aanallein
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2006
- Messages
- 6,205
Depends entirely on the league.
Not to mention the fact that every sport conceivable is currently having a problem with drugs. People are using performance enhancing supplements in EVERY sport.
Oh and "juicing" is really becoming a problem that there will be no containing. Technology is simply advancing way too fast. Where is the line drawn on juicing? Obviously anabolic substances are banned. Most stimulants are banned. A lot of diuretics are banned. HGH is untestable. Many MANY peptides are now being released which cause an increase in recovery capacity, strength, endurance. All of these are so new as to be completely untestable. Myostatin inhibitors are going to be next if they aren't out there already. Red blood cell boosters are banned but yet training at high elevation or in oxygen deprivation to achieve the same results is not. How far away is genetic modification/engineering? We already have the science on hand to prevent growth plates from fusing so we can get freakishly tall people at will.
Really we are on an incredibly slippery slope here. At least 90% of competitive sports are seeing competitors using some kind of either blatantly illegal/banned substances to gain an edge or using every conceivable alternative. When you have athletes jumping from substance to substance simply to stay ahead of the bans but putting their health at an even greater risk because they are basically becoming guinea pigs for these compounds.. who are we really saving here by banning anything? And where will it even end? Eventually it will be too costly (it already is for most leagues) to test for all the available banned substances. What then? Polygraphs? Those are flawed and unreliable. And how do you test for genetic engineering? How do you prove somebody's genetics have been tampered with? Isn't the fact that one person is born with the genetics for more fast twitch muscles than another person an unfair advantage now that we see that those genetics are modifiable?
Not to mention the fact that every sport conceivable is currently having a problem with drugs. People are using performance enhancing supplements in EVERY sport.
Oh and "juicing" is really becoming a problem that there will be no containing. Technology is simply advancing way too fast. Where is the line drawn on juicing? Obviously anabolic substances are banned. Most stimulants are banned. A lot of diuretics are banned. HGH is untestable. Many MANY peptides are now being released which cause an increase in recovery capacity, strength, endurance. All of these are so new as to be completely untestable. Myostatin inhibitors are going to be next if they aren't out there already. Red blood cell boosters are banned but yet training at high elevation or in oxygen deprivation to achieve the same results is not. How far away is genetic modification/engineering? We already have the science on hand to prevent growth plates from fusing so we can get freakishly tall people at will.
Really we are on an incredibly slippery slope here. At least 90% of competitive sports are seeing competitors using some kind of either blatantly illegal/banned substances to gain an edge or using every conceivable alternative. When you have athletes jumping from substance to substance simply to stay ahead of the bans but putting their health at an even greater risk because they are basically becoming guinea pigs for these compounds.. who are we really saving here by banning anything? And where will it even end? Eventually it will be too costly (it already is for most leagues) to test for all the available banned substances. What then? Polygraphs? Those are flawed and unreliable. And how do you test for genetic engineering? How do you prove somebody's genetics have been tampered with? Isn't the fact that one person is born with the genetics for more fast twitch muscles than another person an unfair advantage now that we see that those genetics are modifiable?
Last edited: