• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion

    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Pissed_and_messed | Shinji Ikari

Official Paedo Discussion Megathread v2

Shambles said:
Ya. I probably should've made that more clear originally. There's plenty very malecentric rape fantasy pr0n vids online which I find very distrubing cos they're so much closer to actual rape. Am not into censorship of any kind but I'm not sure that kinda stuff being made - and made so brutal and explicit - is so wise. The type of men who make/view such things are not the kinda men I'd want to know :|
Click to expand...

I agree, everything comes from the female in life.
I like my bizarre porn (dwarfs used as dildos, brutal anal etc) but draw the line at that stuff.

Sadly I came across a Japanese "Ruka" film once, I will never forget it :(
I find it a total lack of respect to the feminine aspect of life.
 
black_paw said:
Sadly I came across a Japanese "Ruka" film once, I will never forget it :(
I find it a total lack of respect to the feminine aspect of life.
Click to expand...

I have never heard of such films. Google doesn't help either. But am guessing this is probably for the best :|

Japanese pr0n can be pretty fukkin brutal. Very iffy in places. I tend to put it down to cultural differences as they seem to get on fine with it. Even I would struggle to wank over cockroach pr0n and the like though 8o
 
mahoosive bendah said:
it is non peado for a child to fantasise about a child.
it is peado for an adult to fantasise about a child.
really couldnt be simpler
Click to expand...

Bit more subtle than that mahoosive, If you fantasised about someone when you were 14, and you still fantasise about them now you're an adult - but you havn't seen them since you were 14, does THAT make you a paedo?
 
I see where you're coming from Ismene and it's interesting, so I'll bite.

Is there not a difference between paedophilia and criminal paedophilia? The situation you describe is presumably wanking over a mental image of a 14 year old. That may be paedophilia (once you are over 16 or 18, whatever the age is) but its not criminal because we don't have thought police yet.

If you acted on the (a) 14 year old physically, for real, that's criminal. If you used a physical image, photo, video etc, that's criminal, because it's denying consent (because a minor cannot give consent). But thought cannot be criminal, though still may be paedophilia.
 
Loosely speaking, paedophilia is the sexual attraction towards kids. It's not illegal. It is simply a condition where an adult is sexually aroused by children or images of them. It's sometimes characterised as a mental illness or personality disorder.

Actually interfering with kids is child abuse. That's a crime.

No, we don't quite have thought police yet, at least not official state-sponsored thought police. Plenty of them in the street though.
 
knock said:
It's sometimes characterised as a mental illness or personality disorder.
Click to expand...

What makes someone rape a child?

Excellent article about how paedophilia is dealt with in India. Amazingly progressive attitudes compared to the standard "String the bastards up by their balls" stuff we get over here.

... I am not saying that every rapist has been raped. But what I can is that everyone who gets into the space of sexual violence has probably had a history of violence somewhere or the other where he has either witnessed someone close to him becoming a prey or has been a prey himself or herself. It's not just man versus woman. If you look at the history of boys who run away, who I have worked with, all of them have had some violence at home and many of them from their mothers. And the mothers have their share of violence from their fathers, from husbands. So it sort of transmits itself. So the nature of power is or the nature of violence is transmitive. And I think it's difficult to pinpoint as to is it a person who is perverted or is it a structure that is perverted? And I think both men and women are prey to patriarchy that the perverted structure brings about...
Click to expand...
 
StoneHappyMonday said:
I see where you're coming from Ismene and it's interesting, so I'll bite.

Is there not a difference between paedophilia and criminal paedophilia? The situation you describe is presumably wanking over a mental image of a 14 year old. That may be paedophilia (once you are over 16 or 18, whatever the age is) but its not criminal because we don't have thought police yet.

If you acted on the (a) 14 year old physically, for real, that's criminal. If you used a physical image, photo, video etc, that's criminal, because it's denying consent (because a minor cannot give consent). But thought cannot be criminal, though still may be paedophilia.
Click to expand...

Good thinking shm. It's just something that piques my curiosity. Seeing as everyone has pretty strong fantasies at the age of 14 about other people of 14 and those fantasies can persist into adulthood, I just wondered where that put you on the paedo scale. You arn't interested in 14 year old girls NOW, but you still jerk the gherkin over a 14 year old you knew when you were 14.
 
Don't think I've ever wanked over my schoolboy crushes since I left my schoolboy days far behind. I did have a major crush on one girl in particular. She was 12/13 last time I saw her - only just beginning to develop. I'd feel kinda wrong tugging one out given that fact.
 
Like say Ismene, it struck a chord and I do know where you're coming from. I certainly remember (as much as I'm prepared to admit anyway) wanking over (mental images of) my school mates (female) when at least 17/18 so it does pose an interesting question about cut off points etc...
 
No no no no no. Your rumour is wrong. However, Ronnie Barker's son is a convicted paedophile, true story. Google it.
 
Actually I heard a rumour about Barker too, but it was just a rumour. In this climate and these circumstances it's at least possible that the rumour is that he's not a paedo.
 
I also heard the Ronnie Barker rumour a while back. Say it ain't so :(

StoneHappyMonday said:
So who isn't a child rapist on Coronation Street then?
Click to expand...

Presumably not the ones who got a job on Eastenders instead... oh... hang on...

I think the more valid question is "Does anybody who has ever worked on any television show at any time past, present or future not a child rapist?".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top