What about that Andrew Tate eh?

[someguyontheinternet]

Trans and drag queens going to schools promoting being trans is borderline grooming

They're reading to children not promoting being trans. Maybe you should stop listening to what the media is telling you to be scared of?

 

[Soso78]

They're reading to children not promoting being trans. Maybe you should stop listening to what the media is telling you to be scared of?

I don’t believe anything anymore.
I know I wouldn’t let my young child be educated by a man with potential mental health problems dressed as a woman.
Stay the fuck out the schools.

 

[elgoucho9]

They're reading to children not promoting being trans. Maybe you should stop listening to what the media is telling you to be scared of?

Primary aged children are the most impressionable age group there is.

What happens when you show a toddler a cowboy? They want to dress like one...

Kids like to pretend to be all sorts. What happens when you start talking gender fluidity in schools to primary kids...

You wind up with alot of kids who want to be X, Y and Z. Then grow up to regret it in later life.

We're currently saying that you can't vote under the age of 18. But you can have a sex change. And the NHS will help pay for it.

I don't know anyone in real life who doesn't think this whole thing is fucked up.

 

[ageingpartyfiend]

I don’t believe anything anymore.
I know I wouldn’t let my young child be educated by a man with potential mental health problems dressed as a woman.
Stay the fuck out the schools.

Everyone has potential mental health problems
I reckon at least 50% of people actually do have them, possibly many more.
It's definitely hard to believe anything anymore though

Re Tate, I dunno what he has or has not done, cos as said, who to believe? but merely listening to his actual words tells me he's an utter cunt of the highest order

My guess is he's traumatised somehow and that's shit. Nevertheless he's truly grim, ugh

 

[Soso78]

Everyone has potential mental health problems
I reckon at least 50% of people actually do have them, possibly many more.
It's definitely hard to believe anything anymore though

Re Tate, I dunno what he has or has not done, cos as said, who to believe? but merely listening to his actual words tells me he's an utter cunt of the highest order

My guess is he's traumatised somehow and that's shit. Nevertheless he's truly grim, ugh

What does he say that u dislike.
I mainly see him telling people not to trust the government and stop being slaves to the system and telling young men to be more manly.
Like less of a pussy lol good advice I think

 

[ageingpartyfiend]

What does he say that u dislike.
I mainly see him telling people not to trust the government and stop being slaves to the system and telling young men to be more manly.
Like less of a pussy lol good advice I think

Primarily his alpha assertions, ego fantasises and misogynistic poison

I'm not gonna make myself feel ill again listening to to him for quotes etc,

 

[Soso78]

Alpha males aren’t a bad thing are they?

 

[ageingpartyfiend]

Alpha males aren’t a bad thing are they?

Not per se, no.

Some of them (like some of any group) are utter cunts though. Like Tate.

 

[Soso78]

I heard someone argue he was a misogynist because he didn’t want a gf that had been fucked by loads of men.
I think he’s right

 

[ageingpartyfiend]

I heard someone argue he was a misogynist because he didn’t want a gf that had been fucked by loads of men.
I think he’s right

yeah I guess that would be a reasonable response from you to that, (kind of anyway - how would that scenario work in reverse for you?)

But that's not why I think (know) that he's a (deeply and unpleasantly) misogynist cunt though.

 

[TheUltimateFixx]

Here's a chemtrail left by a UFO!!




Oh, hang on, it's just a cloud.

Strange things happen when water vapour interacts with air temperature and pressure gradients.

The same strange things also occur when aircraft release water vapour.


I believe its called 'physics'

This is why science is cool af.

 

[someguyontheinternet]

Yea I have no idea how people think he's intelligent and articulate

This interview was streamed live, it was hilarious. It basically ended up with Tate whining about how unfun Hasan is because Tate can't formulate any rational arguments

If you want to see some of his opinions on women here's an interview he did

 

[Soso78]

yeah I guess that would be a reasonable response from you to that, (kind of anyway - how would that scenario work in reverse for you?)

But that's not why I think (know) that he's a (deeply and unpleasantly) misogynist cunt though.

Works both ways. I don’t want a gf that’s had loads of partners probably because I haven’t had loads of partner myself.
It’s like that pornstar that let the guy fuck his gf.
Csnt get my head round thst. Tate called him a cuck and I agree

 

[TheUltimateFixx]

I heard someone argue he was a misogynist because he didn’t want a gf that had been fucked by loads of men.
I think he’s right

Yeeeaahh. That's very unpleasantly equating a human being to purchasable goods and makes me cringe just to read. 'oh but I want a brand new factory one that's FRESH OUT OF THE WRAPPER and nobody ever touched because otherwise it's USED AND DIRTY'.

.. Revolting. And yes absolutely misogynist because nobody ever applies that standard to men. You won't read fundamentalist religious tracts about how the MAN has to be 'pure' before the wedding or else he's nothing more than second-rate used goods and unworthy of his wife.

I don't care what the sexual history of my partner is; and I'm not so insecure as to feel somehow demeaned if they've had previous relationships.

All in all, when looking for something permanent, you're more likely to find it if both of you have been around the block for a bit, because you'll have had time to work out what exactly you want and stop being hung up on some juvenile porn / fairy tale fantasy.
And if all you're after is a casual bit of fun -? A bit of practical experience beats clueless shy fumbling every time.

 

[ageingpartyfiend]

If you want to see some of his opinions on women here's an interview he did

It's like Tate's awareness is stuck in a tube that he just cannot exit, nor can anything else enter.

Embarrassing 'debate' lmfao, guy is fucked in the head.

I'm just vaping some lovely weed and around 15 minutes in, inteviewer makes an anguished attempt to explain a simple concept to Tate and says something about the earth being either flat or round...I had a little vision of @AutoTripper appearing in one of those little boxes, raising a finger and "Ahem, the earth happens to be neither of those commonly held misconceptions, but is in all the very undoubted already-revealed and realised certainty, merely a crater, a tiny part of a much larger, 'Real' earth"

I'd like to see what Andrew would make of that. (No offence AutoTripper I'm stoned af, hopefully I havent misrepresented you but I'm sure I remember some crater assertions,

 

[TheUltimateFixx]

Works both ways. I don’t want a gf that’s had loads of partners probably because I haven’t had loads of partner myself.

That's insecurity talking. You're measuring your sexual 'worth' by your mileage. Insignificant.

It’s like that pornstar that let the guy fuck his gf.
Csnt get my head round thst. Tate called him a cuck and I agree

I'd say that's the very OPPOSITE of a cuck. The guy wasn't 'cuckolded' , which implies stuff went on behind his back, without his knowledge, and to his shame.

Instead he apparently actively encouraged that thing to take place. Which to me indicates supreme confidence in himself (she can get with whoever but at the end of the day she'll still be attracted to ME). Plus plenty of couples have a kink for watching their partner getting it on with someone else. I certainly like it but our fidelity is never in question.

 

[Soso78]

Yeeeaahh. That's very unpleasantly equating a human being to purchasable goods and makes me cringe just to read. 'oh but I want a brand new factory one that's FRESH OUT OF THE WRAPPER and nobody ever touched because otherwise it's USED AND DIRTY'.

.. Revolting. And yes absolutely misogynist because nobody ever applies that standard to men. You won't read fundamentalist religious tracts about how the MAN has to be 'pure' before the wedding or else he's nothing more than second-rate used goods and unworthy of his wife.

I don't care what the sexual history of my partner is; and I'm not so insecure as to feel somehow demeaned if they've had previous relationships.

All in all, when looking for something permanent, you're more likely to find it if both of you have been around the block for a bit, because you'll have had time to work out what exactly you want and stop being hung up on some juvenile porn / fairy tale fantasy.
And if all you're after is a casual bit of fun -? A bit of practical experience beats clueless shy fumbling every time.

I think I’m quite old fashioned when it comes to relationships and sex.
I like the thought of being in a relationship where we are both committed to each other.
I guess jealousy and pride come on to it too. There’s no way I’d want a relationship with someone that is fucking other men.
I’m not particularly insecure I just don’t share my woman.

 

[Soso78]

That's insecurity talking. You're measuring your sexual 'worth' by your mileage. Insignificant.

I'd say that's the very OPPOSITE of a cuck. The guy wasn't 'cuckolded' , which implies stuff went on behind his back, without his knowledge, and to his shame.

Instead he apparently actively encouraged that thing to take place. Which to me indicates supreme confidence in himself (she can get with whoever but at the end of the day she'll still be attracted to ME). Plus plenty of couples have a kink for watching their partner getting it on with someone else. I certainly like it but our fidelity is never in question.

Fidelity means loyalty to a partner so if she’s getting dicked down by other guys her fidelity is definitely in question.

 

[TheUltimateFixx]

Fidelity means loyalty to a partner so if she’s getting dicked down by other guys her fidelity is definitely in question.

You're failing to make a distinction between emotional commitment and fucking around. Me and my 'significant other' have an 'open relationship' when comes to sex. We both like to get with other people at times. But there's NEVER any dishonesty, or sneaking around behind each other's backs, nor is the relationship EVER in question. We know where the heart belongs and always will. Anything else is just a bit of extra spice that we share.

 

[Soso78]

You're failing to make a distinction between emotional commitment and fucking around. Me and my 'significant other' have an 'open relationship' when comes to sex. We both like to get with other people at times. But there's NEVER any dishonesty, or sneaking around behind each other's backs, nor is the relationship EVER in question. We know where the heart belongs and always will. Anything else is just a bit of extra spice that we share.

Ye like I said I think I’m just old fashioned.
If you’re both ok with it then it’s a good match, better than one or both lying snd cheating.
How long have yous been together?
Does she make them use condoms or she come home with next man’s load in her?