Hillary Clinton: We Can't Legalize Drugs Because 'There Is Just Too Much Money in It'

static_mind said:
I think she means legaliseing/decriminliseing small amounts. She fears more people will start useing so the drug dealers will earn more cash.
Click to expand...

That would be stupid, and wouldn't solve the problems of government spending and border violence.. Complete legalization with regulation and legalized manufacturing is the only obvious answer.. whats the point in decriminalizing if it's still made on the black market? Not to mention if it's allowed to be produced, it can be sold and taxed, revenue from company profits is spent on employee's salaries to make the drugs. More jobs, more taxes being paid, no more money going back to drug dealing cartels abroad.

Unfortunately, I think she meant exactly what she said, because she would have said decriminalization, if that's what she meant. There's a big difference, and I still have faith that even though her constituence may not have caught the mistake, she fully knew what she was saying didn't make any sense. She's probably just hoping nobody else noticed 8(

Possible motives for what she said: Banking industry has a lot to gain by laundering money for cartels. The industry is probably one of her many campaign sponsors...

Chris Arsenault

Wachovia (now owned by Wells Fargo) and Bank of America, two of the largest banks in the US, admitted that they had not done enough to spot drug money when handling $378.4bn for Mexican currency exchange shops between 2004 and 2007.

In March, the US justice department charged Wachovia with violating the Bank Secrecy Act, legislation which prohibits money laundering, and the bank's new owner paid $160mn in fines and penalties, Bloomberg News reported.

http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/2010/11/20101131033622877.html
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
They can’t be given an even easier road to take, because they will then find it in their interest to addict even more young people. Mexico didn’t have much of a drug problem before the last 10 years (, and you want to keep it that way. So you don’t want to give any excuse to the drug traffickers to be able legally to addict young people.
Click to expand...
Yeah, you can't give the Mexicans the ability to legally get young people hooked on drugs. That's Purdue's job.
 
|>R()|)!G/-\|_ said:
What does she even mean by that? There's too much money in what?
Click to expand...

It means that current economic system which the illegal drug system is apart of, is too big and powerful to simply reverse the course of things, even if it is the right thing to do.

Think about everyone that has a job, because of illegal drugs.

Cops.
Judges.
Lawyers.
Real Estate.
The entire DEA.
Prison guards.
Gun dealers.
Shippers.
Bankers.

All of these people rely on drugs being illegal.

Just think about police for a second.
If all drugs were legal, how many cops would get a pink slip because all of a sudden we didn't need to go hassle black kids slinging crack in the projects, or white kids in the suburbs smoking weed in a garage.
 
Yeah, you can't give the Mexicans the ability to legally get young people hooked on drugs. That's Purdue's job.
Click to expand...

and Shire.

I'm surprised only 2 small newspapers ran with this story. She essentially said she's OK with small amounts of drugs being decriminalized:

you can legalize small amounts for possession, but those who are making so much money selling, they have to be stopped.
Click to expand...

I know I'm taking it out of context, but follow the logic:

you can legalize small amounts for possession...
Click to expand...

but

...those who are making so much money selling, they have to be stopped.
Click to expand...

She's saying the market should be regulated, not liberated. This entails legalizing individual consumption but controlling the means of production and distribution. i.e. socialism

Why doesn't someone just ask her to elaborate? Like PM her or something. I think her handle is Jenkem Genie or something along those lines.
 
Someone please slap this stupid cunt. she means "There is too much money coming into my pockets from keeping drugs illegal."
 
I have always hated this cunt, she runs around to countries trying to make them have a War on drugs.....$$$$$$$$$$$$ is all they care about, they do not give a shit about anyone but the money

We have tons of Lobbyist's promoting the war on drugs... Now you know why... Too Much money in it lol ,stupid cunt
 
DavisK4high247 said:
There is too much money going to government agents, cops, lawyers, prison guards,DEA fucks,etc.. she really means the government has created such a vast bueracracy of people that rely on drugs being illegal for their jobs/salarys, like her and other politicans,etc.. to legalisze drugs, then the DEA fucks, a bunch of cops, judges, Customs agents, jail builders, and lawyers would be out of work!!! The dirty fuckers, they do not care about the people, they want to get paid! And 30,000 have died in Mexico so far, sadly not just 20,000..and thats what we know about...Fucking US government and the CIA are the biggest drug dealers in the world, followed by their contributors Big Pharmaceuticals...
Click to expand...



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

This is 100% accurate!
 
I wouldnt put it past her if she has her hands in sex slavery but thats for another time. Unless there is a revolution in this country, nothing will ever change!
 
Wow, that statement was on par with the give maps to third world children miss america chick.
 
235360287471352662 said:
and Shire.

I'm surprised only 2 small newspapers ran with this story. She essentially said she's OK with small amounts of drugs being decriminalized:



I know I'm taking it out of context, but follow the logic:



but



She's saying the market should be regulated, not liberated. This entails legalizing individual consumption but controlling the means of production and distribution. i.e. socialism

Why doesn't someone just ask her to elaborate? Like PM her or something. I think her handle is Jenkem Genie or something along those lines.
Click to expand...

I think they'd rather keep it illegal, fight the war on drugs, keep prices high, but possibly decriminalize it in small amounts (one would still have to pay HUGE fines or do some time for small amounts, although it wouldn't hurt chances of a getting a job as bad, possibly. - Thats the money/power/greed agenda, IF ANY decriminilization was even done by her administration...

Why not just legalize and regulate it like tobacco & alcohol? As a matter of fact, just get the ATF to handle drugs also, call it ATFD ;) Cut the cartels out, pump money back into the US economy instead of into drug dealing gangs. - This is the logical solution.
 
Someone should tell her that the United States Government could set up labs, plantations, factories, and God knows what else to start producing and creating all forms of drugs that are currently illegal and make them legal, cut the price by half of what the Cartels charge, flood the market, regulate the quality and make all that 'too much money' she spoke of to maybe get the United States back in the global economy as a key figure, not to mention the ammount of jobs it would produce domestically.

Hell with the money they would make off that we could even pay off the national debt which Obama saw fit to almost double.

By the way, you know the last President to pay off the national debt:

Andrew Jackson, our 7th President. Seventh. Pretty soon our tab is gonna get called and we're gonna be washin dishes for China.
 
Mora Fiend said:
Someone should tell her that the United States Government could set up labs, plantations, factories, and God knows what else to start producing and creating all forms of drugs that are currently illegal and make them legal, cut the price by half of what the Cartels charge, flood the market, regulate the quality and make all that 'too much money' she spoke of to maybe get the United States back in the global economy as a key figure, not to mention the ammount of jobs it would produce domestically.

Hell with the money they would make off that we could even pay off the national debt which Obama saw fit to almost double.

By the way, you know the last President to pay off the national debt:

Andrew Jackson, our 7th President. Seventh. Pretty soon our tab is gonna get called and we're gonna be washin dishes for China.
Click to expand...

I would never want the government to make the drugs I use. NEVER. American beauracracies are notoriously ineffective, and it would void free market mechanisms that encourage healthy competition (each vendor would have better quality control, to keep customers. As a legal business, it would still pay income tax and generate revenue to the government. And the money people spend would go straight back into paying industry-related employees, and then wherever they spend it, and obviously tax revenue would go to the treasury.
 
^I do agree and should of worded that differently, the government should allow these things to be set up and just take their pound of flesh. However you have to admit any corporation that is going to make that much revenue is going to be notoriously corrupt, look at the oil industry. You telling me that the price of gas needs to be what it is when the oil companies are reporting record profits while the nation has been faced with nothing but dismal news about the economy and unemployment.
 
Obama said last month that legalization is a valid subject for debate. Now his secretary of state is staging that debate. Is this a trend?

I mean, she's incoherent and she's having Freudian slips, but she's entertaining the question.

Why not open the floodgates? Why is the media not all over this?

Keep asking about legalization. Ask about it every time one of these fucks gets in front of a mike. Make it trend on Twitter and all that bullshit. Open the floodgates.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top