WASHINGTON -- U.S. drug czar Gil Kerlikowske is leaving office unceremoniously, forgotten long before he was ever known to most Americans.
But for those leading the push to legalize marijuana, he’ll be remembered as the tough-talking former police chief from Seattle who never yielded on the question of legalization, always warning of the health dangers linked to smoking pot. That stance put him at odds with the growing majority of Americans who now back legalization.
As Kerlikowske, 63, heads for a possible job as the U.S. Customs and Border Protection commissioner, his exit prompts suggestions that America’s drug czar has become irrelevant and whether President Barack Obama should bother with a replacement.
“One of the most helpful things the president can do right now is to not spend money on filling that position,” said Seattle City Attorney Pete Holmes, whose office stopped prosecuting misdemeanor marijuana cases in 2010.
But legalization opponents say it would be a mistake to eliminate the office. They see it as a crucial vehicle for making clear to Americans the dangers and damages of a wide range of other drugs – from methamphetamine to cocaine to heroin – that the U.S. public wants kept illegal. Kevin Sabet, who served as an adviser on drug issues to Obama and former Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton, said the drug czar could serve as “a powerful conduit for the direction of drug policy.”
http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/08/12/3553043/as-drug-czar-exits-does-us-really.html#storylink=cpy
Its pure conjecture at this point to say that he wont be replaced, but it is a rather odd coincidence with Holder announcing that he wants to lower or get rid of mandatory minimum sentences. Is it possible that with teh skyrocketing cost of maintaining prisons, and the shifting US public opinion towards marijuana, that the administration sees relaxing drug laws as a winning issue?
Methinks I smell some change in the air with regard to US drug policy.
Front page material?
