No, you didn't. All you did was repeat the same vague assertions about male violence against women being a manifestation of the 'selfish, greedy and egoistic desires' which supposedly caused said man to pursue a 'purdy' woman to begin with.
It sounds even more bizarre and ill-conceived the more you attempt to explain it.
Men abuse wom
en (sorry, you're not the only one but I
hate the way people can't seem to get a grip on 'women' / 'woman') for a whole host of reasons.
I'm sure your attempt at pop psychology even rings true in some cases, but to attempt to reduce and simplify the entire phenomenon in a way that presents the man as a helpless victim of his own thwarted desires is pretty darn thoughtless and possibly insulting.