• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

The 2018 Trump Presidency thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Some political lady just knocked on my door and ask me what's my number one goal for the elections... without even thinking I said "getting rid of trump..." and she said "I've been doing this everyday for the last 2 months and 99% of people say the exact same thing."

Ha! I had two different groups hit my house this weekend, both pushing Democrats and complimenting me on all the neighborly Dems in the area. I haven't seen/heard anyone coming around pushing Republicans.
 
you cant stop people from being bigoted douchebags and spewing hate. people are free to think and express themselves however they like - within reason, ofc, your rights end where another's begin; nobody has the right to express themselves with violence against others, for example (ie, "its my deeply held religious belief that non-whites/non-straights/non-christians/etc are inferior biengs, created by Satan, and its our holy duty to wipe them from the face of this Paradise left to us by God!"). what is meant is that they believe that organized and systemic bigotry and oppression should be allowed, even encouraged.

I'm not religious by any means (unless God exists and I'm going to hell for not believing in him- sorry GOD!)


The Bible and Christianity and other sects etc etc do play a part in how deeply religious (and not do much) judge what is good and what is bad.

My father and grandparents are homophobic, my gay 85 yo uncle never came out and is totally private about his long term partner who recently died from dementia.

Yes there are racists, bigots around, the intergenerational effect cant be ruled out as some older people do not think they are racist or sexist etc any more now than they have been all their lives.

Women are just as capable as men to look after themselves and their families yet were seen as needing a man and marriage etc for older people raised in that fashion.



Trump doesnt stand out as a racist or sexist at all, hes 70 or so, he stands out as a rich American

The whole horror at "grab em by the pussy" was a bit over the top, bloke speak is bloke speak so correct me if I am wrong, that was taken from a private conversation and lampooned as he then went on to win office?

Well, geez, my Dad says the C word and says gross shit about women in "man convos with my brother in law but is the total opposite with everyone else.

Trump is just a guy, after all, blokes can be crass with each other, who really cares?
 
Ha! I had two different groups hit my house this weekend, both pushing Democrats and complimenting me on all the neighborly Dems in the area. I haven't seen/heard anyone coming around pushing Republicans.

I slammed the door on the last Dem that knocked at my place.

Was going to cuss and scream.

Ended up voting for A DIFFERENT DEMOCRAT.
 
I can't really bring myself to read this thread, so I'll assume someone addressed Nikki Haley just quitting as ambassador to the UN?
I really hope Trump doesn't run with her as VP. It might work.

If the Dems don't flip the House then we are v likely to have Trump for another four years. Ugh.
 
I can't really bring myself to read this thread, so I'll assume someone addressed Nikki Haley just quitting as ambassador to the UN?
I really hope Trump doesn't run with her as VP. It might work.

If the Dems don't flip the House then we are v likely to have Trump for another four years. Ugh.

I don't think anyone has addressed it, and I would expect it to be it's own thread. Rumors abound as to why she quit the position. I've still not heard much of the reasoning, nor the anticipated impact. More of a wait and see, still.

But, yeah, if she ran as his VP I think he'd be a slam dunk for 4'mo years. That'd be great!
 
Fuck that narcissistic shithead Trump. I have never once said the word "president" before his name... Not my prez. I won't rest until that piece of shit who is riding on Obama's economy is out of the OUR white house. I really do think that George Bush Jr. thought he was doing the right thing. I feel Trump tries hard to hurt certain people on purpose... That is something a horrible human being would do.

I consider myself a political junkie but I hate talking about politics with other people... especially people that I don't agree with because I hate to fight over politics. I really don't mean to offend anyone. I just can't stand Trump... he makes me so damn sick. I have never said anything even close about another President before. I did not really care for George Bush Jr. but I never thought he was evil.
 
Last edited:
Pretty obvious to me. She doesn't want to be there the morning after the 6th of November. Leaving before the midterms makes it look like she's leaving on a 'high note".

She's also trying to preserve her reputation. When she runs for President in 2024, either against an incumbent Democrat or after Trumps second term... by then, her footprint on the trump admin will be quite small. There for her to minimize and say she resigned before the Mueller report even came out...or if his presidency doesn't crumble it'll be there to say she did her duty blah blah.
 
I've also heard it said she left so Trump has a window to replace the position with his nominee prior to the midterm elections. Nobody I've heard of has given any indication that Trump pushed her out, nor that she chose to leave based on anything related to her views on Trump. All the talk of her moving to position herself for political office in the future is a lot of guesswork, from what I gather. Really, I've heard nothing that gives a solid reason to her resignation other than she is in serious debt that can be addressed by switching to work in the private sector. Even that isn't substantiated as far as I know.
 
I can't really bring myself to read this thread, so I'll assume someone addressed Nikki Haley just quitting as ambassador to the UN?
I really hope Trump doesn't run with her as VP. It might work.

If the Dems don't flip the House then we are v likely to have Trump for another four years. Ugh.

What, Haley quit?

Why isn't CNN talking about this? Oh that's right, the hurricane :|

Haley seemed like one of the potentially just two people in his whole administration with their head screwed on correctly.
 
CH: Axios broke the story a couple of days ago.

TLB: I'm not sure if it was the sheer velocity at which talent was flung from or by the White House, but we just started announcing these things here.

Mal: yes, I'm guessing Haley didn't want to be part of the mid-term stampede for the exits (although I've heard that the stampede is much larger than usual but no one really wants Trump staff), and it gives her a mo to shine.

But, there is an alleged "more to the story" circulating about... we'll see what floats.

I didn't know she had endorsed Rubio and Cruz before Trump.

Mostly, I believe NSA head John Bolton and CIA Director Secretary of State Mike Pompeo were sucking oxygen out of the air.

It will be interesting to find out.
 
Pulling this back to Trump, and the association to white supremacy and racism so many attribute to him:

8c86e1e58f0c6a61c265ffe04c80b5bd.jpg
 
wtf is this infantile idea that socialism = "free stuff"?

it almost seems like a distraction tactic to shift people's awareness away from the fact that trump promised a whole lot of shit he never intended to do (re-build american manufacturing to bring jobs back from china - among countless other things) and that instead of fighting for the little guys, he's dismantling their democracy and treating them with contempt with his lies, his abuse and his constant masturbatory self-congratulation.

there is nothing especially radical about suggesting that the immense wealth of the US government could be put to good use by putting it into initiatives that will benefit communities and individuals who are currently stuck in lifelong poverty and debt cycles.

intelligent leaders put money into education, health, infrastructure and various other areas that improve social welfare outcomes - because investing public money in the public makes good sense.

that's an especially poor tweet - especially the bit about "we can't allow the american dream to be crushed by you".

"the america dream" - isn't that the idea that if you work hard, you can prosper? the myth of class mobility?

i seem to recall trump's whole presidental spiel was about how this idea is at risk, under threat - and that millions of americans are working poor, because the vast majority are locked out of the prosperity that is enjoyed by a small minority.
upward social mobility is increasingly difficult in the contemporary world, especially in countries like the USA where education is prohibitively expensive to people without wealthy families.

this idea that a vacuous pampered rich bum like trump was going to be elected president and get in there to fight for average americans.
his political campaigns have been designed to appeal to people who lack the economic opportunities he was blessed with, but he never had any intention of fulfilling his promises to america's blue collar working poor - he conned them like he's conned people his entire life.

give me socialists over kleptocrats any time.
i would have thought that people who are opposed to taxation would be horrified at the way the president wastes public money, and abuses his position to line his own pockets - but it seems that ideological blinkers are really 'in' this season :\
 
that's an especially poor tweet - especially the bit about "we can't allow the american dream to be crushed by you".

"the america dream" - isn't that the idea that if you work hard, you can prosper? the myth of class mobility?
Apparently his American dream is working till death while Baron Trump never lifts a finger.
 
Yeah I also don't get where the idea that socialism = free stuff came from. Socialism = your tax dollars actually going towards things that benefit you. It's not free, everyone pays for it. We all pay for shit now with taxes, too, it's just that a lot of it doesn't benefit us in any way because it's being used to make the wealthy even wealthier, or towards wars we shouldn't be fighting.
 
^ indeed. I've always thought that we should make our governments spend our (collective) tax dollars on our communities, and our society.

While i am no supporter of "the state" as some megalith of control and surveillance, i do think that pooling our resources - and using them to build the sort of societies we want to live in - is the whole point.

The idea that "my tax dollars shouldn't pay for things to benefit you" seems really cynical and juvenile to me.
Tax dollars aren't "yours" or "mine" - they are, by definition "ours", and we should spend them in ways that benefit all of us, eapecially those who need it.

Rugged individualism is all well and good, if you want to drive around on unsealed roads, cart your own drinking water, dispose of your own sewage, put out the fire yourself if your house catches on fire, and defend your property from invaders if there did happen to be a military invasion.

Taxes pay for infrastructure like roads, clean drinking water, sewage, emergency services, military defence - all paid for by tax dollars.
Why draw an arbitrary line in the sand as to what we are - and are not - prepared to spend our taxes on?

Basically, tax is the price for living in society. Some folks might welcome a return to feudalism, but not i.
 
Socialism is when your tax dollars benefit others.

If you need to benefit yourself you can keep your own $

Hence why we have a poverty level

And why it needs to be raised - a lot

End the IRS - the trumps don’t pay their taxes but the poor do! The IRS and tax code is designed to punish people for making JUST ENOUGH $ TO GET BY. This is wrong and we’ve got to fix it.
 
Socialism is when your tax dollars benefit others.
It's a great deal more complicated than that, but i think "your tax dollars benefit society" is a better way of putting it.

Captain.Heroin said:
If you need to benefit yourself you can keep your own $

Hence why we have a poverty level

And why it needs to be raised - a lot

End the IRS - the trumps don?t pay their taxes but the poor do! The IRS and tax code is designed to punish people for making JUST ENOUGH $ TO GET BY. This is wrong and we?ve got to fix it.

That money was never your money though - that's just the fee the government charges for the privilege of getting to use their system, and use their capital as legal tender. Money is complicated - you don't think they just give us all the shiny coins and pretty bank notes for free, do you? Nope - the whole thing costs money, and that just comes straight out of what you earn, because it's capitalism: survival of the fittest, and the rules are not negotiable. Have a nice day! :)

Are you suggesting that poverty is caused by the IRS? If so, that doesn't make much sense to me.

Poverty is caused by lots of things, but stagnant wage growth, as well as a shortage of secure, liveable jobs available that allow people to support themselves without being forced to go into debt or juggle multiple shitty jobs just to survive. It is caused by underemployment and the unemployment that has gone along with automation and the shift of a lot of industries to countries where labour is cheap, and regulations (and taxes!) are fewer.
Poverty is not caused by taxes. i would argue that poverty - especially in your country - is worsened by the way tax dollars are spent, in regards to welfare and social programs which could help reducing the number of homeless and desperate people who fall through the cracks.

One of the reasons i'm in favour of unemployment benefits and the other elements of the welfare state are that people do get a tangible helping hand from the state if they find themselves unemployed or unable to work due to sickness or whatever.
Even if you never need to claim the dole yourself, pretty much everyone in australia - except some rich folks maybe - would have a good friend or loved one who has been a welfare recipient in one form or another.

It helps some people to survive, and is a literal lifeline to others.
It's paid for with taxes, and it's one of the reasons australia is a great place to live.
There is crime, but we don't have inner-city ghettos or slums. There are poor neighbourhoods, but they're in specific places, and there are homeless people, but i think there are estimated to be 2000 people in melbourne - which is the 2nd biggest city with about 5 million people. that's obviously too many people, but fewer than any of the major US cities. that's not a great comparison, but i'm just trying to illustrate how many fewer desperately poor down-and out people there are here than in the states.
and i point this out to highlight the connection between tax and poverty in our respective countries.

We pay higher income taxes than the US, i believe - so i really don't think taxes cause poverty.

look at it this way - if tax is causing financial hardship, it's not the fault of the tax - it's the fault of the pittance you are being paid in the first place.

your tax dollars could also be better spent investigating and prosecuting wage theft, which is poorly defended against in workforces that don't have effective unions.
 
That money was never your money though - that's just the fee the government charges for the privilege of getting to use their system

You're factually incorrect and you should know this as this would be called a flat tax; something libertarians often advocate for, but we do not have.

I don't know of any country with a flat tax that would be worthwhile to live in.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top