adder
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2006
- Messages
- 2,851
I've never actually argued with you about that fact. But here is another thing you brought up. Bayer had been looking for a painkiller less addictive than morphine. Heroin was synthesized. It was very widespread almost as a panacea. It took them over a decade to withdraw heroin from the market. I don't think anyone knew at that time heroin synthesized from morphine is actually metabolized by human body to the parent drug.
It's not all about my opinion. It's more about the perspective because here there is no debate, there are no many theories. But you can't simply put an equation mark between heroin and morphine because heroin even being a pro-drug for morphine has different pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Also, morphine injected (which I always preferred so maybe I should stand by your simplification) and morphine as a metabolite of heroin bring a bit different effects. If it all was like you put it out, there should be no difference in medicine between giving someone heroin or morphine for pain, they're equally good for pain management. I must say that heroin has been stigmatized and that's one of the reasons why it's not marketed for pain. And once again the US lies to us by stating in the CSA that for heroin "there is a lack of accepted safety for use of the drug or other substance under medical supervision". But then again is there really a need for a drug so similar to morphine that choosing between those two would probably be dependent on physicians' mood.
It's not all about my opinion. It's more about the perspective because here there is no debate, there are no many theories. But you can't simply put an equation mark between heroin and morphine because heroin even being a pro-drug for morphine has different pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Also, morphine injected (which I always preferred so maybe I should stand by your simplification) and morphine as a metabolite of heroin bring a bit different effects. If it all was like you put it out, there should be no difference in medicine between giving someone heroin or morphine for pain, they're equally good for pain management. I must say that heroin has been stigmatized and that's one of the reasons why it's not marketed for pain. And once again the US lies to us by stating in the CSA that for heroin "there is a lack of accepted safety for use of the drug or other substance under medical supervision". But then again is there really a need for a drug so similar to morphine that choosing between those two would probably be dependent on physicians' mood.
