• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Pissed_and_messed | Shinji Ikari

Jimmy Savile (aka: paedo speculation megathread)

Status
Not open for further replies.
give it a few years after all this has calmed down and we'll look back and think it was exactly the same as when we were up in arms about woofters wanting civil rights. as long as the churches aren't forced to conduct paedo weddings then the right wing leaning of society will tolerate them probably and then we can focus on more important legislation like upping the motorway speed limit to 80mph.
 
give it a few years after all this has calmed down and we'll look back and think it was exactly the same as when we were up in arms about woofters wanting civil rights. as long as the churches aren't forced to conduct paedo weddings then the right wing leaning of society will tolerate them probably and then we can focus on more important legislation like upping the motorway speed limit to 80mph.

What a terrific post to make on your 666th. Woofters and society tolerating peado's.
 
Davidson has shot his tainted, whisky-brown semen up some first division splitarse tho - Deborah Corrigan, Fiona Wright etc. Fiona Wright said when he got mad "his eyes went red, like a pigs".
 
Paedophilia: bringing dark desires to light

^^ this has been getting a lot of flack from the sun. read the comments section

The Guardian had it displayed prominently on their front page (web) with a huge graphic and then rather annoyingly and quickly changed that to lobbing it down the bottom making it hard to find.
 
Interesting article that, Mz Marmz. Not at all surprised that it maybe didn't go down so well amongst certain members of the redtop classes what with it being all balanced and thought-provoking and completely lacking in piccies of Gary Glitter or Myra Hindley and that. Clearly this can only be overwhelming evidence that everyone who writes for or reads The Grauniad is a vile paedo and therefore need to have their names and addresses published in a special edition of the Heil (complete with free pitchfork and burning torch for every reader when you collect just four tokens).

As for the contents of the article itself, I tend to agree with the German paedo project slogan quoted:

"You are not guilty because of your sexual desire, but you are responsible for your sexual behaviour. There is help."

There is a difference between fantasy and reality, between having "dark" desires and acting on those desires. People have all kindsa fucked-up fantasies that would make for equally lurid and repellant tabloid headlines should they ever come to light, but as long as they stay as fantasy or are acted on only in specific and controlled situations, they're not generally considered much of a problem and remain a harmless eccentricty.

Y'know those uber-realistic sex dolls? Perhaps a new product line is in order. A prepubescent version... perhaps called Tiny Tears. Bestiality is also illegal but you can buy a whole range of rubber animal cocks should you be intrigued by the idea of being bummed by a horse but don't want to end up as a footnote on Mr Hands' wikipedia page. Coming soon in the new Ann Summers collection: My Little Fleshlight (with free 125ml tube of shame and self-loathing on all orders under the age of consent).
 
UK law only outlaws anal and vaginal penetration on or by an animal.

Interestingly, masturbation of an animal is totally within the law. Which is good for the police, and probably some security people, who have been known to actively reward their dog by masturbating it.

Amber Marks talks to police who do exactly this in her book Headspace.
 
Well I never did know that, Mr Monday. You've clearly delved deeper into researching UK sexwrong laws =D

I can see why oral sex with animals isn't illegal. I'd pay good money to watch the International Pitbull Blowjob Championships. And why this vid hasn't been expanded into a primetime Saturday night tellybox format is beyond me :D

As for dog-wanking, I am aware of this practice. Had a girlfriend for a while who used to wank her dog off regularly. She couldn't understand why I found this to be somewhat distasteful. I know some freakazoids let their dog lick their face but this gal used to more or less Frenchie hers. And then wondered why I insisted on a lengthy period of toothbrush action on her part before letting her lips within a bargepole's length of my own. She was a born again Xtian though so at least it wasn't her least attractive behaviours.
 
And why this vid hasn't been expanded into a primetime Saturday night tellybox format is beyond me :D

I'm speechless! I thought the fleshlight was the pinnacle of masturbation technology, but the monkeys have us (and themselves, more to the point) thoroughly spanked.

OK I wasn't speechless.
 
Proof positive that us primates know what to do with a tool =D

One has to wonder what's going through the mind of that frog though. Bet he wasn't expecting that when he got up that morning 8(

Although, to be fair, when choosing a species to bucally rape frogs would have to be high on the list of options. Who hasn't sat down to watch a nice David Attenborough on amphibians and raised a quizzical eyebrow and made a mental note that should happenstance just so happen to place all relevant requirements (ie a frog and no witnesses) in the right place at the right time... that thoroughly moisty and elastic-looking mouth of theirs... Phwoar <3
 
To be clear, are you saying the police actually wank off their dogs?

Nice to see you continuing with the interspecies bestiality debate, Ponti :)

So... if a humanimal can wank off a dog legally,s it acceptable for Cunstubble Oink to toss off his terrier cos it not only sniffed out the drugs during the raid but - as a Brucey Bonus - also bit off one of the dealer's nadgers cos it got a bit overexcited? If a chimp can facefuck a frog can a gimp deepthroat a dachsund? It's questions like these that are vital for us to develop a basis for interspecies moral and legal frameworks.

It must be fucking living hell being a paedophile. Don't loads of them commit suicide/voluntary chemical castration?

Dunno about "loads" but certainly many do seem to. Well, they seem to whenever I wastch a doc on the subject. There's always an interview with some stereotypical-looking peado bloke telling the interviewer how choosing to be chemically castrated had lifted this great burden off his shoulders as he can now trust himself and not have the stress of it all.

Is kinda hard to feel much sympathy when the word "paedophile" is present but the number of such afflicted who cross the line and actually act on their desires is surely pretty small compared to the number who can keep it checked in the realm of fantasy. Must be utter shithouse to be in that position but they're still human beings no different from the rest of us so the vast majority surely know where the line is and stay the right side of it.
 
saw on the front of somebody's Sun this morning something about Keith chegwin...is he another one now?

This is, IMO, getting stupid. Saville was obviously a predatory paedophile, targetting underage and vulnerable kids, and taking advantage of those in disadvantaged positions.....as were some of the others...

Its now turning into hunting down anyone in "the entertainment industry" who's had sex with a fan.

I'm not trying to belittle the seriousness of the worst cases, but I think morality has gone a bit skewed at the moment.

Wasn't it the Sun newsaper that had a "countdown" to hermione off of Harry Potters 16th birthday, or Charlotte Church or someone.....
 
Wasn't it the Sun newsaper that had a "countdown" to hermione off of Harry Potters 16th birthday, or Charlotte Church or someone.....

Think it was the Heil but you may well be right. Makes nary a jot of difference really. The redtops all manage to take the definition of "hypocrisy" and really run with it :|

EDIT: Does make for some highly amusing juxtapositions between glamour shots of borderline legal girls illustrating some (very) vaguely related story 'bout summat on one side of the page with screaming headlines of "paedo" revelations nestled up snugly against 'em on t'other side of the page. It's such a blatant pisstake one can only really assume they do it deliberately knowing full well their readers are almost certainly too thick to realise anything's afoot, and their detractors are obliged to raise a grudging snigger at them having the gall to do it and the ability to get away with it.
 
^ Trouble with that is that while many may stay on the "right" side and not actively involve themselves in child molestation it's a safe bet many, many more know about and use child pornography sites in the ole Deep Web (or was it Dark Web? I forget already) and so probably create a demand/market for child molestation videos. It's a pretty slippery rope-walk. I still feel sorry for them just for having been born that way, because it wasn't their decision and surely if they'd had the pick of what/who to be attracted to when they reached sexual maturity it's a safe bet most/all wouldn't have ticked the box for "kiddies".

I can't say the same for the police as they choose their job from a far more neutral (i.e. non-genetic) standpoint so they're cunts in all sorts of ways that paedophiles (even the molesting kind) aren't. Throw in the fact that they molest their dogs and we're reaching crushing depths of moral fuckedupery. It's not a long stretch of the imagination to presume that if they're comfortable with wanking the dog they wouldn't feel too bad about poor Lassie returning the favour. I spit on them and their mothers' vaginas for giving birth to them.

Has it been decided that paedophilia has a genetic cause? Source?
 
I'd say that it probably is genetic, or at least not a totally conscious choice. Would you dispute that being attracted to people of the same sex isn't a choice? Why is that different?

(I'm just looking at that from pontifex's police comparison, ie choice/not-a-choice)

Btw, I am in no way equating peadophiles to homosexuals before someone jumps on that lol.
 
I'd say that it probably is genetic, or at least not a totally conscious choice. Would you dispute that being attracted to people of the same sex isn't a choice?

The options aren't genetics and choice, but rather genetic and environmental factors, I would say.

Not sure it's clear what I'm saying. I don't think choice has anything to do with it. Genetics, maybe. Environmental factors, i.e. life experiences in childhood, maybe.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top