Ghettotastic_bong
Bluelighter
There is another way to look at this issue. How about this- the human race is doing so well in terms of advancement and numbers that it can afford to have some of its population not contribute to producing more numbers. Therefore having a significant proportion of the population being homosexual (or just choosing to not have kids) is an indicator that the human race is prospering with the growth of technology and not just relying on producing as many offspring as possible- like insects or fish etc.
I have heard that argument many times, and have never, ever found any example of which it becomes valid for several reasons.
1. Homosexuality exists in the animal kingdom as well. Humans are not the only animals that engage in homosexual behavior, and most of the species who engage in homosexuality are not as "successful" as humans.
2. What makes people think homosexuality is a recent thing? Homosexuality was prized in greek culture which didn't have nearly our level of sanitation and with a much lower overall quality of life.
Reading through this thread, i like zorn's comparasion of homosexuality to infertility. While it's a negitive thing for a species trying to prosper (whether humanity needs to prosper anymore is a different debate), it's certaintly not anyone's fault, nor should anyone be thought less of because of it. It's simply an unfavorable trait from the prospect of growth of a species