• S E X
    L O V E +
    R E L A T I O N S H I P S


    ❤️ Welcome Guest! ❤️


    Posting Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • SLR Moderators: Senior Staff

So, do foreskins turn you off?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Very good point. It's rather surprising how emotional the men are about this discussion.

Why? I imagine there are a lot of people that are sensitive about elective irreversible procedures being done to them without their consent.
 
Very good point. It's rather surprising how emotional the men are about this discussion.

Mommies who are anti-circumcision are like that too.

I have had plenty of drunken, deep and pretty open conversations with men and I've never known one of them who were too concerned with their foreskin.
 
I get chewed out by mothers because I let my 10 and 6 yr old cross the road in front of my place and go play in the park by themselves. Mothers are a self righteous bunch of book fed know it alls. Life is unfair, every body will hate their parents for something unfair at least once in their lives so you may as well make it count. If that means my son dumps me in an old peoples home and feeds me cat food because I loped off his foreskin so be it. I'll just pray he gets his frenum caught in some 15 yr olds braces when he is putting the moves on when he is 14.
 
A dick is a tube of flesh... So is a vagina, or mouth, arguably, a person on the whole is a tube of flesh, people are roughly cylindrical, and have a canal going though them...
rangrz, sometimes i get all worked up, then i read your post and know the truth is already out there.

at all pro circumcision women, I guess then you ladies are all in favor of vaginal mutilation?

Female genital mutilation (FGM), also known as female genital cutting and female circumcision, is defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as "all procedures that involve partial or total removal of the external female genitalia, or other injury to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons."[1]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0NuCMKaRpY
 
Last edited:
I have taken a minute to think about it and I honestly just feel that it’s unfair towards women. Unfortunately they don’t get to experience the joys of circumcision(not talking about clitoral, just labia). Until circumcision for women is legal in the US I feel that I would be a hypocrite for supporting male circumcision.

Mark my words though, as soon as female circumcision is legal, my wife and I will be first in line for some snipsnip action. I am even going to preserve my foreskin in a little bottle.
 
They can still have their labia trimmed, it's called labiaplasty. Female circumcision culturally is performed to reduce sexual pleasure in women by removing all or part of the clitoris and is generally accepted as being performed from a position of male dominated power in societies that frown on female sexual enjoyment. No one can seriously argue that male circumcision is performed for the same reasons, and given the fact that a lot of women prefer a trimmed cock it could be argued that its is for the completely opposite reason. If we were to perform the same procedure like for like it would involve the removal of the entire glans or helmet.
 
They can still have their labia trimmed, it's called labiaplasty. Female circumcision culturally is performed to reduce sexual pleasure in women and is generally accepted as being performed from a position of male dominated power in societies that frown on female sexual enjoyment. No one can seriously argue that male circumcision is performed for the same reasons, and given the fact that a lot of women prefer a trimmed cock it could be argued that its is for the completely opposite reason.

That was my understanding too. I can state from experience of having had one at 30 that I personally found no change in sexual pleasure, however any unnecessary permanent operation that changes this for a female I find totally abhorrent.
 
They can still have their labia trimmed, it's called labiaplasty. Female circumcision culturally is performed to reduce sexual pleasure in women by removing all or part of the clitoris and is generally accepted as being performed from a position of male dominated power in societies that frown on female sexual enjoyment. No one can seriously argue that male circumcision is performed for the same reasons, and given the fact that a lot of women prefer a trimmed cock it could be argued that its is for the completely opposite reason. If we were to perform the same procedure like for like it would involve the removal of the entire glans or helmet.

I was talking about labia only, not doing it to reduce pleasure. I wasn't aware parents could bring their baby daughters to have their labia cut off for cosmetic reasons, now that I know that I can support circumcision. Now i must make good on my side of the bargain and will sign up for the snipsnip tonight.

Seriously though, i am going to ask my wife what she prefers tonight. I don't think that question has ever come up during our relationship. Best case scenario.. she likes it uncut. Worst case scenario, she has hated my cock all this time and makes me go through with it.
 
Last edited:
Good luck with that conversation brother.;) I'd rather tell her that her bum looks big in those jeans....

edit: I hope you don't mean talking about her large labia.
 
it is my understanding that circumcision in males has remained popular because it removes over thirty percent of the sexual nerve endings, has been claimed to reduce masturbation and certainly decreases pleasure and decreases a males ability to enjoy sex with a condom and because of this has enjoyed a long religious backing. really an all knowing being that supposedly created us, but intentionally left a pleasure rich portion there that needed to be takn off??? yeah a circumcised penis may look better to you but is crazy unnatural, i'm surprised that some of you think it looks or tastes gross as it has such similarity to a vagina, hmmm...
 
I'm a guy, American, and I'm cut and I'm happy w/ it and glad my mother had me circumsized so that I wouldn't be teased and I'm really glad she did. I'm cut and I'll have my sons cut, I don't feel like I need to explain my reasons here and please don't try to tell me I'm wrong just because you disagree.

god how could you cope if you had been teased, that would have been terrible. kind of reads like a patriotic head in the sand reason. you see i can understand why religious people do it because to be that religious is in my mind a form of mind control insanity and they've already lost it a bit, but secular people to adhere to an irrational tradition out of fear of teasing? i dont get it

Very good point. It's rather surprising how emotional the men are about this discussion.

dont pretend that wasn't the whole reason you started this negative body issue thread;). its all predicktable drama
 
circumcision is no different from murder,you just damage body of other people against their will,its done to babies so they cant resist.

How many American males over age 16 you know who decided on their own to cut their foreskin? tell me how much better it is

the whole hygiene issue is bullshit,I shower every single day and I pee with my foreskin rolled back,I didnt had dickcheese since I was 5 years old....

it is my understanding that circumcision in males has remained popular because it removes over thirty percent of the sexual nerve endings, has been claimed to reduce masturbation and certainly decreases pleasure and decreases a males ability to enjoy sex with a condom and because of this has enjoyed a long religious backing. really an all knowing being that supposedly created us, but intentionally left a pleasure rich portion there that needed to be takn off??? yeah a circumcised penis may look better to you but is crazy unnatural, i'm surprised that some of you think it looks or tastes gross as it has such similarity to a vagina, hmmm...

I had it done through necessity when I was 30 and can categorically state that sex before and after has not changed and feels just as good, not that I'm promoting the practice but the concept that it destroy's sexual desire or the need to masturbate etc in my experience is totally and utterly incorrect and unlike the vast majority of males, I've had sex before and after a circumcision so am speaking with personal experience. Also to DOB I don't agree that rape is not permanent, the damage is psychological and I know women who have been and it stays with them for ever.
 
There is no snipping anymore. They cauterize the Peter Pan whistle. Back in the 70's when cauterization was first introduced as a means of circumcision, a young twin Canadian boy by the name of David Reimer suffered from a case of phimosis - him and his twin brother. They were taken in for circumcision. David went first. It was botched. The doctor inadvertantly burned the poor boy's ENTIRE phallus off with the lazer. It was described as resembling a piece of burnt string dangling between his legs.

David's parents consulted with a popular psychologist and sexologist named Dr. John Money who met with the family and performed a drastic experiemt. he said that David was young enough to undergo a complete sex and gender reassignment. He was a proponent of the nurture over nature argument. The boys name was changed to Brenda and he was raised as a girl, even being given hormones to grow breasts at puberty. His ballsack was also removed.

Life was hell for young Brenda (David). Something was not right. He was depressed and did not feel like a girl. He was teased and ridiculed and called awful names by his peers and classmates like "it" and "caveman". The family would consult with John Money once a year and brenda was never to know the secret about her (his) identity. As years went on, it became increasingly clear that this whole experiemt was not working. Inside, David hated John Money and did not identify or look like a girl. He became angry and refused when John Money insisted that he undergo surgery to create a makeshift vagina.

His parent's finally laid the truth down on him in his early teens. He was shocked, yet surprisingly over-joyed, as he finally had answers to why he identified so much as a male his entire life. He started dressing and behaving as a boy from this point on. Later on he would be equipped with a fake phallus and have his bosoms chopped off. In his mid-to-late teens he began over-eating, intentionally trying to gain weight to cover up the breasts that he had grown as a result of the diobolical Dr. John Money's hormone treatments.

Later in life, he married a woman with 3 kids and rasied them as his own. He continued to take his male hormones and was startlingly attractive. But David had a dark side. He was a tomented soul who was a victim of circumstances that your average boy could only imagine in his worst nightmares. As much as things seemed fine for David and his family on the surface, he was haunted by the gruesome reality of his past and his accidentally caused sexual ambiguity.

Well. my friends at the DV... one morning, years ago, after getting into a serious argument with his wife, David, now in his late thirties, had had enough of life. Up until that point he still sporadically complained of his sexual inadequacies. Overwhelmed by emotional demons, David travelled to his backyard shed when the house was empty of his wife and kids. he retreived his shotgun and promptly sawed off the barrel. Next, he drove to a nearby grocery store parking lot, rolled up the windows, placed the barrel of the shotgun between his lips and gripped it with his teeth. he gave one last exhale, closed his eyes and pulled the trigger. Blood-red painted the entire interior of the car.

And that my friends, is the horrific and tragic story of David Reimer: the boy who was raised as a girl due to an unfortunate botched circumcision.
 
dont pretend that wasn't the whole reason you started this negative body issue thread;). its all predicktable drama

Actually, I started it because I'd been thinking about a one off with a foreskin...a really horrid foreskin.

Don't presume that you're aware of my motives, darling. ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top