psood0nym
Bluelighter
It was getting late and I worked pretty early the next morning so I wanted to both shorten it and be able to blow my nose if it accelerated too quickly. My original timing involved only using the 4-ho-NMT, but when that resulted in a lackluster--though still pleasant--experience, I went for the 4-ho-DMT. Also, because the onset time is significantly quicker, and the onset of each additional dose is more palpable, I was able to titrate this first time dose to what I was sensationally extrapolating would be a decent level with greater precision. You may be right about insufflation modifying the experience, but I ended up enjoying it immensely in any case, as I figured I would. Even if I had used it orally, I had still combined it with 4-ho-NMT, and there is no telling how that affected it at this point either. Insufflated 4-AcO-DMT doses are about 50 percent stronger than oral proportional to weight and about 1/3 shorter (for me) if you're looking for a--likely pretty translatable--conversion constant for oral 4-ho-DMT. Qualitatively it's a rougher onset with a more stimulating plateau, with the AcO.MagickalKat777 said:Can I ask why you insufflated them when, at least for psilocin, they're plenty active orally?
It's true; it does not burn at all.
Last edited: