honestly everything from that source you posted I can't take seriously. he wants She-Hulk in the Avengers? WTF she would be a horrible choice, far too cartoony to be fleshed out on the silver screen
this Avengers movie excelled because it was as real as a movie about God-like people saving the world from Invader(s) from another dimension/planet could be. I will support this by pointing to the fact of how troubled our heroes are/were in this movies, and also point to the fact that they seldom got along in the beginning and there were a lot Avenger VS Avenger fight scenes...
BUT to get real nerdy here (hoped this wouldn't happen), the current onslaught of Marvel Comics heroes movies and this Avengers movies aren't truly based on Avengers #1 and the subsequent issues that followed. that would be lame in all the ways in that old cartoon version of the DC Comics Justice League (Batman, Green Lantern, Superman, AQUAMAN, et al) can prove to be...
this Avengers movie and the single heroes movie is essentially based upon the Ultimates, which was produced when Marvel re-vamped all of their classic heroes and started from scratch with all of their respective tales. so essentially, writers could give a whole new, updated, origin on these characters. these titles I'm speaking of were called Ultimate Spider-Man, Ultimate X-Men, etc and the Avengers were changed to the ULTIMATES, where...
Nick Fury, once again the head of operations here, was changed to weird looking buff white dude with an eye patch to Samuel fucking L Jackson with an eye patch:
the comics writers/artists said they imagined this new, black, Nick Fury as Samuel L - that much is obvious
I mean, it's totally better than that gawd-awful 1998 made-for-TV movie Nick Fury: Agent of SHIELD that starred, hilariously, the Hoff
and it's even better than the lame, white, version of Nick Fury way before in beginning of Avengers up to the 2000s:
normally the re-imagining of the origin of any story that is held near and dear to the hearts of many is a bad, BAD idea - but Marvel pulled it off with grace. mostly because the characters became more real - this was about a super-hero group, the Avengers, in a mordern terrorist-riddled post-9/11 World... you know,
our world
so if one is going to boycott this movie over something absurd, I think this is the route one should go
btw - Samuel L killed it in his depiction of Fury. about the role Jackson commented: "It's always good to play somebody that is a positive in society as opposed to somebody who is a negative. . . I tried to make him as honest to the story and as honest to what real-life would seem." Jackson compared the character to Ordell in Jackie Brown, calling him "a nice guy to hang out with, you just don't want to cross him" (bad ass)