azzazza !?
Bluelighter
Agreed, but language is always no more than approximation. The best we can do is use mathematics. During a week of Zen meditation with people I tried to come up with a mathematical model for relating illumination to approaching infinity, it seemed I came close but never succeeded.
There is a documentary about that called dangerous knowledge about physicists and mathematicians trying to come up with brilliant theorems and models related to mysticism or universal workings and God, it drove many of the insane in the end.
you should have a look at set theory (especially its creator; Georg Cantor (ended up mad) and such thought-provocing tidbits as the Russell Paradox). what wonderful and problematic attempt at this it is.
perhaps the most universal aspect of a +4 would be a 'breach' (or at least a crack) in the 'ego wall' (ie. the rationalised, structured, ex-plained world one lives in) that continues to defy all attempts at rationalisation or irrationalisation. It simply won't fit in, and neither can it be discarded as hallucination. it just remains in its essence an infinitly dense, undividable, inaccesible 'point' in the mind, yet it continues to spill over from within itself in (again) infinite approximations of itself whenever one contemplates it.