Study: Alcohol more harmful than heroin, cocaine

spini4

Bluelighter
Joined
Nov 18, 2003
Messages
795
LONDON — Alcohol is more dangerous than illegal drugs like heroin and crack cocaine, according to a new study.

British experts evaluated substances including alcohol, cocaine, heroin, ecstasy and marijuana, ranking them based on how destructive they are to the individual who takes them and to society as a whole.

Researchers analyzed how addictive a drug is and how it harms the human body, in addition to other criteria like environmental damage caused by the drug, its role in breaking up families and its economic costs, such as health care, social services, and prison.

Heroin, crack cocaine and metamfetamines, or crystal meth, were the most lethal to individuals. When considering their wider social effects, alcohol, heroin and crack cocaine were the deadliest. But overall, alcohol outranked all other substances, followed by heroin and crack cocaine. Marijuana, ecstasy and LSD scored far lower.

The study was paid for by Britain's Centre for Crime and Justice Studies and was published online Monday in the medical journal, Lancet.

Experts said alcohol scored so high because it is so widely used and has devastating consequences not only for drinkers but for those around them.

"Just think about what happens (with alcohol) at every football game," said Wim van den Brink, a professor of psychiatry and addiction at the University of Amsterdam. He was not linked to the study and co-authored a commentary in the Lancet.

When drunk in excess, alcohol damages nearly all organ systems. It is also connected to higher death rates and is involved in a greater percentage of crime than most other drugs, including heroin.

But experts said it would be impractical and incorrect to outlaw alcohol.

"We cannot return to the days of prohibition," said Leslie King, an adviser to the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and one of the study's authors. "Alcohol is too embedded in our culture and it won't go away."

King said countries should target problem drinkers, not the vast majority of people who indulge in a drink or two. He said governments should consider more education programs and raising the price of alcohol so it isn't as widely available.

continued at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39938438
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Heroin, crack cocaine and metamfetamines, or crystal meth, were the most lethal to individuals. When considering their wider social effects, alcohol, heroin and crack cocaine were the deadliest. But overall, alcohol outranked all other substances, followed by heroin and crack cocaine. Marijuana, ecstasy and LSD scored far lower.
what?
 
No surprises here.
The only strange part was at the end, when they discussed how it would be impractical to make alcohol illegal now.
I agree.
So....
(does the thought process stop there? If the most dangerous drug is legal, what about those that are less dangerous - should they remain illegal?)
 
The only strange part was at the end, when they discussed how it would be impractical to make alcohol illegal now.
I agree.
So....
(does the thought process stop there? If the most dangerous drug is legal, what about those that are less dangerous - should they remain illegal?)

It doesn't make much sense to justify making illegal drugs legal simply because the most dangerous drug of all is legal already. If anything, this study furthers the case that the public can not handle using legal intoxicants responsibly. But I don't believe that making drug use a crime is the right answer.
 
Drugs debate hots up

Mark Easton | 00:00 UK time, Monday, 1 November 2010

Today sees the publication of two pieces of scientific research that threaten to destabilise further the orthodoxy on drug policy in Britain.

One says our classification system of illicit substances is basically hopeless. The other says that decriminalising illicit drugs may be quite a good idea.

Tomorrow, of course, Californians vote on whether to legalise marijuana.

It is almost exactly a year since this blog revealed that Professor David Nutt had been sacked from his position as chair of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD) by the then Home Secretary Alan Johnson.

His dismissal, for allegedly "campaigning" against government drugs policy, prompted a show-down between scientists and ministers which saw a further seven council members resign.

A number of those experts went on to found their own Independent Scientific Committee on Drugs, operating, as they put it, "free from the constraints of policy-making and politics".

continued at
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/markeaston/2010/11/drugs_debate_hots_up.html
 
They say "methylamphetamine" in the BBC report. Do they not mean methamphetamine?
 
Heroin and crack are far more destructive than booze because they're illegal. Is this even addressed? The biggest danger of most illegal drugs is that they're illegal. They make men with guns appear. They make concrete and iron grow around innocent bodies.
 
Must say that I'm surprised Mephedrone, butane and buprenorphine got so good scores.


But it's all good news, can only hope more people realize that all drug laws are stupid.
 
I would imagine that for individuals who don't smoke or inject them, provided that there are no legal consequences and said individuals are able to afford their habits, heroin and cocaine are very significantly less dangerous than alcohol, and less physically damaging, overall, but to me this is just what makes sense, and is absolutely obvious, as it probably is to most posters here. I would imagine, however, that to the average citizen without a medical or scientific background, that this is absolutely shocking news.
 
It doesn't make much sense to justify making illegal drugs legal simply because the most dangerous drug of all is legal already. If anything, this study furthers the case that the public can not handle using legal intoxicants responsibly. But I don't believe that making drug use a crime is the right answer.

I disagree.
The government's reasoning behind making certain substances illegal is that they are too dangerous for the people to use safely.
If they insist on keeping alcohol - the most dangerous drug - legal, then where is the logic in making/keeping heroin etc. illegal?

We have already seen the dangers of alcohol use. So the study doesn't say that people can't handle alcohol as much as it says that people can handle other drugs.

To me, the study really says "Look, every other drug we studied is safer than that well-known, legal drug alcohol that you have probably used thousands of times in your life with few apparent harmful effects more than a hangover!"
 
Top