• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion

    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Pissed_and_messed | Shinji Ikari

What about that Andrew Tate eh?

Well, it would have to be worldwide conspiracy dating back over 50 years. That would require GENERATIONS of people who have for some ill-defined reasons left 'chemtrails' whereas Occam's Razor would suggest something else.

When you burn a hydrocarbon in air, one of the products is water. If the air is sufficiently cold, the water will be cooled and become a vapour.

Two sentences. As I previously stated, apophrenia is something you should apply critical thinking to.

If it's supposed to be covert, why leave trails at all? What, they have been at it 50+ years and haven't solved THAT issue?
 
AutoTripper said:
Does nobody see this too?

I NEVER saw this in 1980's, don't recall, it from 1990's, was aware in 2000's but was hardly apparent here.

Leap day 2016 29/02/2016 Monday morning, is when it really kicked off here.

Now, it's fully cloud seeded Grim blackening day. Job done.

Click to expand...

i see it.

but that picture tells us nothing about what those trails contain and, i fear, you are assuming what they contain.

you live in the uk, autotripper, correct? i am not trying to dox you but what part of the country do you live in? what is the nearest big town (say with 10 or 15 miles)?

alasdair
 
alasdairm said:
i see it.

but that picture tells us nothing about what those trails contain and, i fear, you are assuming what they contain.

you live in the uk, autotripper, correct? i am not trying to dox you but what part of the country do you live in? what is the nearest big town (say with 10 or 15 miles)?

alasdair
Click to expand...
Mate, never hesitate. We won't always agree but you'll never irritate or offend me.

I appreciate you a lot too.

Bedford is about 60 miles North West of London,

While Luton, birthplace of Andrew Tate I looked today on the flight route map, sits in a straight line just over 50% of way to v centre of London.
 
i just took a quick look at flightradar24 and there are about 24 planes in the sky over about a 25 mile radius around bedford.

maybe those trails are just regular contrails...

in the 1980s, air travel in and out of the u.k. accounted for about 40-50 million passengers. in 2022 that number was 224 million. the skies are busier.

alasdair
 
Aircraft fly along 'tracks' which change each day based on atmospheric conditions i.e. they don't choose the shortest route, they choose the CHEAPEST route (wind direction, wind speed, barometric pressure, weather patterns and so on) so even being 60 miles from an airport doesn't mean that the days track to given destinations won't all be over a small area.

One day in the Atlas mountains in Morocco (so way, way from anywhere) we saw 6 flights pass over in an hour.

It turned out that something technical had happened and Algerian airspace was closed. So all the flights between West Africa and Europe had to divert to a new track. Look at a map. This was a time where overflight of Libya was NOT a good plan. 92-93 I'm guessing,

I remember it was a still hot day with a cloudless sky in June so in that bright sunlight you could see each aircraft passing. Those trains were visible for a long time. I don't recall just how long, but enough for each of us to remark upon it. Evidently we were below a track.

IF I intended to covertly spread some noxious chemical, I would simply dissolve it in oil. Then their would be no trail. That isn't to say aircraft don't sometimes have to dump fuel, but the trails from that are generally gone within a couple of minutes. Although in theory it's the 'last option' (it costs money), I suspect that if they develop a non-critical (but requires fixing before next takeoff), they will divert to an airport where they have their OWN ground crew (it saves money) & they are overweight for landing, they might be tempted to lighten the load... which would be a disgrace but not some worldwide conspiracy.
 
Last edited:
I was wicked at art younger. I've lost the technical ability now, a 2016 optic nerve injury irreversibly altered how my brain and perception works, as the optic nerve plays such a role in how we experience and perceive reality.

Aesthetic pleasure became no more though, no cheap thrill dopamine materialistic even vain sight-seeing just information duty and process.


A secret blessing though welcoming me to forget life's glitzy shiny rewarding distractions, and go deep inside. It's too hard to explain espec in typing over such gulfs.

I can see the same but it's like say, having a sore knee, walking isn't much fun.

So the fun in having eyes vanished replaced with the grating intensity of sensory nerve damage.

Part of the brain too, mental emotional problems mega deep chemical depression, anxiety.


I adapted, learned to live with, and I do not regret it. It forced me to evolve, so far outside any comfort zone.




So unable to draw sketch paint how used to. Still I thought I'd have a crack.

It's by no means perfect, not actually bad though mainly.


I've counted and red pen numbered too, impossible otherwise to tally up.

I'm sure there are many more not tallied, in view and buried by light, ALSO same time out front door, up street, all ways. Equal number again.

I mean you'll see I've tallied 23 being conservative too added some +'s and a ?



Include the whole 360° and from clear trail free sky 4:30 am by 7 am in an area no airports near v low domestic air traffic spot too...





 
Also wrt how long I consider, this conspiracy you call it reality is my word, has been going on like how far back are it's roots?

1 yr! 5, 15, 20? 40? Surely not. 100 no way.

Too right. Back to bloody Horus, minimum. I'm no Historian so I dunno how many millenia that would be now.

But let's forget Horus and all the successors and begin, with good old Jesus. Mr.Vertebrae number 33!


Pretend that was Horus no. 1.

So in my book, this "design" I will call it, has been running 2023 years, give or take.
 
US official "Rainmakers" centuries back one successful one. Pumping chemicals into the atmosphere, to manipulate the weather.

Even Wiki cannot lie here.

I linked this one vs less MSM brainwashing sources but if don't want to take Wiki's word look about it checks out.

en.wikipedia.org

Charles Hatfield - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
 
AutoTripper said:
US official "Rainmakers" centuries back one successful one. Pumping chemicals into the atmosphere, to manipulate the weather.

Even Wiki cannot lie here.
Click to expand...

Why would anyone lie? Seeding moist air was first theorized over 130 years ago and tested almost 80 years ago. Silver iodide & potassium iodide were the most commonly used agent but the sheer amounts needed limited the size of any given study and the results weren't significant.

Producing rain in a drought-ridden nation could save vast numbers of lives, but it doesn't work. Yes, sometimes it raided afterwards, but not statistically more than usual.
 
Soso78 said:
The thought of ur partners ass being used by other men is just grim.
Click to expand...
This particular sentence just struck me again in retrospect. THAT'S how you think of it? 'Being used' -?

Welp, perhaps to your surprise I wouldn't wanna see that EITHER.
The thing is nobody is USING anybody. I'm not pimping him out ffs.
We're mostly talking threesomes here; and every now and again one of us going off with a third party with the other's full consent. (That would apply where some bloke he fancies just isn't my type, or if I wanna get with a girl, 'cause he's not interested in girls.)
Soso78 said:
I feel bad for you that sex is so meaningless to you.
Click to expand...
Strange in that case that YOU'RE the one putting it in such incredibly demeaning terms.

Sex is just sex. It's only ever as 'meaningful' as the person you're having it with. I can enjoy a bit of sheer animalistic fun with anyone. 'making love' is a thing that only happens with my partner.
 
TheUltimateFixx said:
This particular sentence just struck me again in retrospect. THAT'S how you think of it? 'Being used' -?
Click to expand...
I feel like you've just stated the root cause of misogyny. Men feel like they own women and they don't want their toys to be used by other men

Some men view women as objects who don't gave feelings or thoughts of their own. They obviously don't enjoy sex right, it's about the man getting his nut
 
someguyontheinternet said:
I feel like you've just stated the root cause of misogyny. Men feel like they own women and they don't want their toys to be used by other men

Some men view women as objects who don't gave feelings or thoughts of their own. They obviously don't enjoy sex right, it's about the man getting his nut
Click to expand...
Like, some of those types may find they get off on getting their name tattooed onto women. Maybe.
 
someguyontheinternet said:
I feel like you've just stated the root cause of misogyny. Men feel like they own women and they don't want their toys to be used by other men
Click to expand...
It's not about ownership. I don't automatically gain sole 'possession' of my partner's body because we're an item. Not unless both parties share that viewpoint.
And if someone thought the mere act of having sex somehow 'defiles' me to the point where he/she wouldn't wanna touch me.

.... I'd not be having a relationship with that person.
someguyontheinternet said:
Some men view women as objects They obviously don't enjoy sex right
Click to expand...
Suuure. Xd

... Tell me you never made a woman cum without telling me you never made a woman cum.

Literally I came across this total incel post where some bloke claimed women don't enjoy sex because he slept with allegedly 97 women and NONE of them apparently enjoyed it.....

... Yeah that's a 'you' problem, mate.
 
Last edited:
Yes I think you hit the nail on the head, me as no my gf both feel the same. She wouldn’t like me fucking someone else and I feel the same.
I like that we’re enough for eachother on every level including sexually.
If you and your partner are ok just hooking with others for sex than it’s good u have each other.
It’s just not for us
 
Tate had/has the opinion that women take too long to make a baby. I think he said two weeks is the longest he'd justify waiting for his woman to finish making a baby to stay monogamous. If she takes longer than two weeks then it means he sleeps with another woman.
 
w01fg4ng said:
Tate had/has the opinion that women take too long to make a baby. I think he said two weeks is the longest he'd justify waiting for his woman to finish making a baby to stay monogamous. If she takes longer than two weeks then it means he sleeps with another woman.
Click to expand...
Damn women, fkin slackers
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top