When studying science they get you to cure any religious beliefs, and hence become unbalanced.
Welcome to bluelight and you'd better get used to this kind of treatment.
Just to jump in here, a common argument I hear on this forum for the existence of god is to appeal to the apparent existence of mystical, abstract concepts like: love, imagination, consciousness, memory and emotion......and at first glance it's a great argument right?
To you I would point out this, we are only at the beginning of our enlightenment and we may very well soon derive the mechanistic and physical processes that bring rise to these phenomena.
Drugs bring us closer to answers in regards to these things.......
Just think:
ecstasy and oxytocin induce love states
general anesthetics short circuit and negate consciousness, LSD heightens consciousness
"smart" drugs improve memory and electroshock therapy disrupts memories
LSD heightens imagination - some of the world's greatest artists had their imagination driven by drugs (Dali).
antidepressants and mood stabilisers can control emotions
You see all of these supposed mystical concepts react to physical chemicals in a predictable manner. Does it not follow then that these concepts are themselves rooted somewhere in the physical sciences? We just need to look harder and the answers will become clear. Religion's answers to these questions stop intellectual debate and progression of the sciences. When in reality truth is stranger than the fictional reality religion provides.
Done worse to you, ONLY because you do it to others first, and you are relentless at it!
You just said it>STRANGERS<unfortunately that is your problem here, you can attack strangers' and their ideas since you do and you will consider them STRANGERS-not people you come to interact and hence get to know and respect no matter what! Why come to berade strangers, if you have friends, go converse with them?
You enjoy being argumentative and adversarial-so you find pleasure in coming here to do this, but I also believe since you deny your right and philosophical side, you are an extremely lonely individual and come here to rub some sensitivity from others, and in the attempt-try to kill it in the others. One only appreciates ideas coming from the feminine side of the brain-if they can relate to it-which is of their sensitivity-if they have it and draw upon it.
Hmmm, every time you come to reintroduce your criticisms of other's ideas, some one you rely upon for support comes first for you to feel supported. beamers???
Perhaps the way you come here attacking as if nothing else besides science exists
Especially since I received a warning and constant lectures from MyDoorsAreOpen, yet he has remained silent when people who agree with his viewpoints do the same thing. I just think it shows a lack of integrity on the mods part.
i believe in a semiconscious divine that controls the universe. it's in all of us. it's nature. we are divine manifest.
enlitx said:I just can't stand the hypocrisy of everyone whining about their beliefs being disrespected only to turn around and do worse to me. Especially since I received a warning and constant lectures from MyDoorsAreOpen, yet he has remained silent when people who agree with his viewpoints do the same thing. I just think it shows a lack of integrity on the mods part.
Well prove him wrong, if it exists then it is scientific by definition
On the topic of "fighting", if you can't explain your beliefs etc... then you have no place expressing them in a public forum, expect to defend your beliefs. I can and do.
You might as well just say, god is everywhere and no where at the same time.
^^^Hey perfectly said again! I missed that last one all together it flew away from my attention-INDEED! I could not have said it any better!!Cry me a river. No one else here is treating you with anywhere near as much disrespect as you constantly have shown others. If you don't like how the majority here discuss things, then you know where the door is.
Your crusade is as pathetic as that idiot Richard Dawkins'. Sure he's brilliant in his field and i have enjoyed his books on evolution, but as soon as he overstepped his bounds and started talking about religion, he has really displayed his complete lack of understanding on the matter.
Stick to what you know. Neither of you have any idea on the matter being discussed in this thread. The schizophrenic analogy you spurt doesn't fly as that is a very different situation.
This statement is absurd or your definitions are wrong/incomplete.
Not all things are explainable.
Indeed. This statement can make more sense than you can realise right now with those blinkers on.
beamers said:That's quite a vacuous statement. You might as well just say, god is everywhere and no where at the same time.