tweakerguy
Bluelighter
Sure! At 6am.Oh you went to sleep too huh....ok then![]()
But really, after a short while you start going to bed again like a normal person.
Last edited:
Sure! At 6am.Oh you went to sleep too huh....ok then![]()
its cool :Dactually maybe your right tbh I have only seen horrible pics of meth users obviously all full time users probably don't look half as bad same with crack and heroin after reading my post it does come across as stereotyping a bit my bad bro
haha IKR."How to swim without getting wet"
Yeah Iâm also older and took âecstasyâ/MDMA in the 90s and early 2000s (and still take it now, along with meth and most other illicit drugs (and note: Iâm not some burnt-out brain-dead junkie tweaker bartard coke-head [enter your favorite, judgmental, pejorative term for drug user])). Not likely I would be into Primus otherwise, right, enough to pick-out a Pork-Soda-era Primus reference.i made this account 16 years ago, back when mdma was still mostly in pill form and i'd come to check the pill reports
There is a lot worse than that, relatively speaking, and anyway did you obtain conclusive proof that these pills actually contained methamphetamine, or was this simply an assumption turned into rumor and spread around locally without anyone questioning the validity of this claim? Iâm guessing you canât be certain at this point, and maybe you should qualify the unverified assumptions in this story a little better.because their was nothing worse than eating an E pill and ending up with my jaw clinched clenched for 12 hours from a god damn tweeky ass METH BOMB
So⌠who convinced you there are rules? Seems to me like youâre attempting to apply your own arbitrarily written rules on the rest of the world, and thatâs just not how things work, nor is it a wise practice.SO....you're gonna try to tell me that there is a such thing as an occasional meth user, when rule #1 clearly states, there is no such thing as an occasional meth user, no matter what anybody tries to tell you
Actually, in a very real sense it does. After all, if something is popular, in general it is something that is in high demand. Economics teaches us about the laws of supply and demand and their effect on price/value. As demand rises, generally so does price; therefore correlating popularity to value.#2 - Popularity does NOT equal value....
Faulty logic, and you missed my point. Though to be fair, youâre more than welcome to your own opinion about things. I just wanted the record to show that this is merely your opinion and not some universal truth as you present it.which also goes against what you were just telling me about thinking for yourself right? right
I honestly donât believe you. I think youâve mistakenly thought some MDMA pills you had were laced with meth and consider yourself to have âdone meth a few timesâ without any idea of whether this is true. Clearly, youâve never had a long, kinky sex session on meth, for example, or you would have to admit the unbelievably strong aphrodisiac qualities the drug possesses. Besides, donât you know the Primus song, âDamned Blue Collar Tweakersâ?#C - Oh yea - ive done meth a few times and i wouldn't make a comment about it if i had no personal experience with it to be honest
Oh? Itâs worse than third generation bath salts like a-PHP, Hexen, and Isopropylphenidate? Worse than fentanyl with all its associated fatal ODs? Is it worse than butylone or one of the myriad unpredictable synthetic cannabinoids? Youâre telling me Datura/Jimson weed is a better drug than methamphetamine?- it's the worst drug i ever did and ive done almost everything....
I have no idea what you have or havenât done. Working with what youâve said so far in this thread, Iâm making educated guesses based on my knowledge, experience, and similarity of your comments to those of others Iâve known who simply werenât aware of their ignorance regarding the finer points of N,Îą-dimethylphenethylamine. But yes purity makes a difference for sure, as with virtually any substance.but you think the quality might change my mind?
What was your route of administration, champ? You were vaporizing it, snorting it, swallowing it, etc.? Any idea how much you used? Were you using it with experienced meth users or just sorta winging it on your own? Or again: were you just assuming you had pills cut with it?i can tell you this: no drug felt like it polluted my system quite like meth - a minimum of 10 days until i felt like it was out of me and i started to feel like me again
People who are against meth (or any drug) either havenât used it, or really sucked at using it and fucked up as a result. Everyone else enjoyed it or was indifferent. If people close to you couldnât handle it, this explains your attitude toward the drug, but does not help illuminate the truth, in my opinion. Meth certainly has its flaws, gotchas, and particular set of dangers to be aware of. Itâs not for no reason itâs reputation is sketchy â some people donât handle it well and this makes it hard on the rest of us, unfortunately.easily the worst drug out of them all and ive also seen the people around me and what it does to them
I know youâve planted your feet firmly in your opinion, and this dialogue likely will only entrench you deeper in your beliefs, but try to open your mind a little, ok?⌠Also, when you say âyouâ in that statement above, I think youâre prescribing your arbitrary set of rules on the world again. Iâve personally never experienced drug-induced schizophrenia, and Iâm middle-aged as a motherfucker with decades of experience behind me. Iâve seen amphetamine psychosis at least a dozen times though, and in each case the person wasnât using responsibly. They were abusing meth and not keeping up with their health, and almost entirely because they didnât know better. Iâll grant you that some ppl are more prone to compulsion than others; but ultimately every adult is responsible for their own behaviors, and blaming them on any drug is a bullshit cop-out that should not be tolerated. My proverbial $0.02 anyway.nothing good comes out of meth - eventually you still end up with some sort of drug induced schizophrenia -
Quod erat demonstrandum.but go ahead, tell me how great it is when you don't do meth like an asshole![]()
People donât often get to hear the stories of responsible use, and I think itâs important to share them so as to lead by example. I am not seeking your approval and I suspect youâre being sarcastic, so I guess weâll conclude the debate.well im really proud of you for being a career functional meth-user
Yeah, Iâm putting on Sailing the Seas of Cheese now. I saw them live twice during this era; biggest mosh pit Iâve ever seen occurred during the breakdown of âJerry Was a Race Car Driverâ (the part right after he says, âGo!â). If nothing else, we agree on something, eh?of course i know about those damn blue collared tweekers - it's a great song....
1. thatâs a stereotype; I assure you I am not going to rob you, no matter how high on meth I am.but i don't wanna be robbed...so i go the opposite way from tweekers
Thanks, I always do.enjoy your habit
![]()
you go the opposite way by leaving comments on Bluelightâs meth threads?
well im really proud of you for being a career functional meth-user...
but i don't wanna be robbed...so i go the opposite way from tweekers
yea because i don't have to worry about you robbing the mail out of my mailbox on bluelight
I don't mod this forum, so this is in my personal capacity: while it's fine to talk about the pros and cons of different drugs and to have strong opinions that certain drugs just suck, stereotyping or shaming users of a particular drug is pretty frowned upon in this harm reduction forum.
On a macro level meth seem approximately as problematic as opiates in some countries. On a micro level, most property crime related to drug use in Australia has come from opiate users. I've been robed by junkies but never tweakers.
Lol, well played, sir. Well played.yea because i don't have to worry about you robbing the mail out of my mailbox on bluelight
To me, the correlation between drug-dependency and victim-bearing crimes is not evidence of causation, but rather it also correlates to poverty and desperation, which lead heavily to criminal motive in many cases throughout affected regions. In other words, I think poverty leads to crime, not drug abuse. Drug abuse (as opposed to âuseâ) itself most likely leads to poverty, we might speculate, and this certainly helps explain the correlation, but it's reductivist to conclude that the de facto result of any particular drug use will inevitably lead to criminality, no exceptions.i think they both steal equally - that's a tough call there
Then again, stereotypes are wonderful timesavers, and they're kind of a social shorthand, as it were. This can be very useful when one considers how brevity is the sole of wit. They're also a bit lazy.but hey let me stop there before i start stereo-typing again
Same, both counts.sometimes i do that...what can i say, im human
Good man. All the same, I really do appreciate the concern, and believe you, and others, have the best intentions at heart. Anyway I'm just thrilled at the Primus reference, so you had me at that, you rascal youâŚbut i apologize
smoke meth - enjoy it - i won't say anything else about it