fastandbulbous
Bluelight Crew
eCsTaSy NoN sToP wrote:
pray tell, how would you make a fly or hemi-fly out of MDMA? unless you can turn chemistry on its head, i don't see how you're gonna attach a furan to the 4,5 carbons... you know, seeing as how the 4 carbon has the md ring attached to it... mm... yeah, plus let's think a bit about the activity of MDMA... ya know, the lone electrons on the oxygens.. attaching a furan to the 4,5 would have another exposed oxygen.. no way, no how... or are you suggesting that the furan rings share the oxygens on the md ring? no, serious, what are you trying to say? or are you simply daydreaming and know nothing about chem?
You've still got a chip on your shoulder about the ALD-52 hydrolysis thread (Heirarchy of LSD), haven't you? Well lets see... first of all, learn to read, dear boy. In your enthusiasm to call me a chemistry simpleton you didn't read my post properly - I wasn't talking about MDMA, I was talking about DMMDA (see structures below)
and as you can see, it is possible to get DMMDA to form a hemi-dragonfly structure, but not DMMDA-2 (because DMMDA contains the essential 2,5-dimethoxy substituents and is unsubstituted at pos 6.
Secondly, why would you want to make a hemi-dragonfly of MDMA (even if you could)? The dragonflies & hemi-dragonflies are very potent 5HT2a agonists, but MDMA has bog all activity at the 5HT2a receptor - it acts on the SERT and DAT systems, effectively putting them into reverse and causing an efflux of serotonin and dopamine.
As for the comment about daydreaming and making up things in chemistry, I do check what I write before commiting it for public scrutiny, ensuring that I've got the facts correct (or as near as dammit). When you do what you've done, and use incorrect facts to take a condecending approach in an attempt to belittle others, it just makes you look like a complete egotistical windbag. You were incorrect before, and incorrect again - next time, before going off half-cocked try taking a little time to think about what you've read and are about to write. That way you can learn a few things, rather than just ranting because your pride was hurt.
PS Had you been civil in your questioning, I wouldn't have made a point of highlighting all the bits you were incorrect about. Get over yourself - everybody is wrong at some point, but the people interested in the science, and not just inflating their ego learn from it and move on.
Give it a try sometime
Last edited:
