LOL, what shit did I make up?
Some people are simply not interested in knowledge. They just wanna share their little anecdotes. They want their own beliefs to be confirmed. We love drugs, everything is all good. Well, and when sometimes it's not, we at least want to get a pat on their back.
And when somebody says something you don't want to hear all you do is cry out "source?" That's ridiculous. Why I am more liable to provide references than others? I have other work to do. When I work, I provide sources. When I hang around BL for half an hour, I won't always do that. I may not have the time. I still try to argue scientifically to the best I can. But this is an informal exchange. You can't expect me to regularly point others to references or data. Of course, I'm all happy if somebody volunteers to compile references or data.
Lastly: despite your hostile tone, here's a suggestion for you. Why don't you put "addictive potential" into google, or search a research database (and/or journal database)? You will find that it's the majority opinion that quite a few stims (e.g., cocaine) are considered more addictive than commonly-prescribed benzos.
Lastly: despite your hostile tone, here's a suggestion for you. Why don't you put "addictive potential" into google, or search a research database (and/or journal database)? You will find that it's the majority opinion that quite a few stims are considered more addictive than commonly-prescribed benzos. Obviously, a lot of variables are gonna matter (ROA, etc.) but I tried to make a simple statement. I'm not here to write papers.
tl;dr this constant call "source?" is to be considered trolling. do your own research!
