PMK glycidate and measure it's optical rotation. If it's non-zero, the material isn't raecemic. Simple.

The MDMA being produced by the big Euro labs that use PMK glycidate is all racemic though.
 
Feel free to just quote the relevant passage from that PDF. I didn't see anything in that document regarding isomers/enantiomers, chirality..
No - but it does refer to the fact that PMK isn't a commonly used intermediate.

PEAs can be made in dozens of ways but what EVERY producer wants is a 1-step route. While methylamine was available, PMK was a 1-step synthesis. Now it isn't.

If you don't understand WHAT you are looking for, don't be surprised if you cannot find it.


Maybe the above is simple enough for you to grasp. It's what is termed 'weight of evidence' and unless you can explain why MDMA (chirality unverified but structure confirmed)) in 300mg dose-units still only producing minor effects, I would love to hear a better answer.

I also note you carefully avoided my detailed explaination of the Darzen's Condensation.

It's almost like you didn't bother to read it....
 

What you didn't read was my previous post where I posted a detailed paper measuring the isomer ratios of MDMA samples in Europe. Maybe third time's the charm. It's frustrating because this is the one thing we actually have data for.

We actually did get the the answer to this happily enough:
New science just dropped: https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/dta.3118

I know the thread has moved onto other theories since, but it's nice to be able to close off some old ones. Checking 97 samples seized in Germany from 2019-2020, MDMA was found to be extremely racemic.
dta3118-fig-0003-m.jpg


From the old thread, we can also see that this was true in the past as well.
kmNlP3v.png

Batch five was seized in 2006, batch 45 in 2011.
To preempt some counterpoints I'll quote a response I made when I originally posted this.
97 samples across two years. Different form factors and batches.
MDMA specimens were seized either as tablets of various colors (n = 63), in crystalline form (n = 30), or as powder (n = 1). Some seizures contained both tablets and crystalline samples.
You might be aware of this, but the majority of the worlds MDMA is produced in Europe. I doubt every sample in the study was produced locally in Germany (or even the majority of them), the largest labs are in Belgium and NL. You can certainly find arrests where people are moving large quantities of MDMA across the border into Germany. Even the paper acknowledges this:
Amphetamine and MDMA on the German market originate mainly from the Netherlands, where it is synthesized from various non-pharmaceutical precursors
If you know how to read a box and whiskers plot, you can see how racemic all of the samples were. There aren't the outliers that would indicate the presence of even a single mildly enantiomeric sample. So yes, I think we can infer a few things about the racemic status of the mass market MDMA produced in Europe, especially the stuff produced in the labs located close to Germany that supply most of the world.
 
NO producer is going to put in more than they need to and people are not about to pay double...
No, this is not entirely true. For a number of years in the early 2000s, MDMA production was rampant. Then things tightened around the supply of sassafras-oil-producing plants/roots. PMK-glycidate became the new precursor as it was arguably closer to MDP-2-P than safrole ever was. One would have to vacuum distill sassafras oil to get safrole, then isomerize that to isosafrole, and then stick a double bond oxygen where there was an allylbenzene to arrive finally at MDP-2-P, and then reductive amination at last.

With PMK-glycidate, a reflux with HCl returns it to PMK. It's easier to work with.
Piperonal, PMK, MDNPe & MDNPa are now almost extinct as precursors; law enforcement has stopped them & it's the people selling high-price but pure powder who snag all that which is still around.
LE has just made it more difficult to acquire these chemicals. There is and will continue to be natural precursor oils.
Now PMK glycidate is the de facto precursor.
It was just a semi-clever way to disguise a List I precursor. Glycidates are formed via the Darzen reaction, it's in the wikipedia article for glycidates. So your conjecture is that so-called drug chemists are taking PMK-glycidate and going straight for MDMA from there? If this were the case, and if it had the effect on stereoselectivity you claim, then I would expect the data @Negi posted to reflect that in seized MDMA samples' chirality. Instead it overwhelmingly shows racemic MDMA seizures. Are we sure some of these reductive aminations don't output racemic products regardless?
Someone has found what I consider to be a slice of genius - a 1-step route from PMK glycidate to MDMA. Before then, PMK glycidate had to be converted to PMK & reacted with methylamine BUT methylamine has also been clamped down on.
Ok, this is not that difficult. As previously shown, PMK-glycidate → PMK is just a simple reflux with HCl. Methylamine can be synthesized on its own in a number of ways, some of them quite clever and done in situ.
I honestly think that the skillset of MDMA chemists has been eroded sufficiently for them not even to know HOW to convert PMK glycidate to PMK. I mean, it's 2 steps BUT you only need to put ⅓ as much material into each pill!
I have no clue about the skill set of MDMA chemists in 2022. I sincerely hope the average competency is higher than what you're suggesting.
I'm sorry if this has been covered before but it seems that most people still do not understand what is going on. So, as a gift to MDMA lovers everywhere, I offer you 'Empathy', an MDMA mimic that is more euphoric.
Okay so it's a blend of 3'-methyl-aminorex (what you're calling m-Me) and 4'-methyl-aminorex (what you termed p-Me, I guess that's “para-methyl”). The 3'-MAR acts on dopamine and adrenaline while the 4'-MAR works on serotonin with no cross-interference like the 5-APB + 6-APB combo? Jesus Christ those are probably a huge pain in the ass to produce, likely involving something hella dangerous like cyanogen bromide. Funny enough, there's a one-pot synthesis of trans-4-methylaminorex from PPA by forming a urea intermediate with KOCN and then quenching that with HCl, but it sound like you're might be familiar with this route.
We carried out trials right up to stage 2 so hundreds of people tried & loved it. Most were recruited via www.eunoiapharmacopia.com BUT 5APB & 6APB were cheaper to make. Not simpler - in fact it's easier to get pure Empathy than pure APBs because the latter always had some positional isomers mixed in. Now, I know someone sold p,4-dimethylaminorex as 'Serotonia' and we tried it... and it sucked.
You might say that. It killed a couple dozen people and was notorious for sending people into serotonin syndrome days after it was taken.
You see, the p-Me is a potent SERT inhibitor but it has almost no DAT or NET activity. I'm sure people who tried Serotonia noted how mild it was.
Generally it didn't seem like it was at all worth the danger and trouble. Those who were hospitalised might not categorize the drug as "mild" though…
So the m-Me is a potent DAT/NET inhibitor. The ratios are designed to match up to the ratio of (R) MDMA. The m-Me alone is just a euphoric stimulant. The p-Me alone is like the crappy MDMA we see today.
Crappy MDMA is nothing new. Every generation thinks their generation is experiencing something novel with MDMA, when it's the same assortment from good to bad since it's debut on the black market.
The truth is: dl-3,4-MDMA .hcl will always be dl-3,4-MDMA.hcl, and International Energy Control provides an insipid, overpriced, and unsatisfactory service whose limited scope effectively serves no merit to the inquiring minds on this thread as the matter sits currently, arguably leading instead to confusion.
I went perusing online and discovered that one can acquire a functioning, used GC-MS setup for somewhere around $6,000 USD. Just putting that out there.
aminoalcohol + BrCN ----> product.
Goddammit, see? I knew it would come down to cyanogen bromide. This stuff is both toxic and unstable.
KOCN doesn't work, you end up with substituted urea.
You know after you form the urea you can quench it with equimolar HCl to punch out the trans enantiomer of these drugs (most likely)?
What is cool is that their are DOZENS of reactions that will yield MDA (CTH, complex borohydrides, dissolving metal reductions etc....) and MDA ---> MDMA also has DOZENS of options, all simple.
The yields going this route are less than impressive from what I recall. Much smarter to go from ketone to MDMA directly instead of attempting to go from primary amine to secondary
 
Last edited:
if you want to bring up history, at least go back to the brotherhood of eternal love
Oh yes, let's examine that, shall we? And how did things end for our lofty Brotherhood of Ironically Eternal Love? To borrow the summation from Wikipedia: "Their activities came to an end on August 5, 1972, when a drug raid was executed on the group where dozens of group members in California, Oregon and Maui were arrested. Some who had escaped the raid continued underground or fled abroad. More members were arrested in 1994 and 1996, and the last of them in 2009".

There are of course people who get in and back out of the game. But the thing there is you'll never know who they are because they got back out of the game properly.
what does that mean,
The question was rhetorical and meant to point out that your statement is something of a platitude.
if you chase profit you can make some money, but if you chase passion, you will make WAY MORE MONEY.
Well, so doesn't this just incentivize based on profit anyway? So in the long run, the "greedy" capitalist move here would be to "chase passion". But seriously think about that for a second: how often is it a good idea to "chase" passion rather than build into a field of work and specialize until one can trade that speciality knowledge and experience in for higher earnings?
greedy cocksucker shortcuts don't maximize longterm profits
Right, this is what I was saying. Someone claiming they make drugs "passionately" (and presumably to a high standard of quality) when in fact they also know that this passion for high standards ultimately leads to the highest profit, what's actually their incentive? It's not like any of this is some act of altruism. If people are willing to take on the enormous risk of drug production and sales, it's only fair they charge to make profit on their wares… Acts of civil disobedience are one thing, but no one should commit felonies for free.
 
Last edited:
I have to admit that your annotation made it very hard to read. I really could have just taken your repost as is, not a comment on EVERY sentence.

Maybe calm down and write something that doesn't have implicit triple exclamation marks after every sentence? Maybe actually do some research -if only for the novelty value.

I have remained polite to all. I don't intend to get into a discussion with anyone too puerile to manage that. Maybe you should do some research - if only for the novelty value?

Your mistakes, lies, inaccuracies and bias are all too numerous for me to sift through.
 
I also note you carefully avoided my detailed explaination of the Darzen's Condensation.

It's almost like you didn't bother to read it....
I think it's just that you're making a moot point when all these seized sample do not reflect any changes in the racemic consistency of blackmarket MDMA.
Maybe the above is simple enough for you to grasp. It's what is termed 'weight of evidence' and unless you can explain why MDMA (chirality unverified but structure confirmed)) in 300mg dose-units still only producing minor effects, I would love to hear a better answer.
Do note that what you're talking about here is a subjective, “qualitative effects” comment. These cannot be disputed nor can they be confirmed due to their very subjective nature. There are too many biases to rule out. Way back in the 90s, there were these giant 500 mg wafers called Disco Biscuits that were scored horizontally and vertically so you could break them into 125 mg fourths of MDMA each fairly easily, but of course people would skull the whole thing anyway and chew up the insides of their cheeks without realizing it… I remember by the turn of the century all the pills in the U.S. it seemed like were double- and triple-pressed stamped tablet pills of every color of the rainbow and every major corporate logo you could imagine. Some of those had to have been absolutely loaded down with MDMA. Also, when pills had 110 mg in them back in the 90s, we'd eat two at a time sometimes…
 
I have to admit that your annotation made it very hard to read. I really could have just taken your repost as is, not a comment on EVERY sentence.

Maybe calm down and write something that doesn't have implicit triple exclamation marks after every sentence? Maybe actually do some research -if only for the novelty value.

I have remained polite to all. I don't intend to get into a discussion with anyone too puerile to manage that. Maybe you should do some research - if only for the novelty value?

Your mistakes, lies, inaccuracies and bias are all too numerous for me to sift through.
I was praising your insight despite not agreeing with your overall assertion. You don't need to insult me, that's just rude. Implicit exclamation marks? :middle finger:
 
Last edited:
Top