Psychedelic Wizard and his monkey logic. I think this guy should be banned, he usually blurts out false information out of anger and never agrees with evidence and research.
He is like the people who say MDMA isn't neurotoxic, i am still doing good in school you see! If you space it you will not run into damage.
Listen man, i love meth as much as the next person but don't defend the drug and make it seem harmless. You are making people belittle the dangers that can arise with drugs, like meth.
You are a prime example of what is wrong with the world's intellectual communities today. Do not like what someone has to say? Suppress them! Even if everything I typed down was outright lies and misinformation, I still should have the right to say it, as it is then your job to disprove me, if you cannot do that, then you are admitting by default, I am correct. Anyone who would silence someone out of fear is no different than burning the proverbial witch at the stake. Why do I know you know I'm right? Because of your hostility. If you thought I was crazy or stupid or obviously misinformed, there would be no hostility, only laughter and some form of a sarcastic response.
It is especially hilarious you mention "evidence and research" when all the "evidence and research" collected on "illegal drugs" is hilariously scarce, not to mention invariably maliciously controlled to produce favorable results to the establishment. Want to keep methamphetamine illegal? Get a few "scientists" that aren't afraid of skewing results and collecting skewed data, some "volunteers" who are easily influenced by suggestion, and viola! You now can conduct some "legitimate" scientific tests to prove the dangers of these terrible, soul-destroying Satanic drugs (hahaha)!
Oh, make sure you use a lot of scientific mumbo-jumbo jargon to make it sound intelligent, words like dopamine and neuro-receptor and vasoconstriction, words that no layperson would understand, therefore using that to add "credibility" to your house of cards. So yeah, consider me skeptical of a laughably small amount of studies conducted by biased governments not to be objectively neutral, but instead to simply arrive to conclusions that reinforce beliefs, the exact opposite of the Scientific Method. Or where you talking about those hundreds of private studies that somehow were able to conduct experiments using drugs that are illegal and record the information publicly? Oh wait...
Bumping your head on a wall is neurotoxic, breathing fumes from a car running on idle is neurotoxic, watching television is neurotoxic, sunlight is neurotoxic, haha, what else? Let's analyze this word "neurotoxic", shall we? It basically can be summarized that it destroys your brain, right? Well, how exactly? Based on even the studies your government has produced, it might damage serotonin receptors, but that is the extent of brain damage, is it not? Or does it also making you a drooling retard who is confined to a wheelchair and shits their pants automatically from henceforth?
Use your critical thinking a little stronger and you might find some more solid conclusions. Fear is what galvanizes your "research". I know people who actually have used drugs like MDMA every weekend for years and are actually happy people who function better than most, whereas I also know those who have never touched any drug, many of these are psychiatrists ironically, who are chronically depressed. Geeze, I wonder why that is the case? Almost like all your research is bullshit and nothing but a closed-loop of idiots spewing the idiocy of other idiots, who all have never even experimented to any great length, just burrow skewed results from others and confirm it. Tell me then, if any of these anti-drug people were so very happy, why do they always seem so fucking depressed and angry? Literally, every single person that was strongly against drugs, was a miserable person.
If what you were saying was true, even by simple logic, these people should be smiling and happy carefree types, but in reality, they have the exact same cross-section emotional response as drug users. Weird, huh?
There are dangerous that can arise from not doing meth, by the way. Things like obesity which can kill you faster than meth abuse. Not to mention social alienation, disorganized thinking, reduced cognitive control, impulsive behavior, reduced muscular strength, reduced intelligence quotient, and decreased metabolism, not to mention others.
I guess if you get your drug facts from a Mormon propaganda pamphlet delivered with a box of Girl Guide cookies, then you would type what you've typed.
Drugs are about as harmful as flying on an airplane, which is to say, the risks are vastly overstated.
I'll even go as far to say that drugs are actually healthy for you and lead to permanent improvements in many regards, but that just doesn't chuck-and-jive with the established worldview.
No, of course not, Vitamin C is healthy for you, but the concept that improving your metabolism, IQ, muscular strength, physical reflex response time from amphetamines? No way! Right...