• S E X
    L O V E +
    R E L A T I O N S H I P S


    ❤️ Welcome Guest! ❤️


    Posting Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • SLR Moderators: Senior Staff

I’m a straight male, why do I want to suck dick?

Atelier3 said:
Men who have sex with men.

It’s a sociological term that also captures men who don’t identify as gay. You see it in the public health literature all the time these days.
Click to expand...
Ok that term ignores or is dismissive of how there are bisexual and gay men.
 
The title of this thread is"Im a straight male, but I haven't experimented". How many people can say they are anti weed or anti alcohol without experiencing it. God isn't drugs or vice-versa. but, things are just good. Sex is good. Hardcore drugs are good. Life is suffering.
 
PriestTheyCalledHim said:
Well it's certainly not that way.
Click to expand...
Umm...yes it is. The phrase "men who have sex with men" is definitively inclusive of gay and bisexual men.
By the way, I don't say this often, but I am bisexual. And I often wonder why so many people seem like they're just waiting for something to get offended about.
 
birdup.snaildown said:
The title of this thread is"Im a straight male, but I haven't experimented". How many people can say they are anti weed or anti alcohol without experiencing it. God isn't drugs or vice-versa. but, things are just good. Sex is good. Hardcore drugs are good. Life is suffering.
Click to expand...
In what way do you mean to say that hardcore drugs are "good"? Not to say I wouldn't rail an entire point of mexxy if it came into my hands right now but you know
 
Zuda said:
Umm...yes it is. The phrase "men who have sex with men" is definitively inclusive of gay and bisexual men.
By the way, I don't say this often, but I am bisexual. And I often wonder why so many people seem like they're just waiting for something to get offended about.
Click to expand...
No it is dismissive, just like the slur 'queer' that is super dated from the very early 1990s.
 
PriestTheyCalledHim said:
No it is dismissive, just like the slur 'queer' that is super dated from the very early 1990s.
Click to expand...
The term originates in the public health literature. Capturing all men who have sex with men was vitally important during the AIDS epidemic and in managing HIV transmission in the community ever since. From a public health perspective the way a person identifies (gay/queer/bi/poly/straight/whatever) has no meaning. What matters is whether they engage in risky sexual practices and the evidence has always been that MSM (regardless of how they identify) are a high risk group for HIV.
 
This is my 2 cents:

Sexual Orientation is a social construct that's built on centuries of cultural discouragement of individuality and open-mindedness.

Sexuality is a spectrum of individual tastes, and no 2 flavors are exactly the same.

Admittedly, it can be difficult to consciously discover AND accept that you'd like to taste a new flavor when you believe it contradicts your longtime favorite flavor.

Social conditioning has led a lot of us to believe that sexuality and sexual preferences must be lumped together because logic says " X + Y = Z ".

I do not believe that sexuality can be mathematically defined in this way.

That's what I've concluded from my personal experience of struggling to define my own sexuality.
 
The Wizard of the Creek said:
Sure. I find the whole activity of sucking a dick silly. I just know I couldn’t take it seriously or give that dick the attention it needs. No offense to some of the artists out there that pride themselves creating magic sucking a dude off. Not everyone is good at doing everything! Right? I’m really talented and am an artist in a lot of other ways, but I just know that I would let someone down trying to suck their dick the way that dicks should be sucked. I’m Ok admitting that with.
Click to expand...
So are you a boy or a girl? I'm a boy and I love going down on girls. It's an art for me, and my main objective is to make her gush in my face. I'm pretty good at it lol
I guess to get good at something, you just have to want to do it c(:
 
Navoc said:
This is my 2 cents:

Sexual Orientation is a social construct that's built on centuries of cultural discouragement of individuality and open-mindedness.

Sexuality is a spectrum of individual tastes, and no 2 flavors are exactly the same.

Admittedly, it can be difficult to consciously discover AND accept that you'd like to taste a new flavor when you believe it contradicts your longtime favorite flavor.

Social conditioning has led a lot of us to believe that sexuality and sexual preferences must be lumped together because logic says " X + Y = Z ".

I do not believe that sexuality can be mathematically defined in this way.

That's what I've concluded from my personal experience of struggling to define my own sexuality.
Click to expand...
I kind of agree with this. I am a mostly straight male but much like OP, I would totally try the chicks-with-dicks thing. Not very interested in making love to an actual man though. They would have to be extremely feminine with no body hair lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top