• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Shambles

Russell Brand... your thoughts?

A read recently about another woman he silenced with an injunction and then forced his £40K legal costs onto her, which bankrupted her.

A very unpleasant man.
 
Even Jemimah Goldsmith has said she had to call the cops to hoy him out the house when he was being violent in 2014. She said "I have not spoken to the lairy cunt since"
 
Wow, I admit, that IS more than I expected.

Back to HMP Wandsworth (which at least I did correctly predict).

I noted how RB tried to maintain a faux faux Cockney hardman image OUTSIDE the court but apparently utterly switched to being ever so contrite INSIDE the court room. I noted RB doesn't seem to understand the 'permenance of objects' and I would be amazed if the judge hadn't monitored Brand's actions during the trial to see if that contrition was real - which we all know it wasn't.

Now RB WILL have to pay either his current legal team or a new team as an appeal has to be lodged within 28 days.

Now for people outside the UK - an appeal could potentially take YEARS to reach court and if it fails, the entire time spent in prison while appealing his sentence/guilt can be considered 'loss of time' i.e. the time spent appealing would not be considered part of his sentence. It's discretionary but if the judge sees 'no merit' i.e. it's merely a last ditch attempt then it WILL be treated as loss of time.

There are two more allegations of rape which RB has been interviewed in relation to, one being a 16 year old girl.

A second conviction would add a decade or more and I would be surprised if under questioning, RB hasn't done exactly the same as in the interviews that have been made public i.e. read from a carefully composed statement and refuse to answer any additional questions. Basically claiming not to recall anything.

So I suppose in the next 28 days we will have some idea of how RB is thinking. If that second tranche of complaints DOES reach court before any appeal, even guilt on one count would result in a much longer sentence and make any appeal essentially pointless UNLESS all three guilty verdicts are reversed.

He has already been classed as a VP so will spend his time in seg which is typically locked up 21 hours a day. As Tommy-Ten-Names proved, it's still possible to gain earned privilages. A few prisons have VP wings, but not many and not enough and with rule 45, it's first come, first served.

I should add that there are four HMPs whose inmates are ALL sex offenders but all of them are catagory C and I suggest RB would have to do most of his time before being put into a cat C.

Frankly, IF either of those other complaints make it to trial, I wouldn't be at all surprised if RB ended himself.
 
hear he is not doing well in there already -- much like diddy there are things money buys and things it doesn't and respect in prison with a sex crime is iffy. The diddy Christopher Dudus Coke(sp) thing is great and hopefully ya'll got some hardasses in Wandsworth (if i didnt get that right lmk - the prison name that is)
 
@CfZrx - you are complaining about a post made over THREE years ago?

Are you certain you haven't posted anything that years later don't seem equally badly informed? Like using the appeal to anecdote logical fallacy again and again and again and again... just as a totally random example.

[IGNORE]
How was i complaining? Just asked a direct, friendly question.
 
I noticed the judge coating him off for lying and denying the charges - but he did get off with 4 of the charges.

if he'd been "honest" and just pleaded guilty to it all he would have got twice as long
 
I read on social media that his defense barrister said that he did the rape. He essentially stated that following consensual vaginal intercourse, that for a short time, Brand lost control, and anally raped the woman.

If this is true, then it raises all sorts of questions?

Brand has no chance of appealling the verdict if even his defense has said he's guilty?

Surely defense should be in sync with their client or vice versa?

Does a defence legally have to declare the truth, as they deem it, and is it a criminal offense for them not to do so?

This was the 3rd time that woman had met brand, the first time she'd orally pleasured him. Then she was involved in a threesome with another woman, and she licked his anus. She came back for more a 3rd time!

To play Devil's advocate, Brand might be forgiven (to some extent) for thinking she was a slut with NO boundaries? Hence he marked "T" against her name on his phone, denoting "Tart."
 
Last edited:
I noticed the judge coating him off for lying and denying the charges - but he did get off with 4 of the charges.

if he'd been "honest" and just pleaded guilty to it all he would have got twice as long
Maybe half of the charges were false?

It's weird that the jury only found him guilty of half of the charges.
 
Top