Lolol. And the guy who blew his car up outside of a Trump Hotel was a Trump supporter. Have Trump name a school after him. One by one Trump's precious pardons are getting themselves sent back for being scum.
Hey, this whole thread is about Russel Brand; at some point it got lost because someone brought up something about Trump.
I get off Track easily. But what I was trying to say early on was that suddenly decades after an 'alleged sexual misconduct/ rape by different women 2 decads and one in 1999, seems ridiculous and there are even in England statutes of limitations and someone; probably that stalker Alastair brought up that I was sticking up for Russel Because he switched to being a conservative or whatever. That is nonsense, I was standing up for a principle of there are statutes of limitations and charging guys decades after a supposed crime, other than murder, is absurd. Just like if the government found out 26 years ago you were involved in illegal drug transactions or beat someone up. Actually you would have probably have been the one getting beat up. Cowards and wimps always like to join in on an attack on me after others have gone the absurd route.
This is nonsense and off topic because people went there and I can't stand Russel Brand.
Besides just look at all the lefties and there hysterical lies and meltdowns. But this was about time limits and suspicions about the UK police doing this in light of all the perverts who got away with horrible sex crimes in the past and they got political, and Alastair can't get over that I stood up and said this is ridiculous that a woman can claim something and on her word that a guy did something " allegedly" and arrest him 26 years later.
Get off your hysterical low horse and remember this about what should be done about " Russel Brand" I am not sure I can say what they ought to do. Let's just I don't like and have no respect for him.
However the notion of a woman just being able to accuse a guy decades later is absurd and so is the notion of me sticking up for Russel because of his supposed switch in political beliefs. He is a creep and that has not changed. That creepy vegan, health and wellness wannabe guru should not have even been allowed in this country and you can cherry pick what ever nonsense but you obviously have no ability to debate. Like all lefties you want to change the subject.
DO YOU EVEN HAVE THE ABILITY TO DEBATE OR ARE YOU INCAPABLE OF ANY RATIONAL ARGUEMENTS? IS THAT ALL YOU CAN COME UP WITH, IS TOO JOIN AND ATTACK BASED ON POLITICS?
I GUESS YOU ARE UNABLE TO FORM ANY SORT RESPONSE WITH ANY SUBSTANCE?
LET'S SEE WHAT THAT BRAIN OF YOURS IS CAPABLE OF. COME UP WITH A ARGUEMENT ON THE REAL TOPIC.
I TOUGHT SO, YOU CAN'T. ALL YOU CAN DO IS JUMP IN AND ADD MORE NONSENSE TO A ARGUEMENT THAT WAS RUN OFF COURSE BY OTHERS WHO COULD NOT DEBATE. I AM SORRY YOU ARE UNABLE TO COME UP WITH ANY CIVILIZED AND RATIONAL ARGUEMENTS. ON WHETHER THERE SHOULD BE THE ABILITY FOR WOMEN TO MAKE CLAIMS DECADES LATER WITH NO PROOF. I BET IF RUSSEL WASN'T RICH THIS WOULDN'T BE HAPPENING. BUT HIM BEING AGAINST THE LEFT NOW PROBABLY DOES FACTOR INTO IT. BUT IF YOU WANT TO TRY TO ARGUE THAT, PLEASE DO. I NEED A LAUGH. BUT YOU WILL NOT PRESENT ANY SORT OF ARGUMENT BECAUSE YOU LACK THAT CAPACITY. PROVE ME WRONG. OR WILL YOU JUST PREDITABLE JUST SPOUT OFF SOME MORE NONSENSE? YOU ARE JUST LIKE THEM ALL. NO CLUE, JUST NONSENSE. PROVE ME WRONG. NO, I NEED A LAUGH, JUST MORE BS. I ACTUALLY FIND IT AMUSING SEEING THE PATHETICNESS OF THOSE WHO TRY TO DEBATE ME. NO CAN EVER SEEM TO DO DEBATE AGAINST ME.
IT IS ALWAYS BS.
PS, I AM NOT YELLING. I AM MAKING THE WORDS BIG, SO YOU CAN HOPEFULLY, FULLY UNDERSTAND WHAT I AM TRYING TO SAY. WHAT IS YOUR ARGUEMENT, FOR ALLOWING WOMEN TO MAKE ALLRGATIONS DECADES AFTER AN ALLEGED (SEXUAL ASSUALT AND OR LEWD ACTS, THERE WAS A FEW ALLEGATIONS) CAN THE SYSTEM ALLOW A MAN OR WHATEVER RUSSEL IS BE DESTROYED BY SOME WOMAN OR WOMEN DECADES LATER AND DOES HIS MONEY AND MAYBE EVEN POLITICAL CHANGE FACTOR IN TO THIS. I THREW IN THE LAST PART JUST SO YOU WOULD HAVE SOMETHING TO LIE ABOUT. TRUTH YOU WOULDN'T KNOW IT IF HIT YOU UPSIDE YOUR HEAD. I AM BEING NICE. LET'S SEE YOU ARGUE AND PUT FORTH A RATIONAL REASON WHY OR WHY NOT TO THE ORIGINAL ARGUEMENT. LOL, I THOUGHT SO.
PLEASE CHANGE THE SUBJECT, I KNOW YOU WILL.
OFF COURSE YOU CAN'T.
