LSD Info Request: What's going around - Part Trois

[Fieldy]

i'm sorry but i do have to laugh at nanobrain for ball sizing as some may say but some people have quality and some people don't. As for proof for his claims we will never know. I've never done acid and not got the balls to yet so i cant put much input into this discussion, although its a fairly interesting read.

 

[Mr Blonde]

I've never done acid and not got the balls to yet so i cant put much input into this discussion, although its a fairly interesting read.

Just cause I'm curious; what is it in particular about the LSD experience that you don't have the balls for yet?

Not trying to pick on you or anything, just wanting to see someone else's perspective of the drug.

 

[nanobrain]

this thread is in re whats going around in Aus LSD-wise?

sorry if not so.

anyhoo..older than most of' y'alls and do have access to a GCMS...can quote more than a single White Rastas decade old breakdown from the Fungus place, met those making the best LSD (in a dream not long ago), am not a dealer of drugs or sizer of roosters. i claim nothing.

around VIC:

new purple liq. and: Orange Sunshine (not ALD52), Royal Doof Fairies, Indonesians, Polynesians, white spiderwebs.

and, for the record, i have nothing to d with any aspect of LSD economics, i am merely an observer and a reporter of info. as we all know LSD and DMT should be free(d) - casting your insecurities in the mix helps not the morphogenics.

 

[TechKnow]

If you have access to a GC/MS machine, can we get an analysis of one of your tabs then?

 

[nanobrain]

sorry bra, burden of proof is on the Inquisition, as you'll learn, those who know me ask not such preschooler questions long.

the orbs were saturated in a precisely calibrated solution of precisely diluted crystal (ya ever seen crystal piezzoluminesce?) for a total of 5 times, let dry before each dip. thus the likely per tab content is closer to 500 mikes. suffice to say it is not a mass market effort but a celebration of the laws of physics and the spirit of Man, moreover of a specific man who left us recently.

vic: YODA blots, 'i aint nevah seen me sheets dat big' was heard, sorry no pic

 

[8ft-Sativa]

Until then, your credibility is basically nil in my book, sorry.

So true

 

[marklar_the_23rd]

the orbs were saturated in a precisely calibrated solution of precisely diluted crystal (ya ever seen crystal piezzoluminesce?) for a total of 5 times, let dry before each dip.

erm, i thought double dipping is a myth...

and your description doesnt make much sense. if the cardboard is saturated then it cant possibly hold any more than the first "dip" ?? unless the second dip displaces the first dip, but still, the dose impregnated into the cardboard being "saturated" means no matter what the amount of LSD in there will not change from dip to dip.

ps proof of burden is on the person making the claims, not the people questioning it.

 

[Flinch]

Well, Nanobrain could be a very well connected bloke who is willing to take the risk to share information with us about whats going around, or some kid trying to look well connected etc.

I choose not to point the finger, and take his information in like i do all the information from these boards, with caution, yet thankful of it.

Now, lets stop this nit picking and leave this thread just about whats going around, if your going to argue about reliability etc, then i think most people already know how reliable information is on the internet, and if you really must insist, take it to another thread =)

Nothing new in terms of sydneys squares, red ohms still good tho =)

 

[TechKnow]

No person involved in LSD production/distribution would post in detail on an ecstasy forum. Simple as that.

Im over it, but misinformation that bad has to be pointed out.

 

[[eK]]

ive been able to get access to these damn 'JFK' tabs in syd for quite some time now.
im real suss on them.
they will probably be shit.
somebody has to have some information for me??!

 

[nanobrain]

i do not feed trolls, nor as you may have noted, defend any information i provided. i have to prove nothing even to this esteemed audience, just thought in error perhaps the info may be of use to yous'

i shall not 'disinform' the quality of this topic further. thus, first pic is a rarity eh? second must be some trash leftovers in someones bin, as it couldnt possibly be acid, the third - what i really think of the feeble attempts at 'LSD' knowledge shown by certain posters above.

happy trails.

LEOs reading this fiction know it to be just so - a penile-projectin, sackflexin fantasy, just making sure

 

[TechKnow]

You weren't the only one to get that Da Vinci sheet .

Anyway, moving right along.

 

[Fieldy]

Just cause I'm curious; what is it in particular about the LSD experience that you don't have the balls for yet?

Not trying to pick on you or anything, just wanting to see someone else's perspective of the drug.

well ive always been curious and like reading trip reports about the stuff but i believe i am not ready to experience anything to hectic/out of this world, im very comfortable with my life and how its going and I will wait until the right time to try it, mind you im quite fried on some pink planes at the moment so don't mind the babble the whole 12 hours of tripping seems hectic though in my opinion. Anyway 1 day i will venture down the rabbit hole.

 

[peaked]

Don't listen to the naysayers nanobrain. Your LSD reports are some of the best on here and it'd be a shame to see them stop. I tend to think some are just jealous of the quality you tease us with, when most can only obtain product where consuming 5 tabs results in "minor visuals".

 

[marklar_the_23rd]

Don't listen to the naysayers nanobrain. Your LSD reports are some of the best on here and it'd be a shame to see them stop. I tend to think some are just jealous of the quality you tease us with, when most can only obtain product where consuming 5 tabs results in "minor visuals".

naysayers? some of us are objecting to his wild claims sans proof. is it really that bad to want proof of 500ug blotters? I could grab a pic off a board and make wild claims too...

if he's telling the truth... great! i would love to acquire some of these ~500ug tabs. however if he's not, and i spend money based on his statements... well that sucks, dont ya think? what if he is a vendor shilling his wares? (not saying that you are... but all points of view should be thought of)

and nanobrain - i said that your claims didnt make sense to me based on the reasoning that double dipping LSD is (supposedly) a myth. if you are telling the truth, rather than saying i have no knowledge, educate me - tell me how a saturated peice of blotter can absorb more liquid when saturation means that the cardboard cannot take any more liquid. Maybe my understanding is wrong, so educate rather than have an (implied) go at me.

I'm not having a go at you, i just want clarification. Thats not too much to ask for, is it?

 

[college_dropout]

I had 2 drops of liquid on the weekend. Really bowled me over. I had to leave the rave I was at and go lie down in a secluded park, then met up with my mates later on.

It was probably the strongest acid I've ever had. I asked for 3 but thank god the guy I bought it off only sold me 2. It was a fantastic trip but it did have parts of terror and anxiety rolled into it. Oh well, goes with the territory.

 

[[eK]]

fieldy doesn't know what he's missing out on

 

[TechKnow]

naysayers? some of us are objecting to his wild claims sans proof. is it really that bad to want proof of 500ug blotters? I could grab a pic off a board and make wild claims too...

if he's telling the truth... great! i would love to acquire some of these ~500ug tabs. however if he's not, and i spend money based on his statements... well that sucks, dont ya think? what if he is a vendor shilling his wares? (not saying that you are... but all points of view should be thought of)

and nanobrain - i said that your claims didnt make sense to me based on the reasoning that double dipping LSD is (supposedly) a myth. if you are telling the truth, rather than saying i have no knowledge, educate me - tell me how a saturated peice of blotter can absorb more liquid when saturation means that the cardboard cannot take any more liquid. Maybe my understanding is wrong, so educate rather than have an (implied) go at me.

I'm not having a go at you, i just want clarification. Thats not too much to ask for, is it?

QFmotherfuckinT

On the double-dipped issue, i can't believe this still crops its head up from time to time. Anyone with a brain can google it and realise that once a medium has reached total saturation, it cannot absorb anymore. If it could, then i'd be a billionaire from making sponges that never needed to be wrung out.

 

[nanobrain]

QFmotherfuckinT

On the double-dipped issue, i can't believe this still crops its head up from time to time. Anyone with a brain can google it and realise that once a medium has reached total saturation, it cannot absorb anymore. If it could, then i'd be a billionaire from making sponges that never needed to be wrung out.

well, sire, i venture that you - and all other brained, google trained member frater-historians of The Order of the Lowest Common Denominator of Net-Perpetuating Outdated Infahmaishun - tripped on acid that particular day, when at school they covered the complex subject of EVAPORATION in phys 101.

alas, to my sincere regret, you are not a Spongebob-billionaire...

if i may then: when carrier solvent (LSD in ethanol/water) leaves the matrix (blotter) through evaporation, additional solution can be applied to the matrix, left to dry, repeat...the limiting factors being the physicochemical properties of the particular paper used, like say its thickness which directly influences its carrying capacity...do you get the picture, and if not, have you ever wondered why they make sponges of differing thickness and size?

anyhow, i got a good laugh. on a more serious note, i am sure the creator would be happy to post free of charge one of the Orbs (extremely limited edition collector Sacrementals) for quantitative testing since it is unlikely that if i were to generate the spectra, it would convince this lot. just a single condition - the results are to be posted in thishere thread.

in Australia, where nanobrain deals not drugs and in fact claims that DMT and LSD should be free to all humans mature enough, there are the..can you guess what they are called?

hheh, wont bother you with mikeage, save to say that one 1cmx1cm blotter is best split into 4 among good friends in a proper set and setting.

 

[madmick19]

ahhh......nano brain a flame is still a flame no matter how you dress it with fanciful words ....

once again can the people posting in this tread please refrain from flaming each other or diagnosing each other, this is a thread about experiences of acid not a tennis match of insults