• S E X
    L O V E +
    R E L A T I O N S H I P S


    ❤️ Welcome Guest! ❤️


    Posting Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • SLR Moderators: Senior Staff

So How Many Genders are There?

Androgynous is not a sex, it's a special look of somebody. Look at the skinny models, and especially into their skinny faces. Also very thin they are. When somebody says to me -" oh, she looks very androgynous" I think about a skinny female with a touch of a male look. I don't know if i'm right.

Here I found a very nice pic:

www.pinterest.de

Pin by Alper Sisters on Creative May 1st | Androgynous makeup, Androgynous, Androgynous models

Apr 30, 2015 - This Pin was discovered by Alper Sisters. Discover (and save!) your own Pins on Pinterest
www.pinterest.de www.pinterest.de
 
Last edited:
nuttynutskin said:
Apparently it's asexual. Had to look it up.
Click to expand...

Is it? That actually makes a lot more sense.

Although this brings me back to my original point. Why include asexual in a political grouping? Is there laws that would help asexuals if they were passed? Is there some kind of social recognition that's lacking that should be lobbied for?

I dunno, but I'd hope so cause otherwise what's the point of adding another letter that's just gonna be mocked?
 
Atelier3 said:
That’s how we can talk about the feminisation of Western culture. It does not mean that more feminine/female ‘people with penises’ are being born, just that they are growing up further down the spectrum than their forefathers likely were.

That’s also why discussing gender abstractly is less important than discussing how children and young adults are socialised. No competitive sports and no military service and a climate of intimacy and introspection is going to clump today’s generation way down the collaborative and cooperative feminine end of the spectrum. Which is why China and Russia will fuck us all six ways from Sunday eventually. They are still breeding for aggression and competition.
Click to expand...
West is nothing but a gynocentric shithole nowdays.
How can western men be so weak they allow women to take their children and 50% of their assets after a woman decides to cheat on her man and then wants a divorce?
The John Depp and Amber Reid situation is perfect about this.
False allegations of violence, Depp loses his role in PotC. They turn out to be false, no consequences for Reid. She admits she has done violence towards Depp, but Depp doesn't admit and there's no evidence - She even gets to keep her roles. Also, she got 7 million out of the divorce.
West is so weak.
Our media is praising transgender kids, no men wants to get married, nobody is having kids and woman can ruin your life with just one false allegation.
How did we get to this?
I'm glad Elon Musk just did the good ol' pump n dump to Amber Reid.
 
DeadManWalkin' said:
West is nothing but a gynocentric shithole nowdays.
How can western men be so weak they allow women to take their children and 50% of their assets after a woman decides to cheat on her man and then wants a divorce?
The John Depp and Amber Reid situation is perfect about this.
False allegations of violence, Depp loses his role in PotC. They turn out to be false, no consequences for Reid. She admits she has done violence towards Depp, but Depp doesn't admit and there's no evidence - She even gets to keep her roles. Also, she got 7 million out of the divorce.
West is so weak.
Our media is praising transgender kids, no men wants to get married, nobody is having kids and woman can ruin your life with just one false allegation.
How did we get to this?
I'm glad Elon Musk just did the good ol' pump n dump to Amber Reid.
Click to expand...

Lol, men don't "allow" women to take 50% of their assets. They are obligated to by law. And it works in reverse too. That's the price of marriage.

Suggesting they allow it sounds.. Well it sounds like something a violent sexist would say honestly. Cause what is it a man (and hopefully not you specifically) can do to prevent it? Other than intimidate the woman into not getting the courts to do it?

Well there is another option, you could also just avoid women entirely.
 
Last edited:
DeadManWalkin' said:
West is nothing but a gynocentric shithole nowdays.
How can western men be so weak they allow women to take their children and 50% of their assets after a woman decides to cheat on her man and then wants a divorce?
The John Depp and Amber Reid situation is perfect about this.
False allegations of violence, Depp loses his role in PotC. They turn out to be false, no consequences for Reid. She admits she has done violence towards Depp, but Depp doesn't admit and there's no evidence - She even gets to keep her roles. Also, she got 7 million out of the divorce.
West is so weak.
Our media is praising transgender kids, no men wants to get married, nobody is having kids and woman can ruin your life with just one false allegation.
How did we get to this?
I'm glad Elon Musk just did the good ol' pump n dump to Amber Reid.
Click to expand...

Are you a Trump-Voter if I may ask?

JJ
 
JoEhJoEh said:
Are you a Trump-Voter if I may ask?

JJ
Click to expand...
"Our media is praising transgender kids, no women wants to get married, nobody is having kids and men can ruin your life with just one false allegation."

WTF? That's too much, really.

JJ
 
JoEhJoEh said:
Are you a Trump-Voter if I may ask?

JJ
Click to expand...
"Our media is praising transgender kids, no women wants to get married, nobody is having kids and men can ruin your life with just one false allegation."

WTF? That's too much, really.

That's why I turn it around.
 
Okay. Done. This thread should be closed because WE ARE ALL HUMAN BEINGS DOESN'T DEPEND ON WHICH GENDER SOMEBODY HAS!

In my opinion there is nothing to discuss.

JJ
 
JoEhJoEh said:
Okay. Done. This thread should be closed because WE ARE ALL HUMAN BEINGS DOESN'T DEPEND ON WHICH GENDER SOMEBODY HAS!

In my opinion there is nothing to discuss.

JJ
Click to expand...
Ye but it can be discussed. If u don’t want to discuss then don’t.
Shouldn’t have to close the thread
 
JessFR said:
Lol, men don't "allow" women to take 50% of their assets. They are obligated to by law. And it works in reverse too. That's the price of marriage.

Suggesting they allow it sounds.. Well it sounds like something a violent sexist would say honestly. Cause what is it a man (and hopefully not you specifically) can do to prevent it? Other than intimidate the woman into not getting the courts to do it?

Well there is another option, you could also just avoid women entirely.
Click to expand...
"Something a violent sexist would say honestly"
Bwhahahah. Yeah, sure. Keep going on. "What can man do to prevent it?"
One man can't do pretty much anything, but men as a group can.
Think big.
Men are capable of even revolution, which I'm not advocating for tho. Men are capable of changing the society.
How come shit like this doesn't happen in Islamic countries? Because Islam isn't gynocentric religion and they follow the word of it.
Here tho.. Well shiieet..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
DeadManWalkin' said:
"Something a violent sexist would say honestly"
Bwhahahah. Yeah, sure. Keep going on. "What can man do to prevent it?"
One man can't do pretty much anything, but men as a group can.
Think big.
Men are capable of even revolution, which I'm not advocating for tho. Men are capable of changing the society.
How come shit like this doesn't happen in Islamic countries? Because Islam isn't gynocentric religion and they follow the word of it.
Here tho.. Well shiieet..
Click to expand...

Are you saying that we SHOULD be like Islamic contries?

Sure seems like "gynocentric" is code for "men don't exclusively get things to their advantage all the time anymore".
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top