Well, I imagine that there are a variety of responses to the rape-in-heaven problem. Obviously it depends on a conception of Heaven where people have physical bodies, not just souls; that's not that common a view. It also depends on personal identity (some people believe that your soul goes to heaven, but that your consciousness and thus your identity cease at death), as a moral agent.
You might argue that the only people who go to Heaven just wouldn't rape someone; they are holistically and habitually good. Therefore, it would just be impossible for rapes to happen in heaven even if they were bad.
I can see people arguing that you don't make decisions in Heaven; you just passively experience God's glory, eternal bliss and happiness (if that was my existence I know I wouldn't bother trying to do stuff). Depending on your conception of Heaven, you might not be a distinct individual in any way; Eastern religions tend to conceive of becoming an undifferentiated part of the Godhead, and the whole thing is just one entity. I don't know, I'm not a Christian, and I imagine that there might be almost as many thoughts on the problem as there are Christians.
You might argue that the only people who go to Heaven just wouldn't rape someone; they are holistically and habitually good. Therefore, it would just be impossible for rapes to happen in heaven even if they were bad.
I can see people arguing that you don't make decisions in Heaven; you just passively experience God's glory, eternal bliss and happiness (if that was my existence I know I wouldn't bother trying to do stuff). Depending on your conception of Heaven, you might not be a distinct individual in any way; Eastern religions tend to conceive of becoming an undifferentiated part of the Godhead, and the whole thing is just one entity. I don't know, I'm not a Christian, and I imagine that there might be almost as many thoughts on the problem as there are Christians.
I totally agree. It's always seemed very odd to me the way people perceive that there's a choice between religions, and that one of them is right; people should think independently and come to their own conclusions. To be honest, I think that following one organised religion is to shirk your epistemic responsibility.all im saying is I'd rather that if there is a god/being or whatever, id like to discover it/him/her in my own way, not being TOLD by someone who doesnt know shit.

