^Yeh I see what you mean about that website being compromsed, apologies. Below I will provide a seperate list.
Well, I've looked and failed to find evidence I would consider to be, even by its own admission, to have been conducted with full scientific rigor. If you can provide such evidence I'd be happy to look at it. But if I see failures to conduct the research properly I'm not going to pretend I don't see it.
That's perfectly fair. It's a complaint often levelled at parapsychology but is succefully agrued against on many occasions. PSI research has evolved to have extremely stringent methodologies due to that specific criticism.
I tried to find related stuff but didn't have much luck tracking down anything of note.
To begin with a list of useful books to get to know the science of the subject.
Outside the Gates of Science, by Damien Broderick
Randi’s Prize, by Robert McLuhan
The Evidence for Psi, Edited by Damien Broderick and Ben Goertzel
Basic Research in Parapsychology, by K. Ramakrishna Rao
The Varieties of Anomalous Experience, Edited by Etzel Cardena and Steven Jay Lynn
An article on the work Daryl Bem published in
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
http://hplusmagazine.com/2010/11/04...eleases-powerful-new-evidence-human-mind-can/
This is also an interesting article on Michael Persinger's work published in
neuroscience letters
http://www.dailygrail.com/blogs/Pau...ight-Taking-the-Psychology-Out-Parapsychology
Here is Dean Radin's website which contains a list of published, peer reviewed studies.
http://www.deanradin.com/evidence/evidence.htm
It certainly doesn't help that so many believers in such phenomenon most definitely don't believe it based on objective evidence and believe in various other claims many of which are DEFINITELY bullshit.
I agree, and there is so much bullshit in this field it's hard to know where legitimate research begins. Personal anecdotal evidence can be a strong factor, it's not that they want to believe, but based on genuine experience, invoking some form of PSI is the only intellectually honest avenue.
Of course there are frauds, hoaxers and people lacking rigour when evaluating their experience, but from my experience there is a real phenomena at play here, which is also supported by scientific literature.