US Drug Czar Stepping down, possibly not being replaced

Care

Bluelight Crew
Joined
May 19, 2008
Messages
5,506
Location
Hella
WASHINGTON -- U.S. drug czar Gil Kerlikowske is leaving office unceremoniously, forgotten long before he was ever known to most Americans.

But for those leading the push to legalize marijuana, he’ll be remembered as the tough-talking former police chief from Seattle who never yielded on the question of legalization, always warning of the health dangers linked to smoking pot. That stance put him at odds with the growing majority of Americans who now back legalization.

As Kerlikowske, 63, heads for a possible job as the U.S. Customs and Border Protection commissioner, his exit prompts suggestions that America’s drug czar has become irrelevant and whether President Barack Obama should bother with a replacement.

“One of the most helpful things the president can do right now is to not spend money on filling that position,” said Seattle City Attorney Pete Holmes, whose office stopped prosecuting misdemeanor marijuana cases in 2010.

But legalization opponents say it would be a mistake to eliminate the office. They see it as a crucial vehicle for making clear to Americans the dangers and damages of a wide range of other drugs – from methamphetamine to cocaine to heroin – that the U.S. public wants kept illegal. Kevin Sabet, who served as an adviser on drug issues to Obama and former Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton, said the drug czar could serve as “a powerful conduit for the direction of drug policy.”

http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/08/12/3553043/as-drug-czar-exits-does-us-really.html#storylink=cpy

Its pure conjecture at this point to say that he wont be replaced, but it is a rather odd coincidence with Holder announcing that he wants to lower or get rid of mandatory minimum sentences. Is it possible that with teh skyrocketing cost of maintaining prisons, and the shifting US public opinion towards marijuana, that the administration sees relaxing drug laws as a winning issue?


Methinks I smell some change in the air with regard to US drug policy.

Front page material?
 
Yea he did essentially although that was way back in the 80's, times have changed it seems.
 
Either way, its clear that things are changing. 10 years ago this would have caused mass outrage. Even if it fails (which I dont think it will) it will make it easier and even more apparent that things need to change when the issue come up later down the line.
 
Drugs will be legal one day. The world is ever evolving and gets more and more liberated from restrictive beliefs and laws. Who would of ever thought that we would see gay marriage becoming legal? It may take a long time, but as we progress, drugs will have their day. Maybe one year, maybe ten years, hell- maybe even 100 years later. Point is, IT WILL HAPPEN.

Every dog has his day.
 
I tend to disagree with most of the statements about our policies "progressing". For every step forward, we take two back. The 40s and 50s were UBER-CONSERVATIVE, which is a stark contrast to the anything-goes 60s and 70s.

Then the pendulum swung back around in the 80s. For those who don't remember, it was a decade riddled with crack, AIDS, ultra-conservatism and drug raids unlike any in the history of America. Giant black helicopters descending on pot farms in the Emerald Triangle...battering rams busting down doors of 'suspected' crack dealers. Just awful.

The same thing goes for other social issues like abortion. The fact that personal liberties are even up for a vote should tell you something's very wrong.

/Debbie Downer out
 
comment posted to the article:

stonernation.com said:
Of course we need a Drug Czar. Even though I strongly support Marijuana legalization there is still a lot of illegal drugs that I want stopped in this country.

I just want them to use the efforts to stop marijuana and put those efforts towards more serious drugs. Use the money from taxing marijuana and do more education for Marijuana and Alcohol and keep everything away from anyone under 21.

I've been seeing more and more of this point of view from marijuana people. I'm surprised that it survived multiple decades of repression and persecution.

After getting beat down for your predilections for multiple decades, how can you turn around and beat others down for their predilections?
 
After getting beat down for your predilections for multiple decades, how can you turn around and beat others down for their predilections?

Racism. Even the people who want everything decriminalized and still illegal to sell are supporting a model where the people incarcerated will rarely by white. The "just pot" people are really bad for ignoring the racial implications their plan.
The drug war needs to be dismantled or its going to look racist as hell.
 
comment posted to the article:



I've been seeing more and more of this point of view from marijuana people. I'm surprised that it survived multiple decades of repression and persecution.

After getting beat down for your predilections for multiple decades, how can you turn around and beat others down for their predilections?

I think its just the price you pay for being more mainstream.
 
I've been seeing more and more of this point of view from marijuana people. I'm surprised that it survived multiple decades of repression and persecution.

After getting beat down for your predilections for multiple decades, how can you turn around and beat others down for their predilections?

Yeah, this is very sad but true. Cannabis is very much on the border between the mainstream, socially-acceptable drugs and what I think of as minority drugs, and is moving fast towards the former. Once it is legalized and joins the caffeine-and-alcohol camp, I can see some very hard times for illicit drug users. They will be a much smaller minority and it will make them easier to persecute.
 
Top